Case law

Opinion No. (1996)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1996

Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). ¶ 15 The Board's rule on training outside the United States goes beyond the Legislature's statutory provisions.

Boswell v. State

36 Okla. Crim. 265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1927

Brown claim to have gone to the home and, acting under the authority of the search warrant, claim to have searched the house of the de *267 fendant and found therein a small quantity of whisky, between a half gallon and a … Reinhart et al. v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 109 , 240 P. 1’9; Terry et al. v. State, 31 Okla. Cr. 91 , 237 P. 465 ; Hallmark v. State, 36 Okla. Cr. 236 , 253 P. 513 .

Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16

648 P.2d 26 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 8, 1982

The Minnesota Supreme Court was faced with the same problem and a similar statute in Morey v. School Board of Ind. Schl. Dist. … Winters v. Governor’s Special Committee, 441 P.2d 370, 372 (Okl.1967); Green v. Bd. of Com’rs. of Lincoln Co., 126 Okl. 300 , 259 P. 635, 637 (1927). 21 . Brown v. Banking Bd., 512 P.2d 166, 168 (Okl.1973).

Earls Ex Rel. Earls v. Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District

115 F. Supp. 2d 1281 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 9, 2000

Miller v. … Chandler v.

State Ex Rel. City of Stillwater v. Excise Board of Payne County

156 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1932

The excise board has no such authority. City of Woodward v. Reid, 143 Okla. 204 , 288 P. 458 . The power and duties of the excise board have recently been forcibly before this court. … OLARK, V. C. J., absent.

Opinion No. 68-287 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1968

Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 . A thorough study of 74 O.S. 500 .1 [ 74-500.1 ] (1961) et seq., as amended, fails to reveal any authority for reimbursement of turnpike fees. … These rules and regulations are subject to the approval of the State Board of Affairs.

State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners ex rel. Haning v. North

311 P.2d 223 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1957

Again in Hoffman v. … In Poulos v.

Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines v. Meister

330 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1958

Brown v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. … In Williams v.

Opinion No. 69-124 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 1969

All facilities and agencies of the State are under the Management and control of some state officer or group of officers in the form of board or commission. In the case of Brown v. … State Election Board, 369 P.2d 140 , our court quoted from Shaw v.

EDWARDS v. CITY OF SALLISAW

2014 OK 86 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2014

City of Yukon Discussed at Length 1941 OK 205, 114 P.2d 477, 189 Okla. 147, CONSTANT v. BROWN Discussed 1939 OK 375, 96 P.2d 534, 186 Okla. 174, CITY OF MUSKOGEE v. … LINN Discussed at Length 1946 OK 217, 172 P.2d 397, 197 Okla. 369, LATTING v. CORDELL Discussed at Length 1910 OK 118, 109 P. 563, 26 Okla. 366, BOARD OF EDUC. OF ARDMORE v. STATE ex rel.

Edwards v. Welch

29 Okla. 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 11, 1911

Gibson, from which he had been removed by the board of trustees of said town. It seems that Mr. … Under these circumstances Freeman v.

Gelabert v. State

104 Okla. 31 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1924

Brown v. Parks, 80 Okla. 184 , 195 Pac. 133 ; Voorhies v. Bissell, 80 Okla. 136 . 194 Pac. 896 ; Hall v. Bank of Commerce. 80 Okla. 40 . 193 Pac. 990 : Board of County Commissioners v. … Little. 80 Okla. 45 , 193 Pac. 986 ; Wheete v. City of Tulsa, 98 Okla. 4 . 223 Pac. 634 .

Potter v. Bond

98 Okla. 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1924

L. 28-217, and Richards v. State, 12 Okla. Cr. 224 , 154 Pac. 72 . … McNally v. Harley, 68 Okla. 115 , 172 Pac. 46 ; Bishop-Babcock-Baker Company v. Estes Drug Company, 63 Okla. 117 , 163 Pac. 276 ; Fender, Administrator, et al. v.

International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 2284 v. Public Employees Relations Board

358 P.3d 941 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 2015

See City of Tulsa v. State ex rel. Pub. Em *944 ployees Relations Bd., 1998 OK 92 , 1 12, 967 P.2d 1214 . … See Traders Compress Co. v. Bd. of Review, Okla. Employment Sec.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 22, 1997

In re Bankoff, 875 P.2d 1138 , 1141 (Okla. 1994); Blue Circle Cement v. Board of County Commissioners, 27 F.3d 1499 , 1513 (10th Cir. 1994); see also Harris v. … Hadacheck v.

Humphrey v. Coquillard Wagon Works

37 Okla. 714 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1913

Railway Company v. Rambolt, 67 Tex. 654 , 4 S. W. 356 ; Carroll v. Silk, 70 Tex. 23 , 11 S. W. 116 ; Betterton v. Echols, 85 Tex. 212 , 20 S. W. 63 ; Erwin v. Blanks, 60 Tex. 583 ; Carney v. Marsalis, 77 Tex. 62 , 13 S. … Co. v.

State Ex Rel. King v. McCurdy

171 Okla. 445 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1935

It is contended that this portion of the road was abandoned by the board of county commissioners, but the defendant failed to show any record or official action of the board. … Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 161 Okla. 300 , 18 P. (2d) 888 .

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005

Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982) (footnote omitted). … DREW EDMONDSON Attorney General of Oklahoma DOROTHY BROWN Assistant Attorney General 1 Id. § 6536(4). 2 Id. § 6536(6). 3 Id. § 6538(D)(6). 4 Id. § 6542(E)(6). 5 Id. § 6535(B)(6). 6 Your question is related to disclosure under

IMMEL v. TULSA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY

490 P.3d 135 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 2021

Brown v. … BROWN v. CITY OF WARR ACRES Discussed at Length 1926 OK 453 , 256 P. 56 , 126 Okla. 175 , DOW v. WORLEY Discussed at Length 1950 OK 95 , 217 P.2d 835 , 202 Okla. 628 , BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF TULSA COUNTY v.

Opinion No. 69-253 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1969

Title 57 O.S. 514 [ 57-514 ](d) (1968), made it the duty of the Division of Probation and Parole to "report to the Pardon and Parole Board, for recommendation to the Governor, violations of terms and conditions of paroles … Public Officers have only such authority as conferred upon them by law, and such authority must be exercised in the manner prescribed by law Brown v. State Election Board, Okl., 369 P.2d 140 .