Case law

Miller v. Browning-Ferris Industries

674 S.W.2d 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 29, 1984

On May 17, 1982, respondents Browning-Ferris Industries of Kansas City, Inc. (hereinafter Browning-Ferris), Frank Douglas, and Riverview Land Association, Inc. … Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Bank of St. Ann, 631 S.W.2d 73 (Mo.App.1982), State ex rel. Steak n Shake, Inc. v. City of Richmond Heights, 560 S.W.2d 373 (Mo.App.1977), and Williams v.

Durley v. BOARD OF POLICE COM'RS, CITY OF ST. LOUIS

238 S.W.3d 685 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2007

Dhyne v. State Farm, Fire & Cas. … an official policy or a custom of the municipality. 5 Williams, 841 S.W.2d at 196 (applying municipal liability analysis to Board of Police Commissioners); Ware v.

Gilroy-Sims & Associates v. City of St. Louis

697 S.W.2d 567 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1985

Grogan v. Hays, 639 S.W.2d 875, 877 (Mo.App.1982). … Brown v. Morris, 365 Mo. 946 , 290 S.W.2d 160 (Mo.banc 1956); 42 Am.Jur.2d Initiative and Referendum § 55 (1969).

BT Residential, LLC v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

392 S.W.3d 18 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 2012

Reiz v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 316 S.W.3d 331, 334 (Mo.App. W.D.2010). … Bird v.

Gould v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

826 S.W.2d 101 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1992

In Count IV, plaintiff sought money damages from a second defendant, an investigator employed by the State Board. The State Board withdrew the subpoena and filed a motion to dismiss all counts against the State Board. … Wilson, 791 S.W.2d at 500 ; Bay’s Texaco Service and Supply Company, Inc. v. Mayfield, 792 S.W.2d 50, 51 (Mo.App.1990); Rule 74.01(b).

Robinson v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Board of Probation & Parole

805 S.W.2d 688 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1991

In Thummel v. … Claimant relies on Ross v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 738 S.W.2d 611 (Mo.App.1987).

Bank of Jacomo v. Fox

82 S.W.3d 224 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 2002

Claudia Lee & Associates v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Zoning Adjustment

489 S.W.3d 802 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2016

State at Relation of Noland Road Raceways, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 145 S.W.3d 455, 456 (Mo. … In Bucker v.

Carraway v. Sayad

717 S.W.2d 280 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1986

Moran v. Whaley, 608 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Mo.App.1980). The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the decision of the Board. Miller v. Whaley, 581 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Mo.App.1979). … Neither this court nor the Circuit Court may substitute its judgment for that of the administrative board. McNeal v. Bequette, 571 S.W.2d 657, 658 (Mo.App.1978).

State ex rel. Board of Health Center Trustees v. County Commission

896 S.W.2d 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 25, 1995

Bash v. Truman, 335 Mo. 1077 , 75 S.W.2d 840 (1934). … Lane v. Kirkpatrick, 485 S.W.2d 62, 64 (Mo.1972). As the requirement of mandamus has been met, this point is denied. V.

Phillips v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Bellefontaine Neighbors

308 S.W.2d 765 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1958

Brown v. Gambrel, 358 Mo. 192 , 213 S.W.2d 931 ; Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491 ; Cunningham v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., . 276 S.W.2d 633 ; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. … The Board of Adjustment has no authority to repeal an ordinance. It is an administrative body without a vestige of legislative authority. State ex rel. Nigro v. Kansas City, 325 Mo. 95 , 27 S.W.2d 1030 ; Wilson v.

Bittner v. City of St. Louis Police Board of Commissioners

925 S.W.2d 495 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1996

Further, in Peoples v. … Plummer v. Dace, 818 S.W.2d 317, 319 (Mo.App.1991).

Gannett Outdoor Co. of Kansas City v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

943 S.W.2d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1997

Lussow v. County Comm’n, 887 S.W.2d 815, 817 (Mo.App.1994); State ex rel. Barnes v. Hunter, 867 S.W.2d 282, 283-84 (Mo.App.1993). The failure of the parties to do so is fatal to this appeal. … Horn v.

Meredith v. Meredith

79 Mo. App. 636 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1899

Roselle v. Beckemeir, 134 Mo. 380 ; Clarkson v. Hatton, 143 Mo. 48 ; Lins v. Lenhardt, 127 Mo. 271 . … Thus in Honnett v.

Atchison v. Retirement Board of Police Retirement System of Kansas City

343 S.W.2d 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1961

In Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of Oklahoma City v. … Mott Store Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., 254 Mo. 654 , 163 S.W. 929 , loc. cit. 931; Brown v. Marshall, 241 Mo. 707 , 145 S.W. 810 ; State *34 ex rel. Klein v. Hughes, 351 Mo. 651 , 173 S.W.2d 877 , loc. cit. 880.

Golden Valley Memorial Hospital District v. Missouri State Board of Mediation

559 S.W.2d 581 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1977

This court held in Lincoln County Memorial Hospital v. Missouri State Board of Mediation, 549 S.W.2d 665 (Mo.App.1977) that an appeal must await the vote taken in the bargaining unit established by the Board. … Rel. v.

Matthew v. Smith

707 S.W.2d 411 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 25, 1986

Hudson, 400 S.W.2d 425 (Mo.App.1966); Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845, 851 (Mo.App.1964); Bartholomew v. Bd. of Zoning Adj., 307 S.W.2d 730 (Mo.App.1958). . … E.g., Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845 (Mo.App.1964). . We need not reach appellant’s charge of bias. Suffice it to say, that the Board acts as a quasi-judicial body and must assure a fair and impartial hearing.

Brinkerhoff Zinc Co. v. Boyd

192 Mo. 597 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 16, 1906

The trial resulted in a judgment for defendants Boyd and Brown, the trustee, and the plaintiff and the Bank of Aurora appeal. … Brown had notice of the plaintiff’s claim before he paid the money to Mr.

Client Services, Inc. v. Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education

30 S.W.3d 194 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2000

We agree with the-Board. It is well-settled that attorney’s fees are not assessable as costs against the state in the absence of a statute that explicitly provides for such assessment. Baumli v. … Ass’n v. Air Conservation Comm’n, 900 S.W.2d 263, 267 (Mo.App.1995).

State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Fallon

41 S.W.3d 474 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 2001

New York State Conference of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Ins. Co., 514 U.S. 645, 656 , 115 S.Ct. 1671 , 131 L.Ed.2d 695 (1995); see also Egelhoff v. … The Arizona Court of Appeals addressed a simhar argument in Murphy v. Board of Medical Examiners, 190 Ariz. 441 , 949 P.2d 530 (Ariz.Ct.App.1997).