Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

4.08s

  • Fred Auston Wortman, III v. Eric Shirkey

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 17, 2024

    Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc., 328 S.W.3d 850, 854 (Tenn. 2010); Highwoods Props., Inc. v. City of Memphis, 297 S.W.3d at 700. … The parole board’s decision whether to grant parole is reviewable by writ of certiorari “to determine whether the Board has exceeded its jurisdiction, or has acted illegally, fraudulently or arbitrarily.” Robinson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southland Mall, Inc. v. Garner

    324 F. Supp. 674 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 27, 1971

    OPINION AND ORDER BAILEY BROWN, Chief Judge. … Board of Revision, supra; Charleston Fed. Sav. & Loan Assoc. v. Alderson, 324 U.S. 182 , 65 S.Ct. 624 , 89 L.Ed. 857 (1944).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Linnell Richmond v. Tennessee Department of Correction

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 29, 2010

    The petitioner inmate was convicted of a disciplinary offense by the Department of Correction disciplinary board. The inmate timely filed a petition in the trial court, challenging the legality of the board’s decision. … Brown v. Little, No. M2008-02644-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 2166061, at *2 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 20, 2009), perm. app. denied Jan. 25, 2010 (citing Rhoden v. State 5 (...continued) T.C.A. § 27-9-102 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laminite Plastics Mfg. Co. v. Greene

    561 S.W.2d 458 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1978

    Weight of the boards ranged from fifteen to twenty-five pounds. … Central Motor Express Inc. v. Burney, 214 Tenn. 118 , 377 S.W.2d 947 (1964); Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106 , 350 S.W.2d 65 (1961).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Leonora Washington v. Gale Vogel, Ph.D.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 20, 2011

    Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tenn.1993). … See Sullivan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wernert v. Williamson County Board of Education

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 18, 2025

    See White by Swafford v. … Diaz v. Mich. Dep’t of Corrs., 703 F.3d 956, 964 (6th Cir. 2013); see, e.g., Carten v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martinez v. Tennessee Board of Regents

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 2019

    June 23, 2014) (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). II. … See Mullins v. Smith, 14 F. Supp.2d 1009, 1011 (E.D. Mich. July 27, 1998); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Roberts v. Traughber

    844 S.W.2d 192 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 22, 1991

    We agree with Roberts’ statement of the law, see Goodwin v. Metropolitan Board of Health, 656 S.W.2d 383, 388 (Tenn.Ct.App.1983). … First Tennessee National Bank Ass’n v. Jones, 732 S.W.2d 281, 288 (Tenn.Ct.App.1987) (citing Southern Railway *197 Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 682 S.W.2d 196, 199 (Tenn.1984)).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Board of Equalization for Assessment of Railroad Property

    122 Tenn. 1 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

    Porter v. Rockford Railroad Co. ( 76 Ill., 561 ), supra; Law v. People, 87 Ill., 385 ; State Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U. S., 575 , 23 L. Ed., 663 ; City of Dubuque v. C., D. & M. Railroad Co., 47 Iowa, 196 . … See, also, State, ex rel., v. Chicago, Rock Island, Railroad Co., 162 Mo., 391 , 63 S. W., 495 ; St. Louis, Iron Mountain, etc., Railroad Co. v. Miller Co., 67 Ark., 498, 55 S. W., 926 ; Burlington Railroad Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herman v. United States

    73 F. Supp. 2d 912 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 28, 1999

    They formed a limited liability company, recruited a hospital board, and worked with various federal, state, and local officials to reopen the hospital. … It argues the case of Weitz v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Salem v. Tipton County Board of Education

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 20, 2025

    Defendant Tipton County Board of Education (“Defendant” or the “Board”) responded in opposition on July 10, 2025. (ECF No. 35.) The Magistrate Judge heard argument on the Motion on July 11, 2025. … EOG Res., Inc. v. Lucky Land Mgmt., LLC, 134 F.4th 868, 874 (6th Cir. 2025) (internal quotations omitted); see also D.T. v. Sumner Cnty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gerald Kiner v. Shelby County Government Public Records Department

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 29, 2025

    Brown v. Christian Bros. Univ., 428 S.W.3d 38, 46 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). This Court has held that “[p]arties who choose to represent themselves are entitled to fair and equal treatment by the courts.” Hodges v. Tenn. … The Board of Judicial Conduct (the “Board”) “is typically the proper forum for complaints against judges.” Bush, 631 S.W.3d at 13; see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 17-5-102(c).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas Marlin Roberts v. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 16, 2025

    See State v. … Agency v. Brown Stove Works, Inc., 637 S.W.2d 876, 880 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1982)). As primarily a matter of convenience, venue generally may be waived. Meighan, 924 S.W.2d at 639 (citing Tenn. R. Civ. P. 12.08).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schofield v. Gilland

    78 F.R.D. 279 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 31, 1975

    T.C.A. § 28-304; Brown v. Hipshire (Tenn.1977), 553 S.W.2d 570, 571 . … Rule 56(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Board of Ed., Cincinnati v. Department of H. E. W., C.A.6th (1976), 532 F.2d 1070, 1071 [1, 2].

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Paty v. McDaniel

    547 S.W.2d 897 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1977

    Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, 366 U.S., at 607 , 81 S.Ct., at 1148 . … As in West Virginia Board of Education v.

    Reversed on other grounds by McDaniel v. Paty, 435 U.S. 618 (1978)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re Danny K. DOCKERY

    970 S.W.2d 956 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1998

    Dockery v. Board of Professional Responsibility, 937 S.W.2d 863 (Tenn. 1996). … Dockery filed a response denying the allegations, asking to reopen the investigation regarding his suspension, and requesting damages from the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Royal Insurance v. R & R Drywall and Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 6, 2003

    See Memphis Publishing Co. v. Cherokee Children & Family Services, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 67 (Tenn. 2002); Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62 (Tenn. 2001). … Roberts v. Lebanon Appliance Service Co., 779 S.W.2d 793 (Tenn. 1989); Lindsey v. Smith and Johnson, Inc., 601 S.W.2d 923 (Tenn. 1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richard Kelly Smith v. Grady Perry, Warden

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 11, 2019

    Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015), casts doubt on the holding in Jackson”). Just as was the situation in Kenneth L. … “[T]he proper procedure to review actions of the Board of Paroles is not in a habeas corpus proceeding, but by petition for a common law writ of certiorari.” Luther Robert Brown, III v. State, No.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walker, Dionnie v. Clarksville Dep’t of Electricity

    2021 TN WC 256 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 17, 2021

    UPS v. Brown, No. M2014-01332-SC-R3-WC, 2015 Tenn. LEXIS 628, at *7-8 (Citations omitted) (Aug. 11, 2015). … However, the Appeals Board has held, “It is well-settled that the employee in a workers’ compensation claim has the burden of proof on all essential elements of the claim.” Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. Tennessee Board of Regents

    District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 6, 2020

    United States v. Curtis, 237 F.3d 598, 602 (6th Cir. 2001). … Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of Shelby Cty. Sch., 47 F. Supp. 3d 665, 674 (W.D. Tenn. 2014) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149, 106 S.Ct. 466, 472, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.