Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.36s
Liddell v. BD. OF ED., CITY OF ST. LOUIS, ETC.
469 F. Supp. 1304 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 12, 1979
Brown I was followed by Brown v. … However, notwithstanding the actions taken by the Board subsequent to Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. De Vore
517 S.W.2d 480 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1974
State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, supra. … Section 161.-272; State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, supra.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMagenheim v. Board of Education of the School District of Riverview Gardens
347 S.W.2d 409 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1961
Bergmann et al. v. Board of Education of Normandy Consolidated School Dist. et al., 360 Mo. 644 , 230 S.W.2d 714 . … Wood v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 357 Mo. 147 , 206 S.W.2d 566, 568 , and in State ex rel. Brown et al. v. Board of Education of City of St.
Cited 33 timesPublished801 S.W.2d 447 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1990
State v. Ring, 346 Mo. 290 , 141 S.W.2d 57, 64-5 (banc 1940); State v. Brown, 542 S.W.2d 789, 792 (Mo.App.1976). … State v. Falkner, supra; State v. Brown, supra.
Abrogated on other grounds by State v. Withrow, 1999 Mo. LEXIS 75 (1999)Cited 14 timesPublishedState ex rel. Blair v. Center Creek Mining Co.
262 Mo. 490 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 2, 1914
BROWN, C. … The foregoing opinion of Brown, 0., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All the judges concur.
Cited 14 timesPublished155 Mo. 577 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1900
That case is Brown v. Baldwin & Gleason Co., 13 N. Y. … We do not construe the decision in Brown v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedState ex rel. Goodman v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners
181 S.W.3d 156 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2005
Hunter v. Lippold, 142 S.W.3d 241, 242 (Mo.App. W.D.2004). … LaRocca v. LaRocca, 135 S.W.3d 522, 524 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).
Cited 2 timesPublishedThe Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Missouri Baptist Foundation
497 S.W.3d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 2016
In Executive Board of Missouri Baptist Convention v. Carnahan, 170 S.W.3d 437 (Mo. App. … Bone v.
Cited 6 timesPublished231 S.W.3d 236 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2007
The Homeowners subsequently filed their initial petition and their first amended petition against the City, Novus, Novus *240 Equities Company, Mainstreet at Sunset, L.L.C., Novus-Sunset, L.L.C., Jonathan Browne, Lisa Browne … Although the Homeowners’ second amended petition also named as defendants Novus Equities Company, No-vus Development Company, Mainstreet at Sunset, L.L.C., Novus-Sunset, L.L.C., Jonathan Browne, and Lisa Browne (collectively
Cited 20 timesPublished62 Mo. 577 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1876
Dillon was in possession, and afterwards, in 1865, sold the property to Hulse, one of the defendants, who subsequently conveyed a portion of it to Brown, the other.defendant. *578 "When the deed from Mrs.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTaussig v. St. Louis & Kirkwood Railroad
166 Mo. 28 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 17, 1901
Rep. 335; Brown v. *35 Silver Mines, 17 Colo. 421 ; Greenesboro Company v. Stratton, 120 Ind. 296 ; Santa Clara Min. Ass’n v. Meredith, 49 Md. 389 ; Rogers v. Railroad, 22 Minn. 25 ; Shackelford v. … [Chandler v. Monmouth Bank, 1 Green (N. J.) 255; Shackleford v. Railroad, 37 Miss. 202 ; New Orleans, etc., Co. v. Brown, 36 La. Ann. 138 ; Cheeney v. Railroad, 68 Ill. 570 ; Henry v. Railroad, 27 Vt. 435 ; Polk v.
Cited 25 timesPublished756 S.W.2d 945 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1988
Brown has not appeared on appeal to contend otherwise. Brown’s motion to dismiss was erroneously sustained. Empire Gas Corporation does contend the petition was properly dismissed. … Blades v. Cinder Block Co., 10 S.W.2d 319 , 320 (Mo.App.1928). Also see Aman Collection Service, Inc. v. Burgess, 612 S.W.2d 405 (Mo.App.1981); Martin v. Signal Dodge, Inc., 444 S.W.2d 29 (Mo.App.1969); Orona v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSurendra Chaganti v. Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
463 S.W.3d 391 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2015
State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, the Supreme Court recognized a definition of "unprofessional conduct" used in Perez v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 803 S.W.2d 160, 164 (Mo. … See Merwin v. State Bd. of Registration for Healing Arts, 399 S.W.3d 110, 117 (Mo.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGaydos Ex Rel. SS Peter & Paul's Catholic Church Cemetery Board v. Imhoff
245 S.W.3d 303 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 19, 2008
Eisele v. Meyers, 929 S.W.2d 752, 755 (Mo.App.1996). … Klemme v. Best, 941 S.W.2d 493, 497 (Mo.banc 1997).
Cited 11 timesPublishedLiddell v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis
686 F. Supp. 235 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 10, 1988
686 F.Supp. 235 (1988) Craton LIDDELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, et al., Defendants. No. 72-0100C(5). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. … Kenneth V. Byrne, St. Louis, Mo., for Valley Park. MEMORANDUM LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilson v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
122 Mo. App. 667 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1907
[Nolan v. Johns, 126 Mo. 159, 166 ; Minter v. Bradstreet Co., 174 Mo. 444, 491 .] “The court is not required in a civil case to instruct on all questions whether suggested or not.” [Browning v. … App. 635 ; Construction Co. v. Railway, 71 Mo. App. 626 ; Schlotzhauer v. Railway, 89 Mo. App. 65 ; Brown v. Transit Co., 108 Mo. App. 310, 315 ; Lackland v. Railway, 101 Mo. App. 420, 428 .]
Cited 11 timesPublishedWilson ex rel. Wilson v. Stephens
757 S.W.2d 297 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1988
Guthrie v. Brown Quarries, Inc., 741 S.W.2d 738, 739 [2] (Mo.App.1987). … In Kanagawa v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. J.C. Nichols Co. v. Boley
853 S.W.2d 923 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 25, 1993
Kelley v. Mitchell, 595 S.W.2d 261, 266-67 (Mo. banc 1980), quoting State ex rel. Brunjes v. Linville, 8 S.W.2d 623 (Mo.1928). … See also State ex rel. *925 Brown v. Antonio, 489 S.W.2d 193, 194 (Mo. banc 1973). The writ is hereby quashed without prejudice to the appeal now pending in the State Tax Commission. All concur. .
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna