Case law

Vizzina v. City of Birmingham

533 So. 2d 652 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 24, 1987

While we now disapprove of the language in Brown that the reverse side of an "Operational Procedure" card purporting to be "certified by state board of health officer and records custodian Ira L. … Myers," was a proper authentication of the document, the result in Brown is correct.

Brown v. Hayder (INMATE 2)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 2, 2025

McNair v. Johnson, 143 F.4th 1301, 1306–07 (11th Cir. 2025) (cleaned up). … Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629–30 (1962); see also Moon v.

Thompson v. Board of Commrs. of the State Bar

216 Ala. 694 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1927

Thompson v. Board of Commissioners of the State Bar, 112 So. 919 . 1 After a careful consideration of the evidence in this cause, while this appellant was the law partner of her father, Von L. … Thompson, and was indirectly interested in the matters charged to him, we do not think it is sufficiently established that she was conscious of his conduct or the result of same, and that the board of commissioners was in

Alabama Department of Environmental Management v. Water Works & Sewer Board

623 So. 2d 1061 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 25, 1993

The Board has filed a brief in *1063 support of ADEM’s petition. … For example, in Pucket v.

Henri-Duval Winery, LLC v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

26 So. 3d 1149 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 1, 2009

Dark's Dairy v. Alabama State Milk Control Board

281 Ala. 293 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 17, 1967

White Way Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control Board, 265 Ala. 660 , 93 So.2d 509 . … Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Roberts, 274 Ala. 256 , 147 So.2d 822 (1962) involved a bill seeking preliminary or interlocutory relief.

Browning v. City of Gadsden

359 So. 2d 361 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1978

In McGruder v. … The McGruder rationale has been followed by this court in Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County v. Reynolds , 294 Ala. 21 , 310 So.2d 876 (1975), and Blackmon v.

Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.

370 So. 2d 1384 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 25, 1979

See Lollar v. Alabama Power Company , supra; Odom v. Linsey , 365 So.2d 664 , (Ala. 1978); Hogan v. Alabama Power Company , 351 So.2d 1378 (Ala.Civ.App. 1977), cert. denied , 351 So.2d 1388 (Ala. 1977). … Winn-Dixie v. Godwin , 349 So.2d 37 (Ala. 1977); May-Bilt, Inc. v. Deese , 281 Ala. 579 , 206 So.2d 590 (1967).

Baldwin County Eastern Shore Hospital Board, Inc. v. Windham

706 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Feb 21, 1989

First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lake Worth v. Brown, 707 F.2d 1217, 1221 (11th Cir 1983). … Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Company, 633 F.Supp. 43, 45 (S.D.Ala.1986); See also, Moore v.

State Ex Rel. Conrad v. Board of Revenue & Road Com'rs

231 Ala. 18 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1935

Appellant filed his petition for mandamus in the circuit court of Mobile county against the Board of Revenue and Road Commissioners of said county, and the individual members of said board, seeking to require them to issue … In the last-mentioned case Chief Justice Anderson called attention to the fact that the holding in the case of Henry v. Wilson, supra, was in apparent conflict with the case of Board of Revenue v.

Ex Parte Montgomery

244 Ala. 91 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 25, 1943

Coplon v. State, 15 Ala.App. 331 (8 and 9), 73 So. 225 ; Pellum v. State, 89 Ala. 28 , 8 So. 83 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Dewell, 123 Fla. 785 , 167 So. 687 ; 24 Am.Jur. 866, § 49. … Brown v. Dewell, supra; note 127 A.L.R. 281 et seq.; United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 , (37), 60 S.Ct. 811, 849 , 84 L.Ed. 1129 ; Metzler v. United States, 9 Cir., 64 F.2d 203 .

Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County v. Ardis

575 So. 2d 1125 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 28, 1990

In district court, judgment was entered in favor of the Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County (the Board). … The Board now appeals. At the outset, we note that we were recently called on to interpret this same act in the case of Brown v.

Taxpayers & Citizens v. Board of Water & Sewer Commissioners

275 Ala. 349 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1963

See City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, 258 Ala. 669 , 64 So.2d 824 ; Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. … City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra; Taxpayers and Citizens of City of Mobile v. Board of Water and Sewer Com’rs of City of Mobile, supra.

Board of Revenue v. State ex rel. Wiley

199 Ala. 260 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1917

We think that the qualification fixed by the act is sanctioned by this court in the case of Finklea v. Farish, 160 Ala. 230 , 49 South. 366 , and which said case was reaffirmed in the case of State, ex rel. Brassell v. … Teasley, 194 Ala. 574 , 69 South. 723 , wherein it was pointed out that the case of Kentz v.

Gary Powers Development, Inc. v. State Home Builders Licensure Board

852 So. 2d 778 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 4, 2002

See Thomas Learning Ctr., Inc. v. McGuirk, 766 So.2d 161, 169 (Ala.Civ.App.1998) (citing J & M Indus., Inc. v. Huguley Oil Co., 546 So.2d 367, 368 (Ala.1989), quoting in turn Cooper v. … FDIC v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the United States, 289 Ala. 192, 196 , 266 So.2d 752, 754 (1972); Wilson v. Wilson, 53 Ala.App. 194, 198 , 298 So.2d 616, 619 (1973); see also Alabama Power Co. v.

Maye v. Alabama Department of Youth Services & Alabama State Personnel Board

90 So. 3d 766 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 24, 2012

In Brunson v. Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners, 69 So.3d 913 (Ala.Civ. … Safety, 7 So.3d 1035 (Ala.Civ.App. 2008); Eitzen v. Medical Licensure Comm’n of Alabama, 709 So.2d 1239, 1240 (Ala.Civ.App.1998); and State Dep’t of Human Res. v. Funk, supra.

Alabama State Tenure Commission v. Conecuh County Board of Education

495 So. 2d 1108 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 7, 1986

The tenure statutes do not provide for any alternative procedure where the board is found to be too biased to conduct a hearing. … In light of the board members’ strong statements that a hearing would not affect their decision to terminate Gantt’s employment, the board’s argument, that the Court of Civil Appeals’ findings do not support a conclusion

Alabama Board of Examiners of Landscape Architects v. Bostick

211 So. 3d 836 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 10, 2016

State Board of Optometry v. Lee Optical Co. of Ala.

284 Ala. 562 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 18, 1969

From that decree the State Board of Optometry, the complainant below, appealed to this court. … Skains v. Barnes, supra; Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Green, supra; Fuqua v. Fuqua, supra; Cutter v. Waddingham, 33 Mo. 269 ; Berry v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.

Waterworks & Sewer Board of the City of Selma v. Allen

3 So. 3d 846 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 15, 2008

“In Kid’s Care, Inc. v. … Board of Trs. of Alabama State Univ., 703 So.2d 335 (Ala.1997); Gilbert v. Wells, 473 So.2d 1042 (Ala.1985).