Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

5.37s

  • Fuqua v. Rockingham County Board of Social Services

    125 N.C. App. 66 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1997

    Amanini v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C. App. 668, 673 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 117 (1994). … See Eury v. *74 N.C. Employment Security Comm., 115 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Coppedge v. Franklin County Board of Education

    345 F. Supp. 2d 567 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 5, 2004

    See,, e.g., Lee v. Lee County Bd. of Ed., No. 3:70-CV-00-845-MHT-DRB. According to the Lee v. Lee County Board of Education docket, at least four motions were filed requesting interim attorney fees. See Lee v. … Browne for Attorney's Fees”) (filed 1/11/99), [DE-62](Supplemented Abridged Motion by Plaintiffs for Interim Award of Attorney's Fees and Expenses”) (filed 1/11/199), [DE-63] ("Motion by Anthony T.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Student Bar Ass'n Board of Governors v. Byrd

    32 N.C. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1977

    Each Board of Trustees has such powers as it may be delegated by the Board of Governors. G.S. 116-33. … He is responsible for carrying out policies of the Board of Governors and Board of Trustees.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cox v. North Carolina Real Estate Licensing Board

    47 N.C. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

    Board of Transportation v. … so as to bring the shareholder within the “owner” exemption provisions of our real estate brokers and salesmen licensing statutes is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court of Virginia in Grenco Real Estate Inv. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Darroch v. Lea

    150 N.C. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2002

    Turner v. Norfolk S. Corp., 137 N.C. … Co. v. Pennington, 141 N.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Love v. Alamance County Board of Education

    581 F. Supp. 1079 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Feb 29, 1984

    Harnett County Board of Education, 684 F.2d 304 (4th Cir.1982) and Knighton v. … Asheboro City Board of Education, 393 F.2d 736 (4th Cir.1968) and Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir.1966).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners

    358 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 2004

    The first issue presented is whether the Board was authorized, under Leahy v. … . *207 Faizan v. Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co., 254 N.C. 47, 57 , 118 S.E.2d 303, 310 (1961); see also Gill v. Board of Comm’rs of Wake Cty, 160 N.C. 176, 188 , 76 S.E. 203, 208 (1912).

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Flanders v. Gabriel

    335 N.C. 234 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 3, 1993

    Cited 3 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Cannady v. Person County Board of Education

    375 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Mar 27, 1974

    In two landmark cases, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … This conclusion is reenforced by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s most recent decision in this area, Williams v. Hyde County Board of Education, supra. C. In Perry v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Royal Indemnity Co. v. Board of Education

    143 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 7, 1956

    National Surety Co. v. County Board of Education, 4 Cir., 15 F.2d 993 ; Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Coggin, 4 Cir., 78 F.2d 471 . … Walling v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., 4 Cir., 162 F.2d 95 ; Ewing v. Gardner, 341 U.S. 321 , 71 S.Ct. 684 , 95 L.Ed. 968 . As to interest see United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Board of Trustees of Township No. 8

    71 N.C. 400 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

    Such; things must usually be left to the Board. If they are extravagant, the ballot-box is the appropriate remedy. … But the counsel on both sides had overlooked the fact that-the statute, supra, authorizing the Board to levy and collect taxes for necessary expenses has been repealed, and the Board is forbidden to levy and collect taxes

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Thompson

    62 N.C. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1983

    See also, State v. Hill, 31 N.C. App. 248 , 229 S.E. 2d 810 (1976). First, as we said in State v. Morris, 59 N.C. … State v. Ahearn, 307 N.C. 584 , 300 S.E. 2d 689 (1983). Remanded for resentencing. Judges Wells and EAGLES concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

    57 N.C. App. 392 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 1, 1982

    See McRae v. … See Dayton v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Calabria v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    361 N.C. 166 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 2006

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. North Carolina Board of Elections

    850 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 19, 1994

    Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 729 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1278-1279 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. at 145 , 92 S.Ct. at 856-857 ; Jenness, 403 U.S. at 442 , 91 S.Ct. at 1976 ; Williams v. … See Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1282 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). 16 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

    210 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1936

    Hayes v. Hickory, 208 N. C., 845 , and cases there cited. Affirmed. ClaricsoN, J., not sitting.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wake Cares, Inc. v. Wake County School Board

    655 S.E.2d 403 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 2007

    WAKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Lori Milberg, Horace J. … Tanner, Christine Scheef, Raleigh, for Wake School Board, et al.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment

    146 N.C. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2001

    See Avant v. Sandhills Ctr. for Mental Health, 132 N.C. … See Hedgepeth v. N. C. Div. of Servs. for the Blind, 142 N.C.

    Reversed by Capital Outdoor, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of Adjustment, 355 N.C. 269 (2002)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Sibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy Examiners

    357 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 28, 2003

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Linder v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 14, 2024

    BROWN, et al., ) ORDER ) Defendants. ) ________________ … P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”); Link v. Wabash R.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.