Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

4.71s

  • Wilmoth v. Stokes County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 1, 1997

    Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Company , 233 N.C. 372 , 64 S.E.2d 265 (1951). 2. … Horne v. Universal Leaf Tobacco Processors , 119 N.C. App. 682 (1995). 3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    104 N.C. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 5, 1991

    Likewise, an appeal to the local board of educa- *430 tipn does not preclude an appeal to the superior court. See Warren v. Buncombe County Bd. of Educ., 80 N.C. … Murphy v. McIntyre, 69 N.C.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Abernethy v. Town of Boone Board of Adjustment

    109 N.C. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1993

    When a superior court reviews the decision of a board of adjustment on certiorari, the superior court sits as an appellate court. CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment, 105 N.C. App. 32 , 411 S.E.2d 655 (1992). … Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Comm’rs, 299 N.C. 620 , 265 S.E.2d 379 , reh’g denied, 300 N.C. 562 , 270 S.E.2d 106 (1980).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Waggoner v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic Control

    7 N.C. App. 692 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1970

    Brown testified that there was more than two hundred and fifty feet of visibility in either direction from The Lantern on U. … The functions of the Superior Court, which acts as a reviewing court in an administrative law action, are set out in Bailey v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Procter v. City of Raleigh Board of Adjustment

    140 N.C. App. 784 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 5, 2000

    In reviewing a decision of a board of adjustment with respect to the application of a zoning ordinance, the superior court is to apply a de novo standard of review. Ayers v. … Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 629 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 385 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Oxendine v. Lincoln County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 22, 1997

    Harless v. Flynn , 1 N.C. App. 448 , 162 S.E.2d 47 (1968); Smith v. Central Transportation , 51 N.C. App. 316 , 276 S.E.2d 751 (1981); Watkins v. City of Wilmington , 290 N.C. 276 , 225 S.E.2d 577 (1976). 3. … Massey v. Board of Education , 204 N.C. 193 , 167 S.E.2d 695 (1933); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2 (6). 5.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gore v. Guilford County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 24, 1995

    In the case of Vernon v. Steven L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown Clark v. Meads

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 28, 2022

    Order v. … Given that Brown Clark’s motion is a discovery motion, she is bound by the Local Rules governing them. Muhammad v. Fleming, -- F 4th --, 2022 WL 791419, at *4 n.6 (4th Cir.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fuller v. Vance County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 28, 1995

    In Green v. … In Slade v. New Hanover County Board of Education , 10 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Forsyth Municipal Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Folds

    117 N.C. App. 232 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 6, 1994

    See Wilson v. McClenny, 262 N.C. 121 , 136 S.E.2d 569 (1964); Tomberlin v. Long, 250 N.C. 640, 109 S.E.2d 365 (1959); Turner v. Turner, 242 N.C. 533 , 89 S.E.2d 245 (1955); Bank v. … Turner v. Turner, 242 N.C. 533, 538 , 89 S.E.2d 245, 249 (1955); McDonald v. Technical Institute, 46 N.C. App. 77, 81 , 264 S.E.2d 123, 126 (1980); Bank v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Boomer v. Beaufort County Board of Education

    294 F. Supp. 179 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 5, 1968

    It is therefore imperative that an order be entered directing that the defendants implement a plan consistent with the decisions of the Supreme Court in Green v. … County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 ; Monroe v. Board of Commissioners of City of Jackson, 391 U.S. 450 , 88 S.Ct. 1700 , 20 L.Ed.2d 733 ; Raney v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Tucker v. Surry County Board of Education

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 30, 1994

    Rutledge v. Tultex Corp ., 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983); Morrison v. Burlington Industries , 304 N.C. 1 , 282 S.E.2d 458 (1981); Gray v. Pilot Freight Lines , 105 N.C. App. 480 , 489 , 414 S.E.2d 102 (1992). … Pollard v. Krispy Waffle #1 , 63 N.C. App. 354 , 304 S.E.2d 762 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ponder v. North Carolina State Board of Elections

    233 N.C. 707 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 7, 1951

    Warren v. A. C. L. R. R., 223 N.C. 843 , 28 S.E. 2d 505 . The facts alleged are not sufficient to attract the attention of a court of equity or to invoke its jurisdiction. Greenville v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. State Highway Commission

    195 N.C. 26 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1928

    Newton v. Highway Commission, 192 N. C., 54 ; S. c., 194 N. C., 159 ; S. c., ibid., 303; Smith v. Highway Commission, ibid., 333. … In Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Board of Commissioners of Franklin County

    183 N.C. 231 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 29, 1922

    In Gastonia v. … As suggested in Hotel Co. v.

    Disapproved by Sidney Spitzer & Co. v. Commissioners of Franklin County, 188 N.C. 30 (1924)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Allred

    275 N.C. 554 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1969

    In Bank v. Oil Mills, 150 N.C. 683 , 64 S.E. 883 , and Peanut Growers Exchange v. … In accordance with our decisions in Oliphant v. R. R., supra, and in State v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Board of Commissioners

    74 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 15, 1876

    In Poindexter v. Davis, 67 N. C. Rep. 112 , cited.by the plaintiff, the liability of the county was not involved ; but the liability of the present plaintiff, who was then defendant as surety of the county. … But if the board borrows money, either to support the poor or to build a church, and gives its bond, with A B as surety, then the surety is liable whether the board is or not. Apply these principles to our case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Staunton Military Academy, Inc. v. Dockery

    244 N.C. 427 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 19, 1956

    Skinner v. Coward, 197 N.C. 466 , 149 S.E. 682 ; Barrett v. Barnes, 186 N.C. 154, 158 , 119 S.E. 194 ; Norman v. Hallsey, 132 N.C. 6 , 43 S.E. 473 . When adverse claims were asserted, defendant J. S. … Allgood v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Phipps v. New Hanover County Board of Education

    551 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 12, 1982

    . -, 102 S.Ct. 2452 , 73 L.Ed.2d 28 (1982), and Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. … E.g., Patsel v. District of Columbia Board of Education, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bunch v. North Carolina Code Officials Qualifications Board

    119 N.C. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1995

    See Air-A-Plane v. N.C. Dept. of E.H.N.R., 118 N.C. App. 118 , 454 S.E.2d 295 (1995) and cases cited therein. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E.2d 538, 541 (1977).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.