Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.75s
745 S.W.2d 238 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1987
Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 852-53 (Mo.App.1964). … Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d at 852 . While appellant relies on personal hardship to support his contention, the Board properly considered the impact on the land and surrounding properties.
Cited 22 timesPublishedInhabitants of Carondelet v. Dent
18 Mo. 284 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1853
This case, then, viewed as disconnected with the survey of Brown, is unlike both those of Chouteau v. Eckart, and Mackay v. Dillon, 2 and 4 Howard. In the ease of Chouteau v. Eckart, the claim of the village of St. … In the case of Mackay v. Dillon, in which the extent of the St. Louis commons was in question, there was a survey accompanying the claim, as laid before the board, and a definite number of acres claimed.
Cited 4 timesPublished22 Mo. 55 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1855
Tillier, in the case of Bissell v. Penrose, filed the claim in the office of the recorder ; prosecuted it before the board of commissioners. … The record showed the case was within the principle of Bissell v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedElrod v. Harrisonville Cass R-IX School District
706 S.W.2d 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1986
Williams v. Board of Education, Cass R-VIII School District, 573 S.W.2d 81, 85 [10] (Mo.App.1978). … Williams v. Board of Education, Cass R-VIII School District, 573 S.W.2d 81, 85 [7-10] (Mo.App.1978).
Cited 6 timesPublishedState ex rel. Church's Fried Chicken, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment
581 S.W.2d 861 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1979
The Board, in its findings of fact, did not include a finding that the testimony of Mr. Lynch was not credible. In Mo. Church of Scientology v. … Assn. v. Board of Adjustment, 425 S.W.2d 929 (Mo. banc 1968); Lichte v. Heidlage, 536 S.W.2d 898 (Mo.App.1976); Brown v. Board of Adjustment, 469 S.W.2d 844 (Mo.App.1971); 82 Am. Jur.2d Zoning, §§ 334-335. .
Cited 3 timesPublishedOrion Security, Inc. v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City
43 S.W.3d 467 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 2001
Greene County v. Hermel, Inc., 511 S.W.2d 762 (Mo.1974); Knapp v. Local Gov’t Employees Ret. Sys., 738 S.W.2d 903 (Mo.App.1987). … Madsen v. Madsen, 731 S.W.2d 324, 325 (Mo.App.1987). Thus, in Baker v.
Cited 6 timesPublished442 S.W.2d 128 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 1969
These statements correctly state the rule for review of decisions of zoning boards. State ex rel. Nigro v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 95 , 27 S.W.2d 1030 [5,6]; Brown v. Beuc, Mo.App., 384 S.W.2d 845 [1-3]. … Nigro v. Kansas City, supra, [1-4]; Brown v. Beuc, supra, [5, 6].
Cited 9 timesPublishedState ex rel. Niess v. Junkins
572 S.W.2d 468 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1978
In Moore v. … Herbert v. Downey, 572 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. banc 1978), decided concurrently.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState ex rel. Lindner v. Board of Police Commissioners
84 S.W.3d 522 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 2002
Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLetcher Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Hall
576 S.W.3d 123 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2019
He appealed to the Workers' Compensation Board (Board), which unanimously reversed the ALJ's determination. … Miller v. Tema Isenmann, Inc., 542 S.W.3d 265 , 271 (Ky. 2018). See also Childers v. Hackney's Creek Coal Co., 337 S.W.2d 680 , 683 (Ky. 1960).
Cited 14 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Teefey v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City
24 S.W.3d 681 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 27, 2000
Columbus Park Community Council v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 864 S.W.2d 437, 440 (Mo.App.1993). … City of Dellwood v. Twyford, 912 S.W.2d 58, 59 (Mo. banc 1995), citing Morrow v. City of Kansas City, 788 S.W.2d 278, 281 (Mo. banc 1990); Miller v. City of Manchester, 834 S.W.2d 904, 907 (Mo.App.1992).
Cited 47 timesPublishedBoard of Trade of City of Chicago v. McDearmott Commission Co.
143 F. 188 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Feb 2, 1906
The bill of complaint is essentially the same as those in the cases of Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Company, 198 U. S. 236 , 25 Sup. Ct. 637, 49 L. Ed. 1031 , and L. A. Kinsey Company v. Board of Trade, Id. … ; that such facts distinguish this case from those in Board of Trade v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTendai v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
77 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 2002
In conclusion, the court ordered, “This cause is reversed and remanded to the Board of Registration for the Healing Arts.” This Court examines its jurisdiction sua sponte. Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. … Crites v. Sho-Me Dragways, 719 S.W.2d 785, 786 (Mo. banc 1986). The circuit court’s partial reversal and remand to the Board leaves open a part of the case that, theoretically, could result in a ruling in Dr.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMoran v. Board of Directors, School District of Kansas City
584 S.W.2d 154 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1979
Vernon Schools etc. v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-782 (206) (banc 1976); Kansas City v. Rooney, 363 Mo. 902 , 254 S.W.2d 626, 628 (banc 1953); Aubuchon v. … The court was bound, however, by the findings made by the Board supported as demonstrated by the statement. Moore v. Bd. of Ed. of Sp. Sch. Dist., etc., supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTwentieth Judicial Circuit of State of Missouri v. Board of Commissioners
911 S.W.2d 626 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 19, 1995
Cannon v. Nikles, 235 Mo.App. 1094 , 151 S.W.2d 472, 475 (1941). Thus, the clerk is an agent of the circuit judge and possesses the statutory authority to perform certain tasks. … Chassaing v. Mummert, 887 S.W.2d 573, 576 (Mo. banc 1994).
Cited 9 timesPublished138 Mo. App. 557 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1909
Paul Brown, who had been a member of the board of the United Railways, resigned sometime in 1904, and his place was not filled. Judge Priest was a member of both boards until October 31, 1904; when he resigned. Mr. … See Martin v. Luktkewitte, 50 Mo. 58 ; McGindley v. Newton, 75 Mo. 115 ; Smith v. Sims, 77 Mo. 269 ; Clough v. Holden, 115 Mo. 336, 1 . c. 353; Nichols v. Stevens, 123 Mo. 96 ; Nagel v.
Cited 20 timesPublished318 S.W.3d 313 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 2010
We find two cases —Pettis v. State, 212 S.W.3d 189, 191-95 (Mo.App. W.D.2007), and Brown v. Gammon, 947 S.W.2d 437, 438 (Mo.App. W.D.1997) — aid our analysis in this case. … Brown, 947 S.W.2d at 441 . The Board of Probation and Parole evaluated the defendant’s performance in the program. Id. at 440 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedDerrickson v. Board of Ed. of City of St. Louis
537 F. Supp. 338 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 31, 1982
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Clark v. Mann, 562 F.2d 1104, 1115 (8th Cir. 1977); see Johnson v. … Meyr v. Board of Education of Affton School District, 572 F.2d 1229 (8th Cir. 1978).
Cited 6 timesPublished37 Mo. 556 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1866
In 1835 this lot was marked on Brown’s plat of surveys of block No: 46 of the city of St. … Stat. 440, § 4; West v. Cochran, 17 How., U. S. 403.
Cited 8 timesPublished147 Mo. App. 599 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1910
See Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 ; State Board of Agriculture v. The Citizen’s Street R. W. Co., 47 Ind. 407 . … See 2 Herman on Estoppel, sec. 1222; Motz v. Detroit, 18 Mich. 496 ; Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519 ; Moore v. The Mayor, etc., 73 N. Y. 238 .
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna