Case law

Brown v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 2, 2019

On July 1, 2019, movant Parrish Brown filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, challenging the judgment entered in U.S. v. Brown, No. 4:15-cr-520-JAR-1 (E.D. Mo. … See Day v.

Dart Truck Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

299 S.W.2d 881 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1957

Defendant did not appeal. *883 Plaintiff contends that the circuit court “erred in failing to reverse outright the Board of Zoning Adjustment rather than merely modifying the Board’s order.” … Horn v. Randall, Mo.App., 275 S.W.2d 758 , a reviewing court may not decide the cause de novo. It is so ordered. All concur.

Brown v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 10, 2019

U.S. v. Parrish Brown, No. 4:15- cr-520-JAR (E.D. Mo. 2016). On December 13, 2016 he was sentenced to serve sixty months’ imprisonment. … See Kreutzer v.

Arnold Shute v. Board of Zoning Adjustments of Franklin County, Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 2025

In Point V, he claims he had no duty to preserve his arguments because the Board’s hearing was a noncontested case under Chapter 536. … In Point V, Shute argues he need not preserve his arguments because the Board’s hearing was a noncontested case.

State ex rel. Koster v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

532 S.W.3d 191 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 15, 2017

Shelton v. Koster, 360 S.W.3d 805, 809 (Mo. App. … The Board’s reliance on State ex rel. Barrett v. Boeckeler Lumber Co., 302 Mo. 187 , 257 S.W. 453 (Mo. banc 1924), is misplaced.

Cousin's Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City

78 S.W.3d 774 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2002

Manes v. Depew, 987 S.W.2d 527, 529 (Mo.App.1999). … Louis County v.

City of Sullivan v. Truckstop Restaurants, Inc.

142 S.W.3d 181 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2004

The situation in this case is unlike that in Bill’s Coal Company, Inc. v. Board of Public Utilities of Springfield, Missouri, 887 F.2d 242 (10th Cir.1989). … De-Maranville, et al. v.

Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Woods

77 Mo. 197 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883

In a wider sense, I think, the bond is germane to the corporate objects of the school board. … The object and purpose of the bond being entirely within the powers of the board, and the board being constituted the trustee’ of an express trust in the bond, the right to sue on it ought not to be questioned.

Brown El v. Weaver

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 9, 2019

P. 41(b); see also Link v. Wabash R.R. … v.

McCune v. Goodwillie

204 Mo. 306 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 29, 1907

Loring, 63 Mo. 19 ; State ex rel. v. Zachritz, 166 Mo. l. c. 313; Coney v. Laird, 153 Mo. 408 ; Penn v. Hayward, 14 Oh. St. 302; Burnley v. Stevenson, 24 Oh. St. 474; Fox v. … [Mudd v. Dillon, 166 Mo. l. c. 118-119; Huey v. Huey, 65 Mo. l. c. 694, et seq.; Cravens v. Rossiter, 116 Mo. 338 ; Sullivan v. Eddy, 154 Ill. 199 ; Alexander v. DeKermel, 81 Ky. 345 ; Metcalfe v.

Spencer v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

388 S.W.3d 540 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 2012

They sued the Board for violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act, ch. 213, RSMo, and for breach of contract. … See Spencer v. Zobrist, 323 S.W.3d 391 (Mo.App. W.D.2010); Schnell v. Zobrist, 323 S.W.3d 403 (Mo.App. W.D.2010). The Circuit Court of Daviess County granted summary judgment to the Board. Spencer and Schnell appeal.

Perez v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

803 S.W.2d 160 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1991

State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150, 159 (Mo. App.1974). … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d at 157-58 . Dr.

ND-Sell, Inc. v. Greater Springfield Board of Realtors, Inc.

224 S.W.3d 623 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2007

Ortmann v. Dace Homes, Inc., 86 S.W.3d 86, 88 (Mo.App. E.D.2002). The trial court’s interpretation of the contract, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. Helterbrand v. … Martin v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co., 996 S.W.2d 506, 511 (Mo. banc 1999).

Willis v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis

307 S.W.3d 186 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2010

Louis Public Schools, appeals the trial court’s judgment affirming the decision of the Board of Education of the City of St. Louis to terminate her employment for violating Board Regulations.

Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.

223 Mo. App. 793 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1930

Brown (Ky), 3 S.W.2d 199 , it appeared that Brown was employed at the mines of the coal company, which, for the convenience of itself and its employees, maintained roads through its property. … While walking home from his work Brown stumbled on a stone in one of these roads, and was thereby injured.

State v. Smith

384 S.W.2d 516 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 9, 1964

the Hodiamont car tracks where he boarded an eastbound streetcar. … State v. Simler, 350 Mo. 646 , 167 S.W.2d 376, 383 .

United States v. Real Estate Board of Metropolitan St. Louis

59 F.R.D. 637 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 4, 1973

The complaint charges that defendant Real Estate Board of Metropolitan St. … Louis; to restrict membership in the Board; and to adopt other rales and regulations which limit competition among members of the Board.

Byous v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System Board of Trustees

157 S.W.3d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2005

We do not substitute our judgment for that of the Board; we instead ascertain whether the Board could “reasonably have made its findings and reached its decision on the basis of all the evidence before it.” Hay v. … N.H.Rev.Stat. § 281:2, V-a (2008).

Evans v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

327 F. Supp. 1261 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · May 27, 1971

See also: Hyser v. Reed, 115 U.S.App.D.C. 254 , 318 F.2d 225 (1963), cert. den. Thompson v. United States Board of Parole, 375 U.S. 957 , 84 S.Ct. 446 , 11 L.Ed.2d 315 (1963); Allen v. … As opposed to the welfare recipient in Goldberg v.

State v. Hack

118 Mo. 92 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 21, 1893

This evidence was offered for the purpose of proving by the admission of Brown that he had *99 committed the larceny and not the defendant on trial. This evidence was mere hearsay and clearly inadmissible. State v. … It was held by this court in the case of State v.