Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

1.12s

  • State Board of Medical Examiners v. Plager

    118 N.J.L. 434 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 1937

    Evening Journal Association v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N. J. L. 36; Hackensack Trust Co. v. Hackensack, 116 Id. 343; 384 Atl. Rep. 408 . … The proofs here exhibited are entirely unlike those which are disclosed in the case of State Board of Medical Examiners v. Baker, 10 N. J. Mis. R. 663; 160 Atl.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Board of Health v. Schwarz Bros.

    86 N.J.L. 170 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Linden Board of Education v. Linden Education Ass'n

    202 N.J. 268 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 2010

    The *275 Trust Co. of New Jersey, 105 N.J. 442, 453 , 522 A.2d 992 (1987), Scotch Plains-Fanwood Board of Education v. … State, Office of Employee Relations v. Commc’ns Workers of Am., 154 N.J. 98, 111 , 711 A.2d 300 (1998); N.J. Tpk.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education

    223 N.J. 285 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 20, 2015

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Finnegan v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    131 N.J.L. 276 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1944

    Montgomery v. Trenton, 40 N. J. L. 89. … Montclair Savings B ank v. Sylvester, 122 N. J. Eq. 518. The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals is accordingly affirmed, with costs.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Puchalski v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    55 N.J. 113 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1969

    Mastriana v. New Jersey Parole Board, 95 N. J. Super. 351 (App. … While the constitutional right to the assignment of counsel where probation is *116 sought to be revoked seems to he established (Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U. S. 128 , 88 S. Ct. 254 , 19 L. Ed. 2d 336 (1967); State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Miller

    145 N.J. Super. 222 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 23, 1976

    Moorestown Tp. v. Armstrong, 89 N. J. Super. 560 (App. Div. 1965), certif. den. 47 N. J. 80 (1966). The Civil Service Commission erred in reducing the penalty to a six-month suspension and ordering mitigated back pay.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fox v. Board of Education of Newark

    130 N.J.L. 531 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 16, 1943

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Monterey Estates, Inc. v. Planning Board

    231 N.J. Super. 78 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 24, 1989

    See Service Armament Co. v. Hyland, 70 N.J. 550, 556 (1976).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mack International Motor Truck Corp.

    10 N.J. Misc. 1035 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 17, 1932

    The Mack Truck Corporation issued a writ of replevin to recover possession of a truck from Nathan Brown, and in the writ demanded that Brown commence an action and file a state of demand showing the amount claimed by him. … Melier v. Fageol Co., 9 N. J. Mis. R. 37; 152 Atl. Rep. 642 . The case will go back for a proper trial with opportunity afforded counsel to present their evidence on all phases of the case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cory v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    44 N.J.L. 445 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1882

    In the case of Jones v. Carry, 6 Bing. N. C. 247, this consideration- appears to have had weight. … Another authority in the same vein is that of Staples v. Holdsworth, 4 Bing. N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • New Jersey State Parole Board v. Baldwin

    89 N.J. 431 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 16, 1982

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • DePinto v. Bayonne Board of Education

    514 F. Supp. 2d 633 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 17, 2007

    See FCC v. … Walz v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bowers v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    127 N.J.L. 471 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 15, 1941

    In pursuance therewith the defendant Board of Chosen Ereeholders adopted on August 21st, 1941, the resolution under attack appropriating funds to cover the cost of maintenance of the said courts. … Middleton v. Robbins, 53 N. J. L. 555; Daniel B. Frazier Co. v. Harvey Cedars, 111 Id. 163.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vanderbach v. Hudson County Board of Taxation

    135 N.J.L. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 20, 1947

    On July 23d, 1942, the Governor removed from office the then members of the Hudson County Board of Taxation and, on the same day, appointed an entirely new board. … On July 24th, 1942, the members of the new board were sworn in and thereupon attempted to take possession of the offices of the Hudson County Board of Taxation.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Mack-International Motor Truck Corp.

    10 N.J. Misc. 125 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1932

    So much was specifically held as to proceedings to review judicial action under this very act in the case of Ackerman v. Bloomingdale, 147 Atl. Rep. 444 . The appeal will be dismissed, with costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jersey Triangle Corp. v. Board of Adjustment

    127 N.J.L. 194 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 25, 1941

    The second ground stated for denial is wholly without merit in fact as well as in law since the landowner joined in the supplemental application made to the Board of Adjustment and in Brown v. Terhune, 18 Atl. … In Durkin Lumber Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 106 N. J.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Van Riper v. Essex Public Road Board

    38 N.J.L. 23 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1875

    That supplement, in many material respects, altered the powers originally conferred upon the road board, and the methods of their proceedings. … This leading effect was to confine the road board to the construction of six avenues, giving it, as an incidental power, the right to lay out new roads upon the application of the land-owners.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Veghte

    44 N.J.L. 509 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1882

    A’Court v. Cross, 3 Bing. 329; Bell v. Morrison, 1 Pet. 351 ; Belles v. Belles, 7 Halst. 339; Van Dike v. Van Dike, 3 Green 289, 297. … In that respect, the case was decided in accord with Short v. McCarthy, 3 B.& Ald. 626, and Brown v. Howard, 2 Bro. & B. 72. See, also, Howell v. Young, 5 B. & C. 259. So, in Clark v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board

    209 N.J. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 14, 2012

    39 A.3d 200 (2012) 209 N.J. 595 RILEY v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD. C-714 September Term 2011, 069327 Supreme Court of New Jersey. March 14, 2012. Petition for Certification Granted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.