Case law

Austin Conner v. Alabama State Board of Pharmacy.

80 So. 3d 959 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 16, 2011

Medical Licensure Comm’n of Alabama v. Herrera, 918 So.2d 918, 926 (Ala.Civ.App.2005); State Dep’t of Human Res. v. Funk, 651 So.2d 12, 16 (Ala.Civ.App.1994). … In support of its contention, the Board cites Marcus v. Ambach, 136 A.D.2d 778 , 523 N.Y.S.2d 241 (1988), the facts of which are more closely on point with those in the instant case.

Turner v. Alabama State Tenure Commission

523 So. 2d 403 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 8, 1988

decision in Brown v. … In that case, it was undisputed “that the exact [notice] provisions of [§ 16-24-9] were not followed by the Board of Education” in cancelling Mr. Brown’s contract. 349 So.2d at 57 .

Brown v. Bell

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 14, 2022

P. 12(b)(6), the Court accepts Brown’s well-pleaded factual allegations as true, Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984), and construes the operative complaint in Brown’s favor, Duke v. … McDowell v. Brown, 392 F.3d 1283, 1290 (11th Cir. 2004).

Hughes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

223 Ala. 59 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 30, 1931

Hollings v. Brown, 202 Ala. 504 , 80 So. 792 ; Goodman v. Georgia Life Ins. Co., 189 Ala. 130 , 66 So. 649 ; Globe Ind. Co. v. Martin, 214 Ala. 646 , 108 So. 761 ; 59 A. L. R. 1125, 1126, note. … J., and BROWN and FOSTER, JJ., concur. 1 222 Ala. 70 . 2 222 Ala. 216 .

Barber Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control Board

274 Ala. 563 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 28, 1963

Ex parte Burch, 236 Ala. 662 , 184 So. 694 ; Ex parte Brown, 58 Ala. 536 ; Ex parte Roundtree, 51 Ala. 42 . The issuance of the writ lies within the sound discretion of the court and is not a writ of right. Dear v. … Howle v. Ala. State Milk Control Board, 265 Ala. 189 , 90 So.2d 752 .

Brown v. Peters

District Court, N.D. Alabama · Nov 2, 2021

To make such a showing, a “petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” Slack v. … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003) (internal quotations omitted). Based on the foregoing, Brown has failed to make the requisite showing.

Board of Commissioners of the City of Montgomery v. Crenshaw

270 Ala. 598 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1960

Such is the effect of our holdings in the following cases: Bozeman v. State, 269 Ala. 610 , 114 So.2d 914 ; Adkins v. State, 268 Ala. 548 , 109 So.2d 749 ; Golden v. State, 267 Ala. 456 , 103 So.2d 62 ; Gambrell v. … Bridges, 266 Ala. 302 , 96 So.2d 182 ; Bruner v. State, 265 Ala. 357 , 91 So.2d 224 . See, also, Thorpe v. State, Ala., 119 So.2d 222 . 1 Cf. Tipton v.

Marshall County Board of Education v. State Ex Rel. Williams

252 Ala. 547 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 18, 1949

Board of Education of Jefferson County et al. v. State ex rel. Kuchins et al., 222 Ala. 70 , 131 So. 239 . … BROWN, LIVINGSTON, SIMPSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Mobile County Personnel Board v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer Systems

138 So. 3d 1011 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 12, 2013

The Mobile Board appeared in the appeal, and MAWSS moved to dismiss the Mobile Board as a party on the ground that, under this court’s holding in City of Dothan Personnel Board v. … The [Dothan] Board did not have a ‘cognizable interest in the outcome of [DeVane’s termination] proceeding.’ Board of County Comm’rs of Washington County, Maryland v. H.

In Re Opinions of the Justices

220 Ala. 539 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 14, 1930

Brown and Arthur B. … BROWN, A. B. FOSTER, Associate Justices.

Brown v. Stokes

District Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 17, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION EBONY AKIA BROWN, … Stillwell v. Allstate Ins. Co., 663 F.3d 1329, 1332 (quoting Crowe v. Coleman, 113 F.3d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir. 1997)).

Brown v. Saul

District Court, S.D. Alabama · Nov 1, 2021

See Kelley v. … V.

Brown v. Kijakazi

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 7, 2022

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION   LILLIE ANN BROWN … Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). See also Reeves v.

Brooks v. County Board of Education of Marion County

242 Ala. 696 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 28, 1941

Wright v. Cook

216 Ala. 270 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1927

BROWN, J. … McMurray, 210 Ala. 639 , 98 So. 782 ; McMurray v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, ante, p. 144, 112 So. 644 .

Brown v. Dunn

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 4, 2021

v. ) 2:21cv440-MHT ) (WO) JEFFERSON S. … Brown, as the administrator of the estate of decedent Larry Brown, brought claims against defendants Jefferson Dunn, Patricia Jones, and David Lamar under 42

Water Works Board of Birmingham v. Alabama Surface Mining Commission

177 So. 3d 1167 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 19, 2014

Ex parte Neely, 653 So.2d 945, 947 (Ala.1995); Alabama Youth Services Board v. Ellis, 350 So.2d 405, 407 (Ala. 1977). … See also Tuscaloosa County Comm’n v.

Paradiso v. Board of Com'rs of Alabama State Bar

284 Ala. 450 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 10, 1969

This is a petition for review of the decision of the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar. … Assignments 5 and 6 *453 charge that the Board erred'in considering the depositions of Hutch and Annie Shinn. These are the argued assignments.

Harris v. Board of Water and Sewer Com'rs of City of Mobile

294 Ala. 606 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 2, 1975

Anderson v. Howard Hall Company, supra; Brown v. Fogarty, 221 Ala. 283 , 128 So. 376 (1930). The third party beneficiary rule has also been the basis of recovery under similar factual situations in other jurisdictions. … Shannon v. City of Grand Coulee, 7 Wash.App. 919, 503 P.2d 760 (1972) ; Royal Indemnity Co. v. City of Erie, supra; Potter v. Carolina Water Co., supra. Moreover, our decision is but a natural extension of Brown v.

United States v. Hale County Board of Education

426 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Jan 3, 1977

The school board is directed that the contemplated report is to be filed *279 with this Court within sixty days of this Order. … prior Orders in a manner as provided in the case of United States v.