Case law

Duckett v. Oklahoma ex rel. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma

986 F. Supp. 2d 1249 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 14, 2013

See Morris v. City of Colorado Springs, 666 F.3d 654, 661 (10th Cir.2012); see also Couch v. Board of Trustees, 587 F.3d 1223, 1235 (10th Cir.2009). … v.

Opinion No. 67-331

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1967

OPINION — AG — THE ATTORNEY GENERAL APPLIES THAT FAMILIAR RULE THAT PUBLIC OFFICERS HAVE ONLY SUCH AUTHORITY AS IS CONFERRED UPON THEM BY LAW, AND SUCH AUTHORITY MUST BE EXERCISE IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED BY LAW, BROWN V. … STATE ELECTION BOARD, OKL. 369 P.2d 140 , AND IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ADVISES YOU THAT THERE IS NO STATUTE THAT GIVES YOU A DUTY OR AUTHORITY TO COMMENCE AN ACTION TO TERMINATE A PARENT'S PARENTAL RIGHTS TO HIS CHILD.

RE: Reinstatement of Certificates of Certified Shorthand Reporters

2025 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 28, 2025

RE: Reinstatement of Certificates of Certified Shorthand Reporters ORDER The Oklahoma Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters recommended to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma that the certificate of each of the Oklahoma … to 20 O.S., Chapter 20, App. l, Rules 20 and 23, the certificates of the following shorthand reporters are reinstated from the suspension earlier imposed by this Court: Name CSR # Effective Date of Reinstatement Dennis Brown

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1967

OPINION — AG — THE ATTORNEY GENERAL APPLIES THAT FAMILIAR RULE THAT PUBLIC OFFICERS HAVE ONLY SUCH AUTHORITY AS IS CONFERRED UPON THEM BY LAW, AND SUCH AUTHORITY MUST BE EXERCISE IN THE MANNER PRESCRIBED BY LAW, BROWN V. … STATE ELECTION BOARD, OKL. 369 P.2d 140 , AND IN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ADVISES YOU THAT THERE IS NO STATUTE THAT GIVES YOU A DUTY OR AUTHORITY TO COMMENCE AN ACTION TO TERMINATE A PARENT'S PARENTAL RIGHTS TO HIS CHILD.

Hausam v. Parker

31 Okla. 399 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

Brown, of the election board, swore that none of them were torn in the manner in which this was torn; that it could not be so torn by the weight of the ballots; that those that did have openings were split along the folds … Montgomery v.

RITTER v. STATE

520 P.3d 370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2022

Fent v. Contingency Review Board , 2007 OK 27 Ranola Oil Co . v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma , 1988 OK 28 752 P.2d 1116 Collier v. Rees e, 2009 OK 86 Brown ex rel . Brown v. … Dept . of Transp . v. Pile , 1979 OK 152 603 P.2d 337 Mustang Run Wild Project , LLC . v. Osage County Board of Adjustment , 2016 OK 113 387 P.3d 333 Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co . V.

Opinion No. 77-243 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 1977

Hedges v. Groom, 151 P.2d 936 (okl. 1944). … Cuzalina, 520 P.2d 656 (Okl. 1974); Wade v. Brown, 516 P.2d 526 (Okl. 1973). The earlier statute will not be repealed by a latter statute unless there is irreconcilable conflict. Gulf Oil Co. v.

City of Ardmore v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.

172 Okla. 373 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935

Co. v. … Davis, Kelly Brown, and Julian B. Fite in the preparation of this opinion.

Charles W Brown and Patty N Brown LLC v. Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2023

Brown, LLC has responded in opposition (Doc. No. 43), and Defendant has replied (Doc. No. 45). … Khalik v. United Air Lines, 671 F.3d 1188, 1190 (10th Cir. 2012) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

Williams v. State

648 P.2d 843 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 15, 1982

She also stated that the suspect was wearing sunglasses, a brown hat and a brown leather coat. The only apparent discrepancy was that Williams actually had a beard. … Further, in Brown v. State, 384 P.2d 54 (Okl.Cr.1963), we stated that the ultimate test of admissibility of confessions is a test of voluntariness.

Morgan v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety

65 O.B.A.J. 3364 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1993

Lone Star Helicopters, Inc. v. … In Browning v. State ex rel. DPS, 812 P.2d 1372 (Okl.App.1991), the relevant rules and regulations were not produced at trial. .

Protest of Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Excise Board of Pontotoc County

164 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1933

Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Odom

172 Okla. 411 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1935

Allen v. Chamberlain, 134 Tenn. 438 , 183 S. W. 1034 ; Grant v. Nihill, 64 Mont. 420 , 210 P. 914 ; Yates v. McCullough Iron Co., 69 Md. 370 , 16 Atl. 280 ; Donnelly v. … In the case of Soltz v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Creek County Rural Water District No. 2

66 O.B.A.J. 111 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 29, 1994

The appeal concerns questions of statutory construction of dueling legislation and a 20 year old resolution of the Creek County Board of County Commissioners. … Eason Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission, 535 P.2d 283 (Okla.1975). Consistent with our rules of statutory construction, we will not dissect each of the above enactments to determine its isolated intent.

United States v. Board of Com'rs of McIntosh County

62 F. Supp. 671 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1945

Board of Commissioners v. … Board of Commissioners v. Seber, supra; Osage County v. United States, 10 Cir., 145 F.2d 1022 .

Ticer v. State Ex Rel. Holt

35 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1912

Ripey & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okla. 600 , 112 Pac. 1119 ; State ex rel. West et al. v. McCafferty, County Treasurer, 25 Okla. 2 , 105 Pac. 992 ; Smock v. … Farmers’ Union State Bank, 22 Okla. 825 , 98 Pac. 945 ; Fritz v. Brown, 20 Okla. 263 , 95 Pac. 437 .

City of Oklahoma City v. Public Employees Relations Board of the State

68 O.B.A.J. 2358 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 4, 1997

Dicks v. Clarence L. Boyd Co., 205 Okla. 383 , 238 P.2d 315, 317 (1951). … Tulsa Area Hospital Council v. Oral Roberts University, 626 P.2d 316 (Okla.1981). Our review of administrative rulings does not include weighing the evidence on appeal. See, Samson Resources Co. v.

Sheffield Steel Corp. v. HMK Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Sheffield Steel Corp.)

320 B.R. 423 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 8, 2004

The Board could not have relied upon the BT Alex. Brown speculative “preliminary *452 valuation” to justify the payment of the $10 million dividend because it was not issued until after the dividend was paid. … Brown’s opinion.

Robinson v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

932 P.2d 1120 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 28, 1997

v. … See Jones v. Brown, 516 P.2d 546, 548 (Okla.1973) (venue statutes are liberally construed so as to prevent a party from being deprived of the right to have suit filed in a particular county).

Hardin v. Dale

45 Okla. 694 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

In Forbes v. … In Gay v.