Case law

Faymore v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

771 S.W.2d 357 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1989

Appeal from judgment of the trial court sustaining motion to dismiss appellant’s petition for review of an order of the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts revoking appellant’s medical license. Affirmed.

Yount v. Bd. of Educ. for City of St. Louis

712 S.W.2d 455 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1986

In Jones v. … Brown v. Greene County, Mo., 677 S.W.2d 432 (Mo.App.1984); Sanchez v. Missouri Div. of Youth Services, 672 S.W.2d 164 (Mo.App.1984); Ozark Silver Exchange, Inc. v. City of Rolla, 664 S.W.2d 50 (Mo.App.1984); Twente v.

Jones v. Members of the Board of Police Commissioners

435 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 28, 1977

E. g., Jennings v. Davis, 476 F.2d 1271, 1274-1275 (8th Cir. 1973). … Moor v. Alameda County, 411 U.S. 693, 710 , 93 S.Ct. 1785 , 36 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973). For these reasons the motion of the defendants for summary judgment will be granted.

Long v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis

331 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 25, 1971

331 F.Supp. 193 (1971) Ruby LONG and Jane Hanneken, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS et al., Defendants. No. 69 C 443(2). United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D. June 25, 1971. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 ; Williams v. School District of Springfield R-12, Mo., 447 S.W.2d 256 ; Freeman v.

Wright v. Caspari

779 F. Supp. 1025 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 2, 1992

Brown v. Frey, at 167. … The refusal of the Adjustment Board to call the plaintiff’s witnesses under such circumstances cannot be said to have violated his due process rights. Brown v. Frey, at 168; Graham v.

Woods v. State

371 S.W.3d 928 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 2012

Mertens v. Brown, 198 S.W.3d 616 (Mo. banc 2006), and State ex rel. Dorsey v. … of an abuse of discretion by the board of probation and parole.

Antioch Cmty. Church v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Kan. City

543 S.W.3d 28 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 3, 2018

To the extent Highlands Homes Association v. Board of Adjustment, 306 S.W.3d 561 , 565 (Mo. App. 2009), State ex rel. Branum v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of City of Kansas City, Mo., 85 S.W.3d 35 , 39 n.1 (Mo. … The courts may not substitute their discretion for that of the board. State ex rel. Nigro v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 95 , 27 S.W.2d 1030 , 1033 (Mo. banc 1930) ; Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845 , 850 (Mo. App. 1964).

Lash v. Parlin

78 Mo. 391 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

Rollins v. Claybrook, 22 Mo. 407; Moss v. Green, 41 Mo. 389; Briggs v. Munchon, 56 Mo. 467 ; 1 Greenleaf Ev., § 284 a. The memorandum offered in evidence was as follows: ‘ Brookfield, September 10th, 1874. … Browne in the fourth edition of his work, section 372, says: “ It is necessary that the memorandum should show who are the parties to the contract by some reference sufficient to identify themand he cites Champion v.

Bell v. Bd. of Educ. of City of St. Louis

711 S.W.2d 950 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1986

School boards are granted broad powers and discretion in the management of school affairs. § 162.621, RSMo 1978; Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 139 (Mo.App.1984). … Brown, 675 S.W.2d at 139 .

Stovall v. City of St. Louis Board of Education

469 F. Supp. 551 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 4, 1979

Farris v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 576 F.2d 765 (8th Cir. 1978). … United Air Lines, Inc. v. Evans, 431 U.S. 553 , 97 S.Ct. 1885 , 52 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977). Plaintiff has shown no present violation of Title VII by the Board.

Elrod v. Harrisonville Cass R-IX School District

706 S.W.2d 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 1986

Williams v. Board of Education, Cass R-VIII School District, 573 S.W.2d 81, 85 [10] (Mo.App.1978). … Williams v. Board of Education, Cass R-VIII School District, 573 S.W.2d 81, 85 [7-10] (Mo.App.1978).

Stribling v. Jolley

362 Mo. 995 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1952

Soc. v. Schoen, Mo. Sup., 93 S. W. 2d 669 ; State ex rel. Equality Sav. & Bldg., Assn. v. Brown, 334 Mo. 781 , 68 S. W. 2d 55 , and cases cited; Kingshighway Presbyterian Church v. Sun Realty Co., 324 Mo. 510 , 24 S. … Bankers’ Mortgage Co. v. Lessley, 31 S. W. 2d 1055 , 1. c. 1058. In ruling that case we quoted with approval the following from Brown v. MK&T Ry. Co., 175 Mo. 185, 188 , 74 S.

St. Louis Police Leadership Organization v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners

465 S.W.3d 501 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2015

Assoc. v. … See Mullane v.

State ex rel. Howard v. Estate of Timbrook

240 Mo. 226 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 1912

Judge Cooley states the rule by quoting from the opinion of the Supreme Court of Maine in Brown v. … The case of Burke v. Brown, 148 Mo. 309 , was decided under the Law of 1872, and for that reason does not contravene what is here said.

State ex rel. Linn County v. Adams

172 Mo. 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 18, 1903

[Jackson County v. Stone, 168 Mo. 577 ; State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 153 Mo. 194 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 146 Mo. 401 ; State ex rel. v. Wofford, 116 Mo. 220 ; Givens v. Daviess Co., 107 Mo. 603 ; Gammon v. … McGrath v. Walker, 97 Mo. 162 , to which we are cited. In that case there was a statute expressly providing a per diem compensation for the members of the state board of equalization (R.

Tendai v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

77 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 11, 2002

In conclusion, the court ordered, “This cause is reversed and remanded to the Board of Registration for the Healing Arts.” This Court examines its jurisdiction sua sponte. Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. … Crites v. Sho-Me Dragways, 719 S.W.2d 785, 786 (Mo. banc 1986). The circuit court’s partial reversal and remand to the Board leaves open a part of the case that, theoretically, could result in a ruling in Dr.

State ex rel. Brison v. Lingo

26 Mo. 496 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1858

.; Commonwealth v. Brown, 1 Serg. & Raw. 385; Commercial Bank of Rodney v. State, 4 Smedes & M. 490 ; 2 Kydd on Corp. 439; State Bank v. State, 1 Blackf. 272 ; Commonwealth v. Brickett, 2 Va. cases, 51; Rex v. … The city council is composed of two boards — the board of aldermen and the board of delegates ; and though, as to the officers appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the board of aldermen, the right of removing such resides

Smith v. Sheriff

982 S.W.2d 775 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1998

Librach, 778 S.W.2d at 355 ; Brown v. Weir, 675 S.W.2d 135, 140 (Mo.App. E.D. 1984). … Brown, 675 S.W.2d at 140 . In Wilson v. McNeal, 575 S.W.2d 802 (Mo.

Ogawa v. City of Des Peres

745 S.W.2d 238 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1987

Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 852-53 (Mo.App.1964). … Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d at 852 . While appellant relies on personal hardship to support his contention, the Board properly considered the impact on the land and surrounding properties.

State ex rel. Niess v. Junkins

572 S.W.2d 468 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 6, 1978

In Moore v. … Herbert v. Downey, 572 S.W.2d 473 (Mo. banc 1978), decided concurrently.