Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

4.57s

  • Brown v. Corizon Inc.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 10, 2023

    Brown brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deliberately indifferent medical and dental care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. … See King v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. Boyd

    108 Mo. App. 518 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1904

    This-definition of duplicity in an indictment is approvingly citedMn State v. Fox, 148 Mo. 1 . c. 525. In State v. Healy, 50 Mo. … State v. Kennedy, 63 Iowa 200 , 18 N. W. 885 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Francois v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    880 S.W.2d 601 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 1994

    State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (Board), appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis reversing the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) denying Dr. … U.S. v. Francois, No. S1-86-292CR(4) (E.D.Mo. March 24, 1988).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Corizon Inc.

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 28, 2022

    Brown. First, Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or without prepayment of the required filing fees and costs. ECF No. 2. … See Topchian v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis v. Daly

    272 S.W.3d 228 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2008

    Louis County v. … Louis County v. Dunne, 421 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Mo.banc 1967) and Kostman v. Pine Lawn Bank & Trust Co., 540 S.W.2d 72, 78 (Mo.banc 1976).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Casey v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    830 S.W.2d 478 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1992

    The Board can promulgate rules and regulations only to the extent of and within the delegated authority of the legislative grant. Missouri Hospital Association v. … O’Flaherty v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 680 S.W.2d 153 , (Mo. banc 1984) [2].

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Palmer v. Van Buren R-1 Board of Education

    872 S.W.2d 590 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1994

    This court’s review is directed to the findings and decision of the school board, an administrative agency, not the judgment of the trial court. City of Cabool v. … [Harrisburg R-VIII School Dist. v. O’Brian, 540 S.W.2d 945, 950 (Mo.App.1976) ]. See also, Mo-Kan Airport Passenger Service, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Howard v. Smith

    15 Mo. App. 412 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1884

    , who was confirmed by the president of the board of public improvements. … The State ex rel. v. Smith, 5 Mo. App. 427 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 24, 2022

    United States v. Davis, 604 F.2d 474, 485 (7th Cir. 1979). Movant is challenging his criminal conviction for deprivation of rights under color of law. See United States v. … See United States v. Brown, No. 21-3807 (8th Cir. filed Dec. 6, 2021). Movant’s appeal is still pending. Movant has not demonstrated any need for speedy relief.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pree v. Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Retirement System

    363 Mo. 1131 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1953

    State v. Wipke et al., Mo. Sup., 133 S. W. 2d 354 ; State ex rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Smith, 342 Mo. 75 , 111 S. W. 2d 513 ; Holder v. Elms Hotel [688] Co., 338 Mo. 857 , 92 S. W. 2d 620 , 104 A.L.R. 339 . … Louis Public Service Co. v. Public Service Commission, 326 Mo. 1169 , 34 S. W. 2d 486 ; Holder v. Elms Hotel Co., 338 Mo. 857 , 92 S. W. 2d 620 , 104 A.L.R. 339 ; State ex rel. St. Louis Die Casting Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • St. Louis Police Officers' Ass'n v. Board of Police Commissioners

    846 S.W.2d 732 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1992

    Whether a contract entered into by the 1988 Board can bind future Boards is the question examined presently. 3 In Aslin v. … The trial court stated that Board’s interpretation completely ignores the language “shall henceforth pay.” In Jim Carlson Const., Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 4, 2022

    United States v. Brown, 499 F.3d 817 (8th Cir. 2007). I denied relief in this § 2255 case, ECF 23, 24, and the Court of Appeals denied a Certificate of Appealability, ECF 32. … IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Brown’s motion for ruling [85] is denied as moot.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • National Credit Union Administration Board v. Christenson

    627 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 3, 1986

    On June 6, 1984, Zionic was found to be insolvent and was placed into involuntary liquidation by the National Credit Union Administration Board (NCUAB) pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1766 (b) and 1787(a)(1). … See also Hanson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cantrell v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts

    26 S.W.3d 824 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2000

    If the board exceeded its jurisdiction to assess the discipline and if the board exceeded and violated its statutory authority, its acts are void ab initio. Cohen v. … State of Missouri, ex rel Marler v. State Board of Optometry, 898 S.W.2d 559, 563 (Mo.App.1994).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Huff v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Independence

    695 S.W.2d 166 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1985

    Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 434 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Mo.App.1968); and Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Frontenac, 672 S.W.2d 147, 150 (Mo.App.1984). … Nigro v. Kansas City, supra, 27 S.W.2d at 1032 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Jefferson City

    862 S.W.2d 338 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 28, 1993

    V, § 3. … In Campbell v.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Board of President of the St. Louis Public Schools v. Hammond

    21 Mo. 238 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1855

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 14, 2022

    United States v. Brown, No. 16-4130 (8th Cir.). In the supervised release revocation case appeal, Brown argued the sentence was in excess of that allowed by law. United States v. … United States v. Brown, No. 16-4130, Appellant’s Brief at 9.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Liddell v. Board of Educ. of City of St. Louis

    567 F. Supp. 1037 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 5, 1983

    Armstrong v. Board of School Directors, 616 F.2d 305, 312-14 (7th Cir.1980). … was created pursuant to state constitutional and statutory authority before the United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.

    116 F. 944 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Jul 5, 1902

    Ponder v. Cotton Co., 40 C. C. A. 416 , 100 Fed. 373 ; Irwin v. Williar, 110 U. S. 507 , 4 Sup. Ct. 160, 28 L. Ed. 225 ; Clews v. Jamieson, supra. … Bibb v. Allen, 149 U. S. 481 , 13 Sup. Ct. 950, 37 L. Ed. 819 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.