Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.76s
6 F. Cas. 542 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1827
Brown is not evidence against his co-defendant Mr. … Gunnis et al. v. Erhart, 1 H. Bl. 289. The fact, therefore, must be considered as established, that Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished59 A.3d 967 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 2013
Brown.” Shortly after the court gave the instruction, counsel for Brown called the trial court’s attention to this court’s opinion in Crowder v. … Similarly, in Green v.
Cited 6 timesPublished683 A.2d 118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 1996
Carter v. United States, 614 A.2d 913, 919 (D.C.1992). … Ford, supra, 549 A.2d at 1126 (quoting Rogers v.
Cited 39 timesPublished663 F.2d 272 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 1981
The Board has wide latitude to exercise its remedial powers under the Act. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 215-17 , 85 S.Ct. 398, 405-06 , 13 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964); NLRB v. … San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers v. NLRB, 501 F.2d 794 , 802 (D.C.Cir.1974).
Cited 56 timesPublished422 A.2d 1281 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1980
422 A.2d 1281 (1980) UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Willie BROWN, Jr., Appellee. No. 79-1016. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 9, 1980. Decided October 14, 1980. *1282 Richard C. Bicki, Asst. U. S. … United States v.
Cited 15 timesPublished795 A.2d 56 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2002
Brown thus received a total sentence on the armed rape and sodomy charges of twenty-six to seventy-eight years of imprisonment. This court affirmed Brown’s convictions on direct appeal in Brown v. … Neverdon v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2010
District Ct bankruptcy Courts for the District of Columbia ) Shiron Brown, … ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 F. Cas. 694 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished12 F. Cas. 309 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished6 F. Cas. 544 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1839
Cited 0 timesPublished10 F. Cas. 1067 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1824
Brown, and he believes this to be the one which is filed in this cause. … See Chitty, 35, 47, 180; Cromwell v. Hinson, 2 Esp. Rep. 512; 5 Ib. 175; Chitty, 236, note; Id. 409.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoneywell International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
253 F.3d 119 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 2001
See Allied Chem. & Alkali Workers v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., 404 U.S. 157, 159 (1971); UAW v. NLRB, 765 F.2d 175, 1799-80 (D.C. Cir. 1985). … But the federal courts, not the Board, are legislatively empowered to be the primary inter- preters of contracts. See Litton Fin. Printing Div. v.
Cited 8 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 425 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1821
Cited 0 timesPublished13 F. Cas. 115 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1822
The demand, upon the acceptor, who resided in Alexandria. was made on Saturday, the 16th, and notice was given by mail of the 18th to the defendant, Brown, who resided in Washington.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 F. Cas. 422 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1810
Cited 0 timesPublished4 F. Cas. 426 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 7, 1843
The attorney for the corporation, said that this very point was decided in the case of Nichols v. … Brown was in the employment of Hon. Daniel Webster, then a senator of congress, at the time of the arrest, the act has no application to him, and affords no justification to the officer making the arrest.
Cited 0 timesPublished923 F. Supp. 2d 118 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2013
Plaintiff’s claims based on whistleblowing, disability discrimination and reprisal have been dismissed, see Brown v. Vilsack, 866 F. … White v. Tapella, 876 F.
Cited 2 timesPublished384 A.2d 647 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1978
United States v. Jenkins, 525 F.2d 819 (6th Cir. 1975); United States v. Baller, 519 F.2d 463 (4th Cir. 1975); United States v. … United States v. McDaniel, 176 U.S.App.D.C. 60 , 538 F.2d 408 (1976); United States v. Addison, 162 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 498 F.2d 741 (1974); People v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2010
The complaints against the defendants with the surname Brown allege l Shiron Brown v. Marz'a Robz`nson,' Shiron Brown v. Shirley Randall; Shiron Brown v. F reda Berrz`s; Shz'ron Brown v. … Thomasz`na Brown; Shiron Brown v. James Brown,' and Shiron Brown v. Mz`chelle Boris. also some kind of identity fraud, and contain other unintelligible allegations. See, e.g., Compl., Shiron Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna