Case law

Opinion No. 80-047 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1980

See Adolph Coors Co. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Okl. 584 P.2d 717 (1978), Semke v. State ex rel. … See Lamb v. Brown, Okl. 456 P.2d 18 (1972) and State v. Dist. Ct. of Mayes County, Okl. 440 P.2d 700 (1968).

Watts v. Bd. of Commissioners Cleveland Co.

21 Okla. 231 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1908

See Independent District of Boyer v. King, 80 Iowa, 497 , 45 N. W. 908 ; Bunton v. King, 80 Iowa, 506 , 45 N. W. 1050 ; Myers v. Board of Education of Clay Center, 51 Kan. 87 , 32 Pac. 658 , 37 Am. St. Rep. 263 .” … (First National Bank v. Bunting & Co., 7 Idaho, 27 , 59 Pac. 929, 1106 ; Green v. Custer County, 8 Idaho, 721 , 71 Pac. 115 ; Myers v. Board of Education, 51 Kan. 87 , 32 Pac. 658 , 37 Am. St. Rep. 263 .)

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1956

OPINION — AG — ** CONTRACT — TEACHER — ENSUING YEAR ** (1) THE PRIMARY RULE OF A STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION THAT REPEALS BY IMPLICATION ARE NOT FAVORED (BROWN V. … BOARD OF EDUCATION, 126 P.2d 241 ), THE AG IS OF THE OPINION THE THE PROVISIONS OF 70 O.S. 8 -6 [70-8-6] WERE NOT REPEALED BY IMPLICATION OF SAID CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. (2) SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 51 IS LIABLE TO THE TEACHER

Berger v. City of Vinita

170 Okla. 214 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1934

Adair County Com'rs v. … In Board of Com'rs of Grant County v. Soucek, 128 Okla. 151 , 261 P. 947 , this court holds: "Under section 5727, C. O.

Application of Volunteers of America

749 P.2d 549 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 2, 1988

In cases involving special exceptions as well as variances, a presumption of correctness exists in favor of the Board’s rulings. See, e.g., Vinson v. Medley, Okl., 737 P.2d 932 (1987); Bailey v. … Brown v. Fraser, Okl., 467 P.2d 464, 467 (1970); Twist v. Kay, Okl., 434 P.2d 180, 184 (1967); Application of Shadid, 205 Okl. 462 , 238 P.2d 794, 797 (1951); Thompson v.

Cust-O-Fab v. Bohon

65 O.B.A.J. 2171 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1994

Boveri v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Burkett, 755 P.2d 650, 651 (Okl.1988); Beall v. Altus Public School District, 632 P.2d 400, 401 (Okl.1981).

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. McCurtain County, Oklahoma, Excise Board

352 P.2d 896 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1960

In support of the contention first above referred to, protestant cites Kiowa County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Company, Okl., 301 P.2d 677 , and Osage County Excise Board v. … error complained of by protestant could have been cured by a supplemental appropriation made pursuant to 68 O.S.19S1 § 292, as construed in Excise Board of Oklahoma County et al. v.

Kennedy v. State

640 P.2d 971 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1982

He is a diplómate of the American Board of Oral Pathology. Dr. … As Brown was walking toward his own room, he saw the man and girl enter Room 207, which was almost directly across from Brown’s room.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 17, 2009

This issue was addressed in Luker v. Board of County Commissioners , 84 P.3d 773 (Okla.Civ.App. 2002). … Id.; see also Lutes v.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Forrester

72 Okla. 8 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 19, 1918

Judge Brown, sitting in chambers at Stigler. Okla.. signed an order purporting to revive said action in the name of the administrator. … Powell et al. v. Nichols et al., 26 Okla. 734 , 110 Pac. 762 , 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 886; Boardman Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Atoka County, 70 Okla. 245 , 174 Pac. 272 .

Frayer v. Crain

196 Okla. 172 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1945

Fooshee and Brunson v. Smith, 34 Okla. 247 , 124 P. 1070 . A judgment is a judicial determination either that no cause of action existed or that no defense existed. Cressler v. Brown, 79 Okla. 170 , 192 P. 417 . … J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, and WELCH, JJ„ concur.

Pruitt v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, Board of Review

918 P.2d 80 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1996

It is well settled that judicial review of a decision of the Board of Review is a “special proceeding,” not a civil action. Edmondson v. Siegfried Ins. Agency, Inc., 577 P.2d 72 (Okla.1978). … General provisions of civil procedure do not apply to the special proceeding for district court review of decisions by the Board of Review. See District Ct. for Seventeenth Jud. Dist. v.

State v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF IND. SCH. DIST. NO. ONE

339 P.2d 534 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 5, 1959

In the first paragraph of the syllabus to Board of Education of City of Ardmore v. State ex rel. … Friend v.

Avery v. Goodrich

138 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1929

In support of this contention, plaintiff relies upon the following cases: Thorn v. Browne, 257 Fed. 519 ; Gettys v. Newburger, 272 Fed. 209 ; Clews v. Jameson, 182 U. S. 461 , 45 L. Ed. 1183 ; Wilhite v. … Houston, 200 Fed. 390 ; Board of Trade v. Christie Gr. Co., 198 U. S. 249 , 49 L. Ed. 1031 , and several other eases from the United States District Court, Circuit Court of appeals, and Supreme Court.

Fitzgerald v. Bass

122 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 4, 1927

In the case of Forrester v. Boston & M. … In the case of Colley v.

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Huston

27 Okla. 606 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1910

Rep. 547 ; State v. Ansel, 76 S. C. 395, 11 Am. & Eng. Ann. Cas. 613; Jonesboro, F. B. & B. Gap Turnp. Co. v. Brown, 8 Baxt. 490 , 35 Am. Rep. 713 ; State ex rel. Stewart v. Marks, 6 Lea. 12 ; Bates v. … In the Board of Education of the Territory of Oklahoma et al. v. Territory of Oklahoma ex rel.

Oklahoma Union Railway Co. v. Hainey

96 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1923

It was alleged *218 the ear was running at approximately 25 miles per hour, and plaintiff was standing at the station of Parenthia for the purpose of boarding a car, and the motorman operating the car waived his hand for … Co. v. Richards, 23 Okla. 256 , 102 Pac. 99 .

Earls Ex Rel. Earls v. Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District

115 F. Supp. 2d 1281 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 9, 2000

Miller v. … Chandler v.

Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines v. Meister

330 P.2d 579 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1958

Brown v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. … In Williams v.

Spiro State Bank v. First Poteau Corporation

70 O.B.A.J. 471 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 1, 1999

Supp.1993 § 990.4, Wilks v. Wilks, 1981 OK 91 , 632 P.2d 759, 763 , Brown v. … Let the writ issue directing the Board and the Commissioner to withdraw the January 27 Certifícate of Authority within 5 days of this order’s date. Rule 1.193 of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules.