Case law

Edwards v. Pratt

171 Okla. 257 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1935

Board of Commissioners of Nowata County, 166 Okla. 78 , 25 P. (2d) 1074 . … The third syllabus in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Woods County et al. v. State ex rel.

Opinion No. 68-220 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1968

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 .

Dorough v. Board of Com'rs of Carter County

179 Okla. 109 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1937

We had occasion to construe this section of the statute in the case of Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v. … We have since held to the contrary in Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Washington County, 171 Okla. 302 , 42 P. (2d) 533 .

In Re Estate of Crowell v. Board of County Commissioners of County of Cleveland

2010 OK 5 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 2010

Manley v. Brown, 1999 OK 79, ¶ 22 , 989 P.2d 448, 455 . … Wilson v.

Vose v. U.S. Cities Corporation

152 Okla. 295 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1931

In tbe case of Mires v. … In the case of Gamel v.

Opinion No. 71-101 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 15, 1971

The amount approved by the Excise Board for that account for the year 1968-1969 was $178,612.82. … In the case of Brown v.

Wilson v. State ex rel. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists

337 P.2d 727 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1959

This court is committed to the rule that the order of the Board of Governors of Registered Dentists revoking license to practice dentistry must be supported by substantial evidence. Smith v. State, Okl., 330 P.2d 366 . … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., concurs in result. WELCH and BERRY, JJ., dissent. The Court acknowledges the aid of Supernumerary Judge N. S. Corn in the preparation of this opinion.

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston County Excise Board

330 P.2d 206 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1958

Instead of approving an appropriation of those sums for those purposes, the protestee Excise Board approved no appropriation for the purchase of furniture, but did approve an appropriation of $1,995.27 for -“Remodeling or … Co. v. Choctaw County Excise Board, 173 Okl. 312 , 48 P.2d 312 .

State ex rel. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists v. Dixon

203 Okla. 410 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1950

ARNOLD, V. C. J. By his petition filed herein Dr. P. F. … An examination of the record discloses that the question now presented is identical with that presented to and determined by us in the recent case of Board of Governors, Registered Dentists of Oklahoma, v. C. E.

Independent School District No. 65 of Wagoner County v. State Board of Education

289 P.2d 379 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 25, 1955

Ensley v. Goins, 192 Okl. 587 , 138 P.2d 540 ; Musick v. State ex rel. Miles, 185 Okl. 140 , 90 P.2d 631 . … J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J.', and CORN, DAVISON, HALLEY and JACKSON, JJ., concur. BLACKBIRD, J., dissents.

Isbell v. State ex rel. Retirement & Pension Board of the Department of Public Safety

603 P.2d 758 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1979

at the option of such *760 party where the property affected is situated, within thirty (30) days after the appellant is notified of the order as pro- . vided in Section 312 of this title. . . ” [Emphasis added] In Trask v. … J., IRWIN, V. C. J., and WILLIAMS, HODGES, SIMMS, DOOLIN and HARGRAVE, JJ., concur. OP ALA, J., concurs specially.

Board of Com'rs of Lincoln County v. Roark

145 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 28, 1930

In the case of Willet v. … W. 500 ; Dyar v. Farmington Village Corp., 70 Me. 527 ; Hamscom v. City of Omaha, 11 Neb. 37 , 7 N. W. 739 ; Erie v. Russell, 148 Pa. 384 , 23 Atl. 1102 .

Sherry v. State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs

140 Okla. 232 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

The action was begun by the board of county commissioners of Tulsa county against Wayne L. … Scott et al. v. Amis et al., 136 Okla. 72 , 276 Pac. 215 , and cases therein cited. Wayne L.

Thomas v. Morgan

132 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1928

MASON, V. C. J. … Brown v. Marks, 45 Okla. 711 , 146 Pac. 707 ; Abraham v. Roland Oil Co., 127 Okla. 255 , 260 Pac. 771 ; Arkansas Fertilizer Co. v. Brattin, 127 Okla. 9 , 260 Pac. 43 .

Board of County Commissioners v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

342 P.2d 552 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1959

This is an appeal by the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, from a judgment in its favor for an amount less than prayed for. … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and HALLEY, JOHNSON, BLACKBIRD and BERRY, J.J., concur.

Midwest City v. Cravens

532 P.2d 829 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 1975

(Goodwin v. Oklahoma City (1947), 199 Okl. 26 , 182 P. 2d 762 ); (3) The administration of municipal police and fire departments are matters of lo *832 cal municipal concern. (State ex rel. Brown v. … The Legislature has, in effect, delegated to the Board, legislative powers which it alone could exercise. In Atchley v.

Wilson v. Board of Com'rs of Mayes County

112 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 13, 1925

Brown, county judge of Mayes county, appointed the appellant, Martha J. Wilson, as county court stenographer and ex-officio deputy court clerk. The said Martha J. … In the case of Thomas v.

Caldwell v. Board of Com'rs of Noble County

34 Okla. 265 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 18, 1912

The authority of the board of county commissioners to make the order above referred to was settled in Bostick v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 19 Okla. 92 , 91 Pac. 1125 . … The rule announced by the Supreme Court of the territory in Alva State Bank v. Renfrew, 10 Okla. 26 , 62 Pac. 285 , and Streight v.

State Ex Rel. Murphy v. Board of Ed.

185 Okla. 655 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 1939

WELCH, V. C. J. This appeal involves the expenditure of the same funds as was involved in the case of the Board of Education of the City of Oklahoma City, a Municipal Corporation, v. Dr. H. H.

Board of Com'rs of Atoka County v. Wills

159 Okla. 266 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1932

Plaintiffs, some 139 individuals, instituted suit against the board of county commissioners of Atoka county, seeking |to have the action of said board, wherein the board established live stock district No-. 5 ini said county … In the case of City National Bank v.