Case law

Frederick v. Shinseki

684 F.3d 1263 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jul 3, 2012

Frederick appealed to the Board of Veterans Appeals. … Further, the Secretary correctly posits that the rule of interpretative doubt favoring veterans in Brown v.

Katherine Richards Brewer, derivatively on behalf of Regions Financial Corporation and Regions Bank v. Josh M. Turner, Jr.

Court of Chancery of Delaware · Sep 29, 2025

The Senators’ Letters In April 2020, Regions received letters from Senators Cory Booker and Sherrod Brown encouraging Regions to stop charging overdraft fees during the COVID-19 pandemic. … BioScrip, Inc. v.

Levesque v. Hudson

106 N.H. 470 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Oct 29, 1965

Bouley v. Nashua, 106 N. H. 79; Fortuna v. Zoning Board of Manchester, 95 N. H. 211. … Bouley v. Nashua, supra. See Suprenant v. Nashua, 101 N. H. 43.

In Re Estate of Davis

308 S.W.3d 832 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2010

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … Calaway v. Schucker, 193 S.W.3d 509 (Tenn. 2005), and Penley v.

State v. Brown

51 Kan. App. 2d 876 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Sep 4, 2015

See United States v. Segal, 549 F.2d 1293, 1298-1300 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 431 U.S. 919 (1977); United States v. Williams, 321 Fed. Appx. 486, 489-90 (6th Cir. 2009); Finney v. … See State v. Billings, 30 Kan.

Kuhlman v. State

317 Ga. 232 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Sep 6, 2023

V (b) (1). … State v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown

217 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1970

Brown, appellant, filed a petition for support in Cumberland County, the county of her residence, in accordance with the Civil Procedural Support Act, Act of July 13, 1953, P. L. 431, 62 P.S. §2043.31 et seq. … Brown, to pay $20 per week for the support of their son Edward, and denying support for her. Appellant appeals from that part of the order of August 16, 1969, which denied support for her.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Brown v. Brown

254 Pa. Super. 410 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1978

Halderman v. Halderman, 230 Pa.Super. 125 , 326 A.2d 908 (1974); Shuster v. Shuster, 226 Pa.Super. 542 , 323 A.2d 760 (1974); Commonwealth v. Testa, 226 Pa.Super. 585 , 323 A.2d 199 (1974).” Commonwealth ex rel. Hall v. … See Jack v. Jack, 253 Pa.Super. 538 , 385 A.2d 469 (1978); Wiegand v. Wiegand, 242 Pa.Super. 170 , 363 A.2d 1215 (1976); Kayaian v. Kayaian, 223 Pa.Super. 103 , 297 A.2d 136 (1972).

Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. Francois

832 F. Supp. 2d 1364 · District Court, N.D. Florida · May 27, 2011

A physician who violates the Florida referral statute is subject to disciplinary action by the medical board. § 456.053(5)(f), Fla. Stat. … Browning, 522 F.3d 1153, 1167 (11th Cir.2008). *1367 Sometimes, a federal law contains an express statement that it is displacing state law, making the federal law the sole governing standard. Id.

State v. Brown

236 N.J. 497 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 2019

The panel, citing Giglio v. … State v. Hegel , 113 N.J. Super. 193 , 202, 273 A.2d 383 (App. Div. 1971) (quoting State v.

Brown v. Brown

704 S.W.2d 524 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 1986

Appellant Dawn Marie Richards Brown appeals from a judgment granting appellee Horace Brown a divorce, on grounds of cruelty, and voiding two post-marital agreements. … Gentry v. Gentry, supra; McDonald v. McDonald, 316 S.W.2d 780 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1958, no writ); Daughtry v. Daughtry, 312 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1958, no writ).

Brown v. Brown

74 Va. Cir. 260 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · Oct 11, 2007

Butler v. Butler, 221 Va. 1035, 1037-38 , 277 S.E.2d 180, 181-82 (1981); see Diaz v. Diaz, 568 F.2d 1061, 1063 (4th Cir. 1977). This exception to sovereign immunity is implemented in the Commonwealth by Va. … Jur. 2d, Divorce and Separation, § 869 (1998); see, e.g., Joe v. Joe, 891 So. 2d 879 (Ala. Civ.

Brown v. Brown

800 S.W.2d 801 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1990

Brown, appellant, filed his pro se brief with this court. … Roden v. Tofle, 779 S.W.2d 290 (Mo.App.1989), In Re marriage of Sowers, 733 S.W.2d 19 (Mo.App.1987). Mr. Brown’s brief fails to comply with the requirements *802 of Rule 84.04 Missouri Supreme Court Rule.

Martin v. Brown

123 N.E.3d 712 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 2019

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Lansdale

172 F. Supp. 2d 636 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Jul 30, 2001

See Arizona v. … See RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF JUDGMENTS § 25 (1971) (claim preclusion applies even when new grounds or theories or evidence is presented or new remedies or forms of relief are sought); Brown v.

Polaris Sales, Inc. v. HERITAGE IMPORTS

879 So. 2d 1129 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 2003

Cherry, Bekaert Holland v. Brown , 582 So.2d 502 , 506 (Ala. 1991). … SEE, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

V. . Brown

2 N.C. 227 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1795

That the indisposition or death of the witness is to be proven by others is strongly implied in the words used in Fry v.

People v. Brown

243 N.E.3d 249 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 27, 2023

People v. Taylor, 2023 IL 128316, ¶ 45; People v. Vingara, 2023 IL App (5th) 230698, ¶ 14; People v. Rios, 2023 IL App (5th) 230724, ¶ 8. … Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners, 2012 IL 111928, ¶ 48. The best indication of the legislature’s intent is the plain language of the statute. Id. We must evaluate the statute as a whole.

State v. Brown

170 Idaho 439 · Idaho Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2022

State v. McIntosh, 160 Idaho 1, 6, 368 P.3d 621, 626 (2016). Generally, once a defendant is placed into actual physical custody of the Board of Corrections, the district court’s jurisdiction is extinguished. State v. … Next, if the district court orders a rider under section 19-2601(4), the district court retains jurisdiction of the defendant, which in essence means it shares “concurrent” jurisdiction with the Board. State v.

In Re the Personal Restraint of Myers

105 Wash. 2d 257 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1986

Accordingly, we hold that Parole Board Rule 2.081 is invalid. See RCW 9.95.150; Baker v. Morris, supra. … V Because the Board has paroled Myers, a remand to the Board to recompute his sentence would serve no purpose.