Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.06s
65 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 10, 1961
In that original action, Nichols *47 v. Board of Education of Jersey City, 9 N. … (Emphasis supplied) *54 However, in the subsequent ease of Downs v. Board of Education of Dist. of Hohoken, 126 N. J. L. 11 (Sup. Ct. 1940), affirmed opinion below Schlank v. Board of Education, 127 N. J.
Cited 0 timesPublished91 N.J. 233 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 8, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublished118 N.J. 201 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1989
Cited 0 timesPublishedStines v. Board of Commissioners
11 N.J. Misc. 757 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 7, 1933
The writ brings up a resolution passed by the board of commissioners of the borough of Belmar suspending the prosecutor from the police department of the borough. … Fitchett v. Turner, 7 N. J. Mis. R. 1014; 147 Atl. Rep. 740 . The dismissal was not accomplished in accordance with the statute. The resolution will be set aside, with costs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHolloway v. Board of Commissioners
10 N.J. Misc. 704 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1932
In Turtur v. Turley, 103 N. J. L. 526; 138 Atl. Rep. 209 , the office of license inspector of Elizabeth was held to have been fixed by law and to be outside the provisions of the above act. … The power of a municipality to fix the term of an office “by law” by ordinance or appropriate action was upheld in McGrath v. Bayonne, 85 N. J. L. 188; 89 Atl. Rep. 48 . In Turtur v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Wyckoff Education Ass'n
81 N.J. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1979
Cited 9 timesPublished212 N.J. Super. 467 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 27, 1984
Claimant urges that we construe the statute to include psychologists as the court construed it to include chiropractors in Thomas v. … Co. v. Knuckles, 142 N.J.Super. 162, 166 (App.Div.1976). Nevertheless, they are two separate legislative acts, 2 and each has its own penalty provision.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKurowski v. Board of Adjustment of Bayonne
11 N.J. Super. 433 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1951
Cited 5 timesPublishedNiccollai v. Planning Board of Wayne
148 N.J. Super. 150 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 3, 1977
Super. 594 (Law Div. 1963); Nelson v. So. Brunswick Planning Bd., 84 N. J. Super. 265 (App. Div. 1964); Oakwood at Madison v. Madison Tp., 128 N. J. … N.A.A.C.P. v. Mt. Laurel Tp., supra, 67 N. J. at 166.
Cited 1 timesPublished113 N.J. 346 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1988
Cited 0 timesPublished202 N.J. Super. 469 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 1, 1985
Appeals from the deputy’s determination may be made to an appeal tribunal and ultimately to the board of review. … See Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, 13 N.J. 447, 454-455 (1953). A favorable determination of one of the essential factors that leaves the other undecided is not a determination of entitlement. Amico v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMitchell v. United Box Board & Paper Co.
72 N.J. Eq. 580 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · May 14, 1907
Wilkinson v. Bauerle, 41 N. J. Eq. (14 Stew.) 635, 643, &c. (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1886). In Stewart v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co., 38 N. J. … Lillard v. Oil, &c., Co., supra (Vice-Chancellor Emery, 1903).
Cited 7 timesPublished190 N.J. Super. 36 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 6, 1983
See de Laurier v. San Diego Unified School Dist., 588 F.2d 674, 680 (9 Cir.1978). … I would hold that for reasons of administrative efficiency and economy, local boards may utilize a presumption of disability for the four-week periods before and after delivery if they choose. See de Laurier v.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 N.J. Misc. 905 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 20, 1928
The building inspector having refused a permit, prosecutors took an appeal to the board of adjustment. … In Chancellor Development Co. v. Senior, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 633, followed in a number of later cases, it was said that the board of adjustment is to decide the question after hearing testimony.
Cited 0 timesPublished107 N.J. 123 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 10, 1987
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarrison v. Board of Adjustment
6 N.J. Misc. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 14, 1928
There is testimony in the case which supports the finding of the board. The board of adjustment acts in a judicial capacity in passing upon the merits of the appeal. … Scott, 133 Id. 767; Jersey Land Co. v. Scott, 135 Id. 462; Contras v. Jersey City, 135 Id. 472; Caldwell v. Saul, 135 Id. 691; Hench v. East Orange, 130 Id. 363; Chancellor Development Corporation v.
Cited 0 timesPublished159 N.J. Super. 40 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1978
The New Jersey Board of Review concluded that it had no authority to overrule the finding of the transferring state and therefore denied benefits. … Barr v. United States, 478 F. 2d 1152 (10 Cir. 1978); Klimko v. Virginia Employment Comm., 216 Va. 750 , 222 S. E. 2d 559 (Sup. Ct. App. 1976). Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Chosen Freeholders v. Kaiser
76 N.J.L. 829 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1908
The opinion cited the ease of Virtue v. Freeholders of Es sex, 38 Vroom 139 . We have not considered that case, and express no opinion thereon.
Cited 1 timesPublished87 N.J. 402 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublishedCraster v. Board of Commissioners
16 N.J. Super. 524 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 29, 1951
Judson v. Newark Board of Works Pension Asso ciation, 132 N. J. L. 106 (Sup. Ct. 1944), affirmed 133 N.J.L. 28 (E.& A. 1945). … Judson v. Newark Board of Works Pension As sociation 132 N. J. L. 106 (Sup. Ct. 1944), affirmed 133 N. J. L. 28 (E. & A. 1945).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna