Case law

Truitt v. Diggs

611 P.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 8, 1980

The Members of the Oklahoma City Board of Education, Paul English, Pat Potts, C. B. McCray, Armand Start, Freddye Williams, Floyd Don-werth, and Dene Brown; 4. … In making this argument, Appellant relies upon Hazlett v. Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County, 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 (1934).

Griffin v. State

90 Okla. Crim. 90 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1949

He further testified that he did not see any whisky bottles, that the card-board box was sealed, and that after the arrest they found a second card-board box of liquor in the defendant’s car. … In Farmer v. State, 86 Okla.

Lee v. Myles

390 P.2d 489 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 17, 1964

In Stubbs v. … In Scales v.

Brown v. Beckham County Detention Center

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 30, 2021

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JIMMIE BROWN, ) … See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); see also United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996).

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision v. Ray

64 O.B.A.J. 692 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 1992

DiMauro v. Oklahoma Stale Board of Medical Examiners, 769 P.2d 759, 762 (Okl.1989). 6 . 59 O.S. § 509(13). 7 . 59 O.S. § 503. See also, State v. … Board of Chiropractic Examiners v.

Board of Cty. Com'rs of Co. of Tulsa v. Williamson

370 P.2d 837 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 13, 1962

Webb & Co., 148 N.C. 120 , 61 S.E. 670 ; Bennett v. Board of Commissioners of Rockingham County, 173 N.C. 625 , 92 S.E. 603, 605 . … For reasons stated, the writ of mandamus that board seeks is hereby granted, and defendant is directed to approve the bonds in controversy. WILLIAMS, C. J., BLACKBIRD, V. C.

Oklahoma Fire Ins. Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.

34 Okla. 149 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 14, 1912

In the first case, service was made upon the city clerk and upon the chairman of the board of street commissioners, whilst the board was in session, in the absence of the mayor, who could not be found after diligent search … Co. v. Brown, 17 Wall. 445 , 21 L. Ed. 675 ; Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Bennett, 47 N. J. Law, 275; Delaware, etc., Ry. Co. v. Ditton, 36 N. J. Law, 361; Grubb v. Lancaster Mfg. Co., 10 Phila. (Pa.) 316; Commonwealth v.

Allen v. Wildman

38 Okla. 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1913

Co. v. Globe Hardware Co. (Ariz.) 129 Pac. 1104 ; Erickson v. State (Ariz.) 127 Pac. 754 . … Brown et al. v. First Na tional Bank of Temple, 35 Okla. 726 , 130 Pac. 140 ; Shuler v. Lashhorn, 67 Kan. 694 , 74 Pac. 264 .

State Ex Rel. Allen v. Board of Ed., Independent School Dist. No. 74

206 Okla. 699 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 24, 1952

Sweeney v. … In Hope v. U. S.

Pointer v. Hill

536 P.2d 358 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1975

In Brown Inv. Corp. v. Hickox, Okl., 369 P.2d 807 (1962), which is cited by the Court of Appeals, the plaintiff attached an affidavit to the appeal brief in an effort to establish proof of licensure. … In Loftis v. LaSalle, Okl., 434 P.2d 221 (1967), the plaintiff failed to-comply with § 855 at trial and submitted an affidavit *361 from the secretary of the Ada Board of Relators on appeal.

Fronczak v. WARDEN, EL RENO REFORMATORY, ETC.

431 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1976

Brown v. Lundgren, 528 F.2d 1050 (CA5 1976). The statement adequately advised the petitioner of the basis for the Board’s action. … In Brown v.

Muskogee County v. Muskogee Gas & Electric Co.

83 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1921

Cleal et al. v. Higginbothem et al., 49 Okla. 362 , 153 Pac. 64 ; Lowe et al. v. Consolidated School Dist., 79 Okla. 115 , 191 Pac. 737 .; Brown v. … In Board of Commissioners of Kingfisher County v.

Dority v. Green Country Castings Corp.

727 P.2d 1355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 22, 1986

Emp. v. Lockridge, 403 U.S. 274, 286 , 91 S.Ct. 1909, 1917 , 29 L.Ed.2d 473 [1971]. 13 . Belknap, Inc. v. Hale, 463 U.S. 491, 498-499 , 103 S.Ct. 3172, 3177 , 77 L.Ed.2d 798 [1983] and Brown v. … Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders, supra note 13, 468 U.S. at 503 , 104 S.Ct. at 3187 . 15 . Brown v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders, supra note 13. 16 . Farmer v.

Moore-Norman Area Vocational-Technical School District No. 17 v. Board of Trustees

519 P.2d 497 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1974

Latting v. Cordell (1946), 197 Okl. 369 , 172 P.2d 397 , quoted in Hines v. Winters (1957), Okl., 320 P.2d 1114, 1118 . … Sherrill v. Board of Trustees of South Oklahoma City Junior College, supra.

R & R Engineering Co. v. Board of Review OESC, Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

322 P.3d 471 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 14, 2014

Vester v. Board of Review of Okla. Employment Sec. Comm’n, 1985 OK 21, ¶ 10 , 697 P.2d 533 . … Quality v. Dep’t of Cent. Servs., 2008 OK CIV APP 30, ¶ 13 , 180 P.3d l.

Ellison v. Patman

199 Okla. 500 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1947

S. 1941 §391, it was the duty of the defendant board to proceed with recount irrespective of the service of notice upon Courtney in the manner and form and time provided by said section. The case of Looney v. … It was pointed out that such was the rule under the provisions of chapter 63, Session Laws of 1927, as was held in Brown v.

Excise Board of Coal County v. Hagar

155 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1932

From said judgment granting injunction, the excise board of Coal county duly perfected appeal to this court. … City National Bank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233 , 253 P. 481 .

Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers

917 F. Supp. 1514 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 12, 1995

Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Comm’rs, 27 F.3d 1499 (10th Cir.1994) (the “Opinion”). The case was transferred to this Court on March 7,1995. … Supplemental Brief of Board at 11-12. A motion for summary judgment, however, cannot be defeated by bare assertions in the brief of the party opposing the motion. Cole v. Ruidoso Mun.

Webster v. Morris

129 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1928

In the case of Smartt v. … Com. v. Wyatt, Rand. 694; Rose v. Brown, 11 W. Va. 142 ; Welch v. County Court, 29 W. Va. 63 ; Abbott v. L’Hommedieu, 10 W. Va. 677 .

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Higgs

42 Okla. 171 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1914

Co. v. Ward, 32 Okla. 187 , 120 Pac. 982 ; A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & Young, 26 Okla. 359 , 109 Pac. 551 ; Pacific Ry. Co. v. Brown, 14 Kan. 469 ; A., T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis, 31 Kan. 645 , 3 Pac. 301 ; St. … Co. v. Brown, 32 Okla. 483 , 122 Pac. 136 ; Midland Valley R. Co. v. Bryant, 37 Okla. 206 , 131 Pac. 678 . The plaintiff evidently relies upon sections 1389, 1390, 1391, and 1392, Comp. Laws 1909 (Rev.