Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.37s
Fuqua v. Rockingham County Board of Social Services
125 N.C. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1997
Amanini v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C. App. 668, 673 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 117 (1994). … See Eury v. *74 N.C. Employment Security Comm., 115 N.C.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCoppedge v. Franklin County Board of Education
345 F. Supp. 2d 567 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 5, 2004
See,, e.g., Lee v. Lee County Bd. of Ed., No. 3:70-CV-00-845-MHT-DRB. According to the Lee v. Lee County Board of Education docket, at least four motions were filed requesting interim attorney fees. See Lee v. … Browne for Attorney's Fees”) (filed 1/11/99), [DE-62](Supplemented Abridged Motion by Plaintiffs for Interim Award of Attorney's Fees and Expenses”) (filed 1/11/199), [DE-63] ("Motion by Anthony T.
Cited 3 timesPublishedStudent Bar Ass'n Board of Governors v. Byrd
32 N.C. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1977
Each Board of Trustees has such powers as it may be delegated by the Board of Governors. G.S. 116-33. … He is responsible for carrying out policies of the Board of Governors and Board of Trustees.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCox v. North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board
47 N.C. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980
Board of Transportation v. … so as to bring the shareholder within the “owner” exemption provisions of our real estate brokers and salesmen licensing statutes is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court of Virginia in Grenco Real Estate Inv. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished150 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2002
Turner v. Norfolk S. Corp., 137 N.C. … Co. v. Pennington, 141 N.C.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLove v. Alamance County Board of Education
581 F. Supp. 1079 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 29, 1984
Harnett County Board of Education, 684 F.2d 304 (4th Cir.1982) and Knighton v. … Asheboro City Board of Education, 393 F.2d 736 (4th Cir.1968) and Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir.1966).
Cited 3 timesPublishedWatkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners
358 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2004
The first issue presented is whether the Board was authorized, under Leahy v. … . *207 Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co., 254 N.C. 47, 57 , 118 S.E.2d 303, 310 (1961); see also Gill v. Board of Comm’rs of Wake Cty, 160 N.C. 176, 188 , 76 S.E. 203, 208 (1912).
Cited 40 timesPublished335 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1993
Cited 3 timesPublishedNo opinion textCannady v. Person County Board of Education
375 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 27, 1974
In two landmark cases, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … This conclusion is reenforced by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s most recent decision in this area, Williams v. Hyde County Board of Education, supra. C. In Perry v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRoyal Indemnity Co. v. Board of Education
143 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 7, 1956
National Surety Co. v. County Board of Education, 4 Cir., 15 F.2d 993 ; Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Coggin, 4 Cir., 78 F.2d 471 . … Walling v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., 4 Cir., 162 F.2d 95 ; Ewing v. Gardner, 341 U.S. 321 , 71 S.Ct. 684 , 95 L.Ed. 968 . As to interest see United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMitchell v. Board of Trustees of Township No. 8
71 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874
Such; things must usually be left to the Board. If they are extravagant, the ballot-box is the appropriate remedy. … But the counsel on both sides had overlooked the fact that-the statute, supra, authorizing the Board to levy and collect taxes for necessary expenses has been repealed, and the Board is forbidden to levy and collect taxes
Cited 7 timesPublished62 N.C. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983
See also, State v. Hill, 31 N.C. App. 248 , 229 S.E. 2d 810 (1976). First, as we said in State v. Morris, 59 N.C. … State v. Ahearn, 307 N.C. 584 , 300 S.E. 2d 689 (1983). Remanded for resentencing. Judges Wells and EAGLES concur.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation
57 N.C. App. 392 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1982
See McRae v. … See Dayton v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCalabria v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
361 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2006
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcLaughlin v. North Carolina Board of Elections
850 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 19, 1994
Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 729 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1278-1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. at 145 , 92 S.Ct. at 856-857 ; Jenness, 403 U.S. at 442 , 91 S.Ct. at 1976 ; Williams v. … See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). 16 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
210 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936
Hayes v. Hickory, 208 N. C., 845 , and cases there cited. Affirmed. ClaricsoN, J., not sitting.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWake Cares, Inc. v. Wake County School Board
655 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 2007
WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Lori Milberg, Horace J. … Tanner, Christine Scheef, Raleigh, for Wake School Board, et al.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCapital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment
146 N.C. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2001
See Avant v. Sandhills Ctr. for Mental Health, 132 N.C. … See Hedgepeth v. N. C. Div. of Servs. for the Blind, 142 N.C.
Reversed by Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment, 355 N.C. 269 (2002)Cited 27 timesPublishedSibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy Examiners
357 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 2003
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 14, 2024
BROWN, et al., ) ORDER ) Defendants. ) ________________ … P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna