Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

10,000+ results

1.50s

  • Jensen, Madison Jody the Estate of v. Duchesne County

    District Court, D. Utah · Sep 15, 2022

    immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’” … Gomez, 745 F.3d 405, 411 (10th Cir. 2014) (“The plaintiff “bear[s] the ultimate burden of persuasion at trial to overcome qualified immunity by showing a violation of clearly established federal law.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Losleben v. Oppedahl

    319 Mont. 269 · Montana Supreme Court · Jan 28, 2004

    Did the District Court err in granting Defendant Capp qualified immunity on the basis that it was not clearly established at the time of Losleben’s discharge from employment that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection … , Capp was entitled to qualified immunity

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Warr v. Liberatore

    District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 29, 2019

    Qualified Immunity “The doctrine of qualified immunity shields officials from civil liability so long as their conduct ‘does not violate clearly established statutory or … was ‘clearly established’ at the time of defendant’s alleged misconduct.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Boudjerada v. City of Eugene

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 26, 2024

    Relatedly, Defendants point out that the F&R does not include a discussion of qualified immunity as to Medary and Skinner for Plaintiffs’ Third Claim, despite qualified immunity having been raised in Defendants’ … established.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • RAYNER v. THE COUNTY OF CHESTER

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 2025

    Sept. 1, 2020) (“Because a Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process right against malicious prosecution was not clearly established in 2008—and is still not clearly established for that matter—the Court grants qualified … “If a court concludes that an officer's conduct did violate a clearly established constitutional right, then it must deny him the protection afforded by qualified immunity.” Curley, 298 F.3d at 277.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kennedy v. Dexter Consolidated Schools

    129 N.M. 436 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2000

    immunity for the strip-to-undergarments search of Randy Ford because while that search violated his rights, those rights were not “clearly established” in 1992; (2) two Defendants deserved qualified immunity because their … QUALIFIED IMMUNITY {10} All Defendants assert that qualified immunity insulates them from liability.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Banks v. Jones

    575 S.W.3d 111 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 6, 2019

    Public officials are entitled to qualified immunity from damages under Section 1983 unless they transgress "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." … Banks is entitled to qualified immunity unless (1) the facts alleged, construed in a light most favorable to Jones, establish a violation of a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) the right was clearly established at

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Cason Cunningham v. Norm Kramer

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 13, 2019

    Baldwin, 109 F.3d 557, 560-61 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal on the basis of qualified immunity). We affirm. … See Ashcroft v. al- Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 735 (2011) (explaining two-part test for qualified immunity); Hines v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Fayetteville v. Romine

    373 Ark. 318 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 2008

    violation, demonstrated the constitutional right is clearly established, and raised a genuine issue of fact as to whether the official would have known that the conduct violated that clearly established right. … his conduct violated that clearly established right.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Rowe

    District Court, N.D. Texas · Jan 4, 2022

    Serpas, 745 F.3d 767, 771 (Sth Cir. 2014) (“Once the defendant raises the qualified immunity defense, ‘the burden shifts to the plaintiff to rebut this defense by establishing that the official’s allegedly wrongful conduct … violated clearly established law.’”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • The Estate of Gary Brannon v. Franklin

    District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 6, 2024

    Qualified immunity immunizes Sheriff Franklin from liability if the Second Amended Complaint fails to state a violation of a “clearly established statutory or constitutional right[] of which a reasonable person would have … “It is therefore appropriate for a district court to grant the defense of qualified immunity at the motion to dismiss stage if the complaint ‘fails to allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right.’

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Losh v. Fabian

    592 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 4, 2010

    Only rulings in Supreme Court decisions issued before the state court acts are considered clearly established federal law, id. at 412 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , for a state court does not act contrary to or unreasonably apply clearly … Losh disagrees, arguing that Jimenez merely applied an "old rule," which was clearly established federal law at the time her case was decided.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sims v. Diaz

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 2021

    was “clearly established” at the time of the alleged misconduct. … 27 Fever spores—was not clearly established at the time”); Horton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pittsley

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 1, 2025

    of showing that the 27 rights allegedly violated were ‘clearly established.’” … constitutes an Eighth Amendment violation, defendant is entitled 12 to qualified immunity. 13 Qualified immunity protects “all but the plainly 14 incompetent or those who knowingly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robert Harper v. County of Delaware

    Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 12, 2019

    And for qualified immunity purposes, 3 The individual defendants argued below that they were entitled to qualified immunity. … The Municipal Defendants Our conclusion that the right Harper claims was not clearly established does not resolve his claims against the municipal defendants, which cannot assert a qualified immunity defense to

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Clark v. Cole <b> <font color="RED"> Do Not File in this Case - Case Consolidated, file in Case No. 18-CV-03241-SRB . </b> </font>

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 30, 2018

    that right was clearly established at the time of the employee’s firing.” … Regarding step two of the qualified immunity analysis, “[f]or a constitutional right to be clearly established, its contours ‘must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Denton v. Cole <b> <font color="RED"> Do Not File in this Case - Case Consolidated, file in Case No. 18-CV-03241-SRB . </b> </font>

    District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 30, 2018

    that right was clearly established at the time of the employee’s firing.” … Regarding step two of the qualified immunity analysis, “[f]or a constitutional right to be clearly established, its contours ‘must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bailey v. Michigan Department of Corrections

    District Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 25, 2023

    “Unless the plaintiff's allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery.” Crawford v. … The Seventh Circuit affirmed the denial of qualified immunity, reasoning that a claim for inadequate ventilation was clearly established and plaintiffs plausibly alleged a violation of their rights.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Maurice Moore v. Dr. John Duffy

    255 F.3d 543 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 6, 2001

    Duffy’s conduct was not objectively reasonable under clearly established law. Dr. Duffy contends on appeal that he is entitled to qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity shields government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 45 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.