Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

3.75s

  • Edwards v. Board of Education of Yancey County

    235 N.C. 345 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1952

    Board of Education, 233 N.C. 400 , 64 S.E. 2d 403 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education, supra. … Board of Education, 183 N.C. 570 , 112 S.E. 246 ; Pemberton v. Board of Education, 172 N.C. 552 , 90 S.E. 578 ; Newton v. School Committee, 158 N.C. 186, 73 S.E. 886 ; Pickler v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Long v. Winston-Salem Board of Adjustment

    22 N.C. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1974

    A board of adjustment’s denial of a special use permit should be based on findings of fact supported by competent, material and substantial evidence. Refining Co. v. … Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 , and cases cited therein. The Board made no findings of fact.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allen v. City of Burlington Board of Adjustment

    100 N.C. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1990

    Concerned Citizens of Downtown Asheville v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Asheville, 94 N.C. App. 364 , 380 S.E.2d 130 (1989). … See Cieszko v. Clark, 92 N.C. App. 290 , 374 S.E.2d 456 (1988).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Terminal Warehouse Corp.

    44 N.C. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1979

    Board of Transportation v. Brown, 34 N.C. App. 266, 268 , 237 S.E. 2d 854, 855 (1977), aff’d, 296 N.C. 250 , 249 S.E. 2d 803 (1978). … See, e.g., Yowmans v. Hendersonville, 175 N.C. 574 , 96 S.E. 45 (1918); Dunlap v. Light Co., 212 N.C. 814 , 195 S.E. 43 (1938); Midgett v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Board of Transportation v. Terminal Warehouse Corp., 300 N.C. 700 (1980)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dare County Board of Education v. Sakaria

    340 N.C. 567 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 27, 1995

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boehm v. North Carolina Board of Podiatry Examiners

    41 N.C. App. 567 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1979

    Utilities Comm. v. Electric Membership Corp., 276 N.C. 108 , 171 S.E. 2d 406 (1970); Davis v. Davis, 11 N.C. App. 115 , 180 S.E. 2d 374 (1971). … Turner v. Board of Education, 250 N.C. 456 , 109 S.E. 2d 211 (1959).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of Education

    329 N.C. 495 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1991

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ennett v. Cumberland County Board of Education

    698 F. Supp. 2d 557 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Mar 21, 2010

    In Wagoner v. … Jackson v. FKI Logistex, 608 F.Supp.2d 705 (E.D.N.C.2009) (citing McLean v. Patten Cmtys., Inc., 332 *562 F.3d 714 (4th Cir.2003)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

    317 N.C. 254 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

    The plaintiff alleged that the defendant North Carolina Board of Transportation (hereinafter “BOT”) had taken a compensable interest in Lea Company’s property as a result of intermittent and recurring flooding caused by inadequately … Georgia Pacific v. United States, 640 F. 2d 328 (Ct. Cl. 1980); Miller v. United States, 620 F. 2d 812 (Ct. Cl. 1980); Tektronix, Inc. v. United States, 575 F. 2d 832 (Ct. Cl. 1978); Pitcarin v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hallyburton v. Board of Education of Burke County

    213 N.C. 9 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1938

    Burke County, through its board of county commissioners and at the request of the board of education, is negotiating a loan from the State Literary Fund in the sum of $37,000 for the purpose of erecting and equipping certain … The language of Article V, sec. 4, as it presently exists is unambiguous, plain and direct. Its terms are definite and certain.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mallard v. Mallard

    234 N.C. 654 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1951

    Young v. Young, 225 N.C. 340 , 34 S.E. 2d 154 ; Moody v. Moody, 225 N.C. 89 , 33 S.E. 2d 491 ; Byers v. Byers, 222 N.C. 298 , 22 S.E. 2d 902 . … Byers v. Byers, supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Carteret County Board of Education

    149 N.C. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2002

    Tina Kelly (Plaintiff) appeals an order filed 19 January 2001 granting a motion to dismiss in favor of Carteret County Board of Education, David Lenker, Jr., Renee Newman, and John Welmers (collectively, Defendants). … See Coman v. Thomas Manufg. Co., Inc., 325 N.C. 172, 175 , 381 S.E.2d 445, 447 (1989) (a cause of action exists for wrongful discharge for refusal to violate public policy).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Story v. Board of Commissioners of Alamance County

    184 N.C. 336 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 8, 1922

    IX, sec. 2; Riggsbee v. Durham, 94 N. C., 800 ; Puitt, v. Comrs., ibid., 709; Markham v. Manning, 96 N. C., 132 . Tbe plaintiff next contends that tbe election can be ordered, if at all,, only under the provisions of C. … In Weesner v. Davidson, 182 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Linder v. Wake County Board of Education

    50 N.C. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 20, 1981

    equipped to provide their child with the appropriate education that is her right, G.S. 115-363 and -364, and further that the school might be forced to close its doors if it does not receive funds from either the Wake County Board … They contend that this statute confers on them standing to appeal the decision of the Wake County School Board not to pay the Frankie Lemmon School for their daughter’s education because the decision threatens their daughter

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. Wilkes County Board of Commissioners

    37 N.C. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 11, 1978

    As to compensation, G.S. 163-35(c) reads: “The executive secretary shall be paid compensation as recommended by the county board of elections and approved by the respective boards of county commissioners. … The authority to determine the level of compensation above that statutory minimum is in the board of county commissioners, not the board of elections which had only the power to recommend.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • White v. North Carolina Board of Pharmacy

    35 N.C. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1978

    The Uniform Revocation of Licenses, G.S. 150-9 et seq., which was effectively repealed after the hearing in question, defined “board” to exclude the North Carolina Board of Pharmacy (G.S. 150-9). … Assuming that incompetent evidence was admitted by the Board we can find no prejudice to petitioner. The Board’s conclusions were based upon facts supported by competent evidence.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION

    661 S.E.2d 735 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

    661 S.E.2d 735 (2008) Alicia MOORE v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION. No. 503P07. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 10, 2008. Luke Largess, Charlotte, for Alicia Moore. H. … Landis Wade, Charlotte, Melissa Kidd, for Board of Education. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 649 S.E.2d 410 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sparrow v. Forsyth County Board of Education

    19 N.C. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Battle v. President of the Literary Board

    28 N.C. 203 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1845

    accounts of them, like other acts of the Board. … Besides, this Board could delegate no such authority to any one.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dover Lumber Co. v. Board of Commissioners

    173 N.C. 117 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 14, 1917

    In Banlcs v. Lane, 170 N. 0., 14; s. c., 171 N. 0., 505, tbe landowner bad been made a party, and was duly assessed. … Timber Co. v. Wells, 171 N. C., 264 , and cases cited.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.