Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters2000

10,000+ results

1.24s

  • W. Va. Board of Education and L. Wade Linger, Jr. v. Jorea M. Marple

    236 W. Va. 654 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2015

    Marple has not identified a clearly established right that was violated by the discretionary actions of the Board or Mr. Linger, her suit is precluded by qualified immunity. A. … the constitutional standards clearly established at the time[?]”

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Baldridge v. Cordes

    350 Ark. 114 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 26, 2002

    Qualified Immunity A motion for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity is precluded only when the plaintiff has asserted a constitutional violation, demonstrated the constitutional right is clearly established and … Thus, an official is immune from suit if his actions did not violate clearly established principles of law of which a reasonable person would have knowledge. Virden v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • John Ronald Bertram v. George Deukmejian

    9 F.3d 1550 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 4, 1993

    for qualified immunity purposes. … Scherer, 468 U.S. 183, 193-94 (1984) (state official retains qualified immunity if the federal constitutional right was not clearly established, even if the conduct clearly violated state statute or regulation). 5 In Turner

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Woods v. Adamski

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 24, 2020

    Qualified immunity “protects government officials from liability for civil damages if their actions did not violate ‘clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.’ … immunity”); Clash, 77 F.3d at 1048 (denying summary judgment on qualified immunity claim because the Court lacked the “given facts” that either do or do not show a violation of “clearly established law”); Pabon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • People of Michigan v. Robert Tuttle

    498 Mich. 192 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2015

    not be set aside unless clearly erroneous. … required to establish immunity.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Rekeweg

    District Court, N.D. Indiana · Dec 2, 2020

    Defendants further contend that Deputy Mendoza is entitled to qualified immunity because he did not violate Burn’s clearly-established rights. … Therefore, Mendoza is entitled to summary judgment based upon the clearly-established prong of the qualified immunity analysis.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dorothy King v. Virginia Betts

    354 S.W.3d 691 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2011

    medications violated a clearly established right. … an otherwise clearly established law). .

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Suri

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 14, 2026

    When it comes to qualified immunity, “[a] prison official is immune from suit if the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established at the time of the violation, and thus a reasonable officer would not have known … The right to be protected from inmate-on-inmate violence was clearly established at the time of the complained-of events and has been clearly established for decades. See, e.g., Mayoral v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gallegos v. Freeman

    172 Wash. App. 616 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 7, 2013

    Accordingly, because the particularized right at issue was not “clearly established,” the trial court correctly ruled that the police officer was entitled to qualified immunity against this claim. … In evaluating a claim of qualified immunity, we must bear in mind that *629 courts “undermine the values qualified immunity seeks to promote . .. when what is not clearly established is held to be so.” al-Kidd, 131 S.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pagan v. Fruchey

    492 F.3d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 29, 2007

    A judicial pronouncement that an ordinance is consistent with common sense hardly establishes that it is so. B. … The district court, in its order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, determined that Chief Fruchey was entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Victoria Cunningham v. Dep't of Children's Servs.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 2021

    The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person … To defeat the qualified immunity defense, the plaintiff is required to plead facts demonstrating a violation of a constitutional right that is clearly established in a “particularized sense.” Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Weeks v. Barkman

    District Court, D. Colorado · Sep 13, 2021

    Oba is entitled to qualified immunity because he did not violate clearly established law.4 See Medina v. … to show law was clearly established); cf.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McMillan v. City of New York

    711 F.3d 120 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 4, 2013

    To accomplish this goal, the ADA requires that 13 employers provide reasonable accommodations to qualified 14 individuals. See id. § 12112(b)(5). … This burden is not heavy: “It is enough for the plaintiff 21 to suggest the existence of a plausible accommodation, the costs of 22 which, facially, do not clearly exceed its benefits.”

    Cited 334 timesPublished
  • Harold E. Sonnleitner v. Stanley York, Joann O'connor, Kathleen Bellaire, Kathy Karkula and Joe Leann

    304 F.3d 704 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 12, 2002

    However, under the second prong of the qualified immunity analysis, Sonnleitner has failed to establish that this right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation. … The individual defendants are entitled to qualified immunity because Sonn-leitner has failed to carry his burden of establishing the existence of a clearly established constitutional right to a pre-de-motion hearing as to

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Cassidy Jared Loch v. City of Litchfield

    689 F.3d 961 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 27, 2012

    Qualified immunity shields a government official from liability and the burdens of litigation unless his conduct violates “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known … An official is entitled to qualified immunity unless (1) the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, establishes a violation of a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) the right was clearly established

    Cited 104 timesPublished
  • Pensacola Christian College v. Bruhn

    80 So. 3d 1046 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 30, 2011

    Toyota Distribs., LLC., 60 So.3d 1155, 1157-58 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“A special employer qualifies as such where ‘(1) there was a contract for hire, either express or implied, between the special employer and the employee; … Hecht Invs., Ltd., 924 So.2d 944, 945-46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (holding that W-2 tax forms alone did not establish an employment relationship). Rather, as this court stated in Hoar Construction v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mattson v. Streibel

    District Court, D. Idaho · Dec 20, 2023

    violated clearly established law at the time of the incident. … Qualified immunity shields government officials from liability unless a plaintiff proves: “(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jason Moorhead v. West Virginia Army National Guard and West Virginia Mountaineer Challenge Academy

    West Virginia Supreme Court · May 2, 2025

    Clearly Established Rights or Laws Petitioner alleges that three different clearly established laws or rights were violated by the cadre that should strip Respondents of qualified immunity: (1) MCA’s safety … established rights or laws, we find none that strip Respondents of qualified immunity on these facts.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nina Yoder v. University of Louisville

    526 F. App'x 537 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 15, 2013

    The qualified-immunity doctrine shields government officials performing discretionary functions from civil liability unless their conduct violates clearly established rights. Barker v. … clearly established.

    Cited 32 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.