Case law

Board of Revenue v. State ex rel. Wiley

199 Ala. 260 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1917

We think that the qualification fixed by the act is sanctioned by this court in the case of Finklea v. Farish, 160 Ala. 230 , 49 South. 366 , and which said case was reaffirmed in the case of State, ex rel. Brassell v. … Teasley, 194 Ala. 574 , 69 South. 723 , wherein it was pointed out that the case of Kentz v.

Lewis v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County

419 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Aug 9, 1976

State Board of Optometry v. Lee Optical Co. of Ala.

284 Ala. 562 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 18, 1969

From that decree the State Board of Optometry, the complainant below, appealed to this court. … Skains v. Barnes, supra; Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Green, supra; Fuqua v. Fuqua, supra; Cutter v. Waddingham, 33 Mo. 269 ; Berry v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.

Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Conecuh County Board of Education

495 So. 2d 1108 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1986

The tenure statutes do not provide for any alternative procedure where the board is found to be too biased to conduct a hearing. … In light of the board members’ strong statements that a hearing would not affect their decision to terminate Gantt’s employment, the board’s argument, that the Court of Civil Appeals’ findings do not support a conclusion

Waterworks & Sewer Board of the City of Selma v. Allen

3 So. 3d 846 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 15, 2008

“In Kid’s Care, Inc. v. … Board of Trs. of Alabama State Univ., 703 So.2d 335 (Ala.1997); Gilbert v. Wells, 473 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1985).

Thompson v. State

374 So. 2d 377 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Oct 3, 1978

Brown v. State, Ala.Crim.App., 338 So.2d 1050 ; Summers v. State, Ala.Crim.App., 348 So.2d 1126 , See McElroy's Law of Evidence in Alabama, 2nd Ed., § 69.01(3). … In The King v.

Pate v. State

243 Ala. 44 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 5, 1942

We are unable to find any distinction whatever, in principle, between the statement of facts in the instant case and that in the case of Brown Plumbing & Heating Co. v. McDowell, 240 Ala. 485 , 200 So. 104 . … Clearly, the agreed facts bring appellant within schedule 42, section 348 of the Revenue Act of 1935, and on the authority of Brown Plumbing & Heating Co. v.

Brown v. University of Alabama

District Court, N.D. Alabama · Jul 10, 2025

Brown and Patti McGee Brown bring claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against The Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama (the “Board”),1 Kay Palan, Joanne Hale, and Kristy Reynolds. Doc. 1. … The Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama, like any other board of a state university in Alabama, is an arm of the state for purposes of Eleventh Amendment immunity. Page v. Hicks, 773 F.

Cooper v. State Ex Rel. Hawkins

226 Ala. 288 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1933

Woodward v. Skeggs, 154 Ala. 249 , 46 So. 268 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Porter, 145 Ala. 541 , 40 So. 144 ; State ex rel. Covington v. Thompson, 142 Ala. 98 , 38 So. 679 ; Smith v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Roman v. Woolfolk

98 Ala. 219 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1893

“We quoted approvingly tbe cases of Greaves v. Gonge, 69 N. Y. 154 , and Brewer v. Boston Theatre, 104 Mass. 378 . In Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U. … See, also, Mack v. DeBardeleben Coal & Iron Co.. 90 Ala. 396 .

State Ex Rel. McCaulley v. Board of Revenue & Road Com'rs

26 Ala. App. 309 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1935

So far as we know, the following language used by our Supreme Court in the opinion in the case of Minchener v. … Lewis et al. v. Jenkins, 215 Ala. 680 , 112 So. 205, 206 .

Jefferson County Board of Equalization & Adjustments v. First Alabama Bank

591 So. 2d 498 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 26, 1991

On appeal to this court, the Board reasserts that because the jury of commissioners relied on extraneous facts in reaching its verdict, the Board is entitled to a new trial. … Weekly v. Horn, 263 Ala. 364 , 82 So.2d 341 (1955). Thus, the Bank contends that the affidavit should not be allowed to impeach the verdict of the commissioners.

Wood, Wire & Metal Lathers, International Local No. 216 v. Brown & Root, Inc.

157 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Dec 31, 1957

Brown & Root, Inc., 258 Ala. 430 , 63 So.2d 372 ). The need for injunctive relief became unnecessary and, on sworn motion by Brown & Root, Inc., showing this, the case was dismissed. … The Bush case has been followed in Alabama by Town of East Lake v. De Vore, 169 Ala. 237 , 53 So. 1018 , and National Surety Co. v. Citizens’ Light, Heat & Power Co., 201 Ala. 456 , 78 So. 834 .

Jefferson County Board of Health v. Birmingham Hide & Tallow Co.

38 So. 3d 714 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 11, 2009

Smith v. Clark, 468 So.2d 138, 141 (Ala.1985).” Williams v. Williams, 910 So.2d 1284, 1286 (Ala.Civ.App.2005). … See also Ashley v. State ex rel. Brooks, 668 So.2d 7, 8 (Ala.

H. Ex Rel. T.H. v. Montgomery County Board of Education

784 F. Supp. 2d 1247 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 12, 2011

Garcia v. Gloor, 618 F.2d 264, 267 (5th Cir.1980). 1 In deciding whether to certify a class, a district court has broad discretion. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 959 F.2d 1566, 1569 (11th Cir.1992). … H’s claim that the burden rests with the Board comes from a Ninth Circuit case, Larry P. By Lucille P. v.

Alabama Jersey Cattle Club v. Alabama State Milk Control Board

274 Ala. 611 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 28, 1963

White Way Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 265 Ala. 660 , 93 So.2d 509 . … Limiting our review to the scope contemplated by the Homewood decision, as we must do (White Way Pure Milk Co. v.

State Board of Health v. Atnip Design & Supply Center, Inc.

385 So. 2d 1307 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 11, 1980

The Board counterclaimed for injunction against Plaintiffs to prevent the further development of the subdivision until all areas to be developed were approved by the Board. … McDowell-Purcell, Inc. v. Bass, 370 So.2d 942 (Ala.1979).

State Board of Nursing v. Stejskal

835 So. 2d 1017 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · May 17, 2002

Ex parte Alabama Board of Nursing, 835 So.2d 1010 (Ala.2001). In accordance with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded. REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Ex Parte Squires

960 So. 2d 661 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 1, 2006

Marvin's, Inc. v. Robertson , 608 So.2d 391 (Ala. 1992); City of Bridgeport v. Citizens Action Committee , 571 So.2d 1089 (Ala. 1990). … Marvin's, Inc. , supra; Richard Brown Auction Real Estate, Inc. v. Brown , 583 So.2d 1313 (Ala. 1991); Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc. , 470 So.2d 1194 (Ala. 1985).'" 960 So.2d at 656 . IV.

Ex Parte Bradford

795 So. 2d 652 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 2000

HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, and BROWN, JJ., dissent. HOUSTON, Justice (dissenting). … See Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 , 93 S.Ct. 705 , 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). Let the Legislature be the Legislature. BROWN, J., concurs. SEE, Justice (dissenting).