Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.92s

  • Kelly v. Carteret County Board of Education

    149 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2002

    Tina Kelly (Plaintiff) appeals an order filed 19 January 2001 granting a motion to dismiss in favor of Carteret County Board of Education, David Lenker, Jr., Renee Newman, and John Welmers (collectively, Defendants). … See Coman v. Thomas Manufg. Co., Inc., 325 N.C. 172, 175 , 381 S.E.2d 445, 447 (1989) (a cause of action exists for wrongful discharge for refusal to violate public policy).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Britt v. N.C. State Board of Education

    320 N.C. 790 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 7, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Graham & Son, Inc. v. Board of Education

    287 N.C. 465 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1975

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Britt v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    86 N.C. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

    See also generally, Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 26 N.C. App. 114 , 214 S.E. 2d 412 (1975). … In Brown v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Spikes

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 2024

    FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:24-cv-00249-MR-WCM THURMAN BROWN … Vuyyuru v. Jadhav, 555 F.3d 337, 347 (4th Cir. 2009). “Thus, when a district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over an action, the action must be dismissed.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sigmon v. Brown

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 16, 2024

    See Celotex Corp. v. … See Bailey v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Oct 15, 2024

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION No. 3:20-CV-328-GCM TAMINA BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff … After considering the factors identified by the Fourth Circuit in Mudd v. Barnhart, 418 F.3d 424, 428 (4th Cir. 2005), the Court finds the fees requested to be reasonable.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Triangle Air Cond. v. Board of Education

    306 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 25, 1982

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carr v. Saul

    District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Mar 31, 2022

    Grayson O Co. v. … (alterations omitted) (quoting Brown v. Nucor Corp., 785 F.3d 895, 932 (4th Cir. 2015)); see also Steves & Sons, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Galloway v. Board of Education of Brunswick County

    184 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 25, 1922

    Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., *248 300; Hammond v. McRae, 182 N. C., 747 . … Griffith v. Board of Education, 183 N. C., 408 ; Allen v. Reidsville, 178 N. C., 513 ; Sasser v. Haurriss, 178 N. C., 322 ; Moore v. Monument Go., 166 N. 0., 211; Piclcler v. Board of Education, 149 N. C., 221 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rivenbark v. Pender County Board of Education

    94 N.C. App. 703 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 18, 1989

    In this suit by a school board member against the Pender County Board of Education (“Board”), the question presented is whether the Board could renew the county superintendent’s contract in the last fiscal year of the contract … , argues that the legislature intended in Section 115C-271 to prohibit a “lame duck” board from imposing an unwanted superintendent upon an incoming board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    266 N.C. 761 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 30, 1966

    Decisions supporting the quoted statement and cited texts include the following; Lincoln Parish School Board v. … Paraphrasing the language of Brown, J., in Raleigh v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Foster v. NASH-ROCKY MOUNT CTY. BD. OF EDUC.

    665 S.E.2d 745 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2008

    James v. Board of Education, 60 N.C.App. 642, 648 , 300 S.E.2d 21, 24 (1983); Payne, 95 N.C.App. at 313 , 382 S.E.2d at 452 . … Further, even were we to address the theory of respondeat superior, defendant Board would only be liable for torts committed by defendant Brown, its agent. See, e.g., Snow v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fothergill v. Jones County Board of Education

    841 F. Supp. 2d 915 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jan 8, 2012

    Plaintiffs are correct to note that, in Corum v. … Nor can Plaintiffs establish that the School Board was required to provide additional resources to Matthew in the aftermath of the relationship. See King v. Beaufort Cnty.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dover Lumber Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    173 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1917

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gay v. Wake County Board of Education

    254 N.C. 622 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1961

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edwards v. Board of Education of Yancey County

    235 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1952

    Board of Education, 233 N.C. 400 , 64 S.E. 2d 403 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education, supra. … Board of Education, 183 N.C. 570 , 112 S.E. 246 ; Pemberton v. Board of Education, 172 N.C. 552 , 90 S.E. 578 ; Newton v. School Committee, 158 N.C. 186, 73 S.E. 886 ; Pickler v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Federal Paper Board Co. v. Kamyr, Inc.

    328 N.C. 570 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cafiero v. North Carolina Board of Nursing

    102 N.C. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1991

    a different result had the matter been before it de novo. ” Thompson v. … Hobbs v. Moore County, 267 N.C. 665, 671 , 149 S.E.2d 1, 5 (1966). Petitioner maintains that the Board misinterpreted § 90-171.37(4) not only with regard to “engages” but also with regard to “conduct.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of Education

    329 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.