Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.87s

  • Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Hamburg Shirt Corporation

    371 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1966

    NLRB, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 215 , 363 F.2d 702 , 705, cert. denied, Aero Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 385 U.S. 973 , 87 S.Ct. 510 , 17 L.Ed.2d 436 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1966). 5 . Consolo v. … FMC, 383 U.S. 607, 621 , 86 S.Ct. 1018 , 16 L.Ed.2d 131 (1966); NLRB v. Seven-Up Bottling Co., 344 U.S. 344, 346-347 , 73 S.Ct. 287 , 97 L.Ed. 377 (1953); International Blid. of Operative Potters v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Washington Pension Union v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    322 F.2d 398 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

    This is another of the cases referred to in Labor Youth League v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 1 *decided April 25, 1963. … Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 , 81 S.Ct. 1857 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). 4 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Eagle Maintenance Services, Inc. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board

    893 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 2006

    As this court said in Belcon, Inc. v. … Eagle's reliance on John Reiner & Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Garvey v. National Transportation Safety Board

    190 F.3d 571 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 21, 1999

    Martin v. … It is also the position the FAA has consistently taken in litigation before the Board. See Administrator v. Gentile, S N.T.S.B. 60, 64 (1988); Administrator v. Wells, 1 N.T.S.B. 1472 , 1474 (1971).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Orient Express Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

    484 F.3d 554 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 2007

    Given our respect for the Transportation Board’s judgment in these matters, see Ass’n of Am. R.Rs. v. Surface Transp. … Although the Interstate Commerce Act does not define “common carrier,” the Transportation Board’s definition is the standard one. See Fla. Power & Light Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Concerned Citizens of Brentwood v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    634 A.2d 1234 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1993

    Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 570 A.2d 739, 746 (D.C.1990) (citations omitted); see Kopff v. … Accord, e.g., Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, supra, 570 A.2d at 746 ; United Unions, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 554 A.2d 313, 318 (D.C.1989); Wallick v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    411 F.3d 212 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 2005

    In evaluating this disciplinary action, the Board relied on the framework approved in NLRB v. … The Board ostensibly employed the framework set forth in Wright Line v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rhema Christian Center v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    515 A.2d 189 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1986

    Bright v. … Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners v. Rockmatt Corp., 231 So.2d 41, 44 (Fla.App.1970) (res judicata); Easley v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Berry v. McCarthy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 2021

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LYNN BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 374 (1998) (cleaned up). As a military review board, the ABCMR is entitled to even greater deference than civilian administrative agencies. Coe v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allentuck v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage & Industrial Safety Board

    264 A.2d 307 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1970

    Universal Camera Corp. v. … See also Braniff Airways, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Railway Express Agency Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    243 F.2d 422 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 28, 1957

    Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282, 288 , 54 S.Ct. 692 , 78 L.Ed. 1260 ; Lang v. … Railroad Commission of State of California, 2 Cal.2d 550 , 42 P.2d 639 ; Transcontinental Cases of 1922, 74 I.C.C. 48 , 68-71; All American Airways, Inc. v. Abilene and Southern Railway Co., 297 I.C.C. 313 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Superior Beverages, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    567 A.2d 1319 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1989

    Winchester Van Buren Tenants Ass’n v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 550 A.2d 51, 55 (D.C.1988) (quoting from Norwegian Nitrogen Co. v. … Id.; see also Guerra v. District of Columbia Rental Hous.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Energy Research Foundation v. Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

    734 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1990

    In determining whether the board is an agency this Court must follow the “sole function test,” enunciated in Soucie v. David, 448 F.2d 1067 (D.C.Cir.1971). See also Washington Research Project v. … Department of Health, Education and Welfare, supra; Public Citizen Health v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, supra; Pacific Legal Foundation v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Board

    803 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1992

    While the complaint is somewhat general, it attacks the action of the Board in granting a new FTZ which allegedly threatens to affect the business of an FTZ previously authorized and awarded by the Board to plaintiff in the … The FTZ Act is silent as to whether a Board action authorizing an FTZ is reviewable by any court.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Caldwell v. Employees Workers Compensation Appeals Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2018

    See, e.g., Spinelli v. Goss, 446 F.3d 159, 161 (D.C. … CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Employees' Compensation Appeals Board's motion to dismiss Mr. Caldwell's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kandel v. National Labor Relations Board

    265 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 2008

    On the merits, the Board found the Heartland Agreement did not violate section 8(e) and the petitioners filed a petition for review of the Board’s order. … Trades Council v. Sec’y of Def., 493 F.3d 201, 205 (D.C.Cir.2007) (quoting Rainbow/Push Coal. v. FCC, 396 F.3d 1235 , 1240 (D.C.Cir.2005) (quoting Lujan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anthony T. Koyce v. United States Board of Parole

    306 F.2d 759 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 24, 1962

    McGrath v. Kristensen, supra. … And see Stewart v. United States Board of Parole, 285 F.2d 421 (10th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 862 , 81 S.Ct. 830 , 5 L.Ed.2d 825 ; Easley v. United States, 257 F.2d 174 (10th Cir. 1958); Jones v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Corporate Express Delivery Systems v. National Labor Relations Board

    292 F.3d 777 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2002

    Van Lines, Inc. v. NLRB, 869 F.2d 596, 597 (D.C.Cir.1989) (NAVL). … Eastern, Inc. v. NLRB, 60 F.3d 855, 858 (D.C.Cir.1995). Accordingly, we take a middle course and “uphold the Board if it can be said to have made a choice between two fairly conflicting views.”

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Melodi Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Govenors

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 1, 2011

    At the time of the events under litigation, plaintiff Melodi Navab-Safavi worked as a contractor with the Broadcasting Board of Governors (“BBG” or “the Board”). … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968). See also Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hospital of Barstow, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    820 F.3d 440 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 29, 2016

    UC Health v. NLRB, 803 F.3d 669 (D.C. Cir. 2015); SSC Mystic Operating Co. v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 302 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … See id.; Noble Energy, Inc. v. Salazar, 671 F.3d 1241, 1245-46 (D.C. Cir. 2012); Oil, Chem. & Atomic Workers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 46 F.3d 82, 93 (D.C. Cir. 1995); Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 942 (D.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.