Case law

School District of Kansas City v. Missouri Board of Fund Commissioners

384 S.W.3d 238 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2012

(quoting Brown, v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955)). … See Board of Educ. of Oklahoma City Public Schools, Independent School Dist. No. 89, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma v.

Dent v. Sigerson

29 Mo. 489 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1860

Our conclusion is, then, that Brown’s survey, being a legal and approved survey in 1884, must prevail over a title emanating from the United States two years afterwards. In McGill v. … Justice Catron in Le Bois v.

Tendai v. Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

161 S.W.3d 358 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 2005

Haase v. Garfinkel, 418 S.W.2d 108, 118 (Mo.1967); Swope v. Printz, 468 S.W.2d 34, 39 (Mo. 1971). “The appropriate standard of care is a question of law.” Lopez v. Three Rivers Elec. … See, e.g., Fowler v. Park Corp., 673 S.W.2d 749 (Mo. banc 1984); Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 428 S.W.2d 596 (Mo.1968). In Duncan v. Mo. Bd. for Architects, Prof.

Hoffmann v. Kinealy

389 S.W.2d 745 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 10, 1965

When the same factual situation was presented a second time in Brown v. … Women’s Christian Ass’n. of Kansas City v. Brown, 354 Mo. 700, 709 , 190 S.W.2d 900, 906 ; Brown v. Gambrel, 358 Mo. 192 , 213 S.W.2d 931, 935 ; State ex rel. Capps v.

Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis v. Daly

129 S.W.3d 405 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 2004

Perry State Bank v. Farmers Alliance, 953 S.W.2d 155, 157 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). … City of Kansas City v. Baker, 793 S.W.2d 646, 648 (Mo.App.

State ex rel. Allen v. Walker

80 Mo. 610 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1883

Brown v. … Brown v. Holladay. In order to award a peremptory mandamus here, we must.so construe the act of 1883 as to give it retrospective effect, and this cannot be done, unless it be warranted by its terms.

Lappin v. Prebe

345 Mo. 68 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 12, 1939

[Bates v. Brown Shoe Co. (1938), 342 Mo. 411 , 418[1], 116 S.W.2d 31 , 33[1].] Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Chamberlain, 288 U.S. 333 , 341, 53 Sup. … (Banc), 244 Mo. 76 , 95, 148 S.W. 925, 930 ; Rashall v. St. Louis, I.M. S. Ry. Co., 249 Mo. 509 , 522, 155 S.W. 426, 430 ; Brown v.

Angelos v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

90 S.W.3d 189 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2002

The licensee may waive the Board hearing, in which case the Commission’s recommendation is the disciplinary order. The final decision of the Commission and Board is then subject to judicial review. Bodenhausen v. … Kraus v. Director of Revenue, 935 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Mo.App.1996); see also Ferrarlo v.

State Ex Rel. Lute v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

218 S.W.3d 431 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 17, 2007

V, sec. 4. This Court issues writs of mandamus ordering the Board to promptly conduct parole hearings for Lute and Branch in accordance with this opinion. I. … See State v. Branch, *435 757 S.W.2d 595 (Mo.App.1988). She was convicted again on March 3, 1989, of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for 50 years. State v.

State ex rel. Chapman v. Walbridge

153 Mo. 194 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1899

Walbridge, 119 Mo. 383 ; State ex rel. v. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 19 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 57 Mo. App. 199 ; State ex rel. v. Police Comms., 14 Mo. App. 297 ; s. c., 88 Mo. 144 ; Mechem’s Pub. Off. and Offs., sec. 454.] … [Givens v. Daviess Co., 107 Mo. 603 ; Gammon v. Lafayette Co., 76 Mo. 675 ; State ex rel. v. Carr, 3 Mo. App. 6 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 146 Mo. 401 ; Fitzsimmons v. Brooklyn, 102 N. Y. 536 ; Andrews v.

Allen v. Green Ridge R-VIII School Dist.

892 S.W.2d 635 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1994

At this meeting, Brown informed Allen that the school board had decided to reassign Allen permanently to Sedalia. … See Chilton v.

Brown v. Riverview FPD

District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 28, 2021

See, e.g., Brown v. Unknown McShane, et al., No. 4:13-cv-558-DDN (E.D. Mo. 2013); Brown v. BHC (State Government Agency), et al., No. 4:10-cv-173-TIA (E.D. Mo. 2010); Brown v. … Mo. 2009); Brown v. St. Louis Election Board, No. 4:08-CV-1164 CAS (E.D. Mo. 2008); Brown v. Missouri Division of Fire Safety, No. 4:07-CV-1840 MLM (E.D. Mo. 2007).

Basye v. Fayette R-III School District Board of Education

150 S.W.3d 111 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 21, 2004

They also alleged that the Fayette R-III School District Board of Education also claims an interest in the Union School lot “for school purposes” and that the lot ceased being used “for school purposes” when public school … Although the Supreme Court held in Powell v. Powell, 267 Mo. 117 , 183 S.W. 625, 628 (1916), and later in Kline v.

Roach v. Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools

77 Mo. 484 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1883

This is a petition in the nature of a bill of injunction against the Board of President and Birectors of the St. … On the other hand, it is insisted by defendant, first, that no such restriction is imposed on the power of its school board; and that its schools are public schools, for the education and instruction of its pupils in such

Liddell v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis

567 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 5, 1983

Armstrong v. Board of School Directors, 616 F.2d 305, 312-14 (7th Cir.1980). … was created pursuant to state constitutional and statutory authority before the United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v.

Dent v. Bingham

8 Mo. 579 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1844

said Brown, if not made in conformity to the claim to commons by the inhabitants of Carondelet before the old board of commissioners, as given in evidence by the plaintiff, is no evidence of the extent or boundary of said … Brown forty years afterwards.

Brown v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Dec 7, 2020

United States v. Brown, 727 Fed.App’x 902, 907-8 (8th Cir. 2018). … Brown, agree and accept the following facts in this case to be proven: That prior to July 27, 2015, the defendant, Deandre E.

Merideth v. Board of Education of Rockwood R-6 School District

513 S.W.2d 740 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1974

In addition, the evidence must be considered in a light most favorable to the board’s decision, together with all reasonable inferences which support it. Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. … Hanebrink v. Parker, supra, p. 458.

Brown v. Santander USA

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 29, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CORNELIUS BROWN, et al. … P. 41(b); and Brown v. Frey, 806 F.2d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1986) (stating that district court may dismiss a pro se litigant’s action for failure to comply with a court order on its own initiative).

State Ex Rel. Wood v. Board of Educ. of St. Louis

357 Mo. 147 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 8, 1947

Brown v. Board of Education, [ 294 Mo. 106 , 242 S. W. 85 ; 299 Mo. 465 , 253 S. W. 973 ], heretofore discussed, establish some sort of tenure for the teachers . . . … The Board could not arbitrarily discharge a teacher . . . ” Gartenbach v. Board of Education, 356 Mo. 890 , 204 S. W. (2d) 273 .