Case law

Crawford v. McConnell

173 Okla. 520 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1935

Hunt et al. v. W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co., 71 Okla. 193 , 176 P. 410 ; 13 C. J. 492; Clark v. Utah Const. Co. (Idaho) 8 P. (2d) 454 ; Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil Co. (Tex. Civ App.) 271 S. W. 145 . … See Board of County Commissioners of Okfuskee County v. Hazel wood, 79 Okla. 185 , 192 P. 217 , 11 A. L. R. 709, together with annotations in 11 A. L. R. beginning at page 713. .

Board of Trustees of the Full Gospel Temple v. City of Oklahoma City Ex Rel. Rauch

196 Okla. 491 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 19, 1946

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. … Brown, 186 Okla. 407 , 98 P. 2d 28 .

Scott v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n

313 P.3d 891 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 1, 2013

Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n, 2018 OK 85 , 308 P.3d 884 , Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary School Activities Ass'n, 2005 OK 88 , 125 P.3d 1219 , and Morgan v. … According to the Constitution of the Association, membership in the Association shall be open to public schools under the supervision and direction of district boards of education.

Joseph E. Seagrams & Sons, Inc. v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

637 P.2d 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 10, 1981

In Oliver v. Ok.ABC Board, Okl., 359 P.2d 183 (1961), the Court held that the Board did pot have the power or jurisdiction to fix or control the prices of alcoholic beverages at retail. … OABC Bd. v.

Franks v. City of Ponca City

170 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 18, 1934

. * * *” Uhr v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 191 S. W. 379 . … E. 657 ; Standard Oil Oo. v. Henry (Ind.) 133 N. E. 742 ; Bowlin v.

Payne County Ex Rel. v. Empire Petroleum Co.

104 Okla. 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

Brown as tax ferret. … Co. v. Porter, County Treasurer, 61 Okla. 171 , 160 Pac. 906 , where, it was said: “Under section 7449, Revised Laws of 1910, (section 9798, Comp.

Heisler v. Thomas

651 P.2d 1330 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1982

O’Rourke v. City of Tulsa, 457 P.2d 782 (Okla.1969); Cauvel v. City of Tulsa, 368 P.2d 660 (Okla.1962); Reaten v. Brown, 171 Okla. 38 , 45 P.2d 109 (1935). … Botchlett v. City of Bethany, 416 P.2d 613 (Okla.1966).

Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. Overton

491 P.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1971

In Continental Supply Co. v. … Brown & Sons v. Savage (1953), 208 Okl. 668 , 258 P.2d 183 . In that case Brown & Sons operated an oil and gasoline business in Oklahoma City and a feed and grain business in Enid, Oklahoma.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1952

V. … BOARD OF EDUCATION' — UNCONSTITUTIONAL `SEPARATE BUT EQUAL') CITE: 70 O.S.H. 4-22 (J. H. JOHNSON)

In Re the Purchase of the Suntide Inn Motel

563 P.2d 125 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 5, 1977

See also Bloomfield v. … Ramsey v. Leeper, 168 Okl. 43 , 31 P.2d 852 (1933); Brown v. Marker, 410 P.2d 61 (Okl.1965).

Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. King

76 Okla. 316 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 25, 1919

Buzbee, 42 Okla. 206 , 140 Pac. 1146 ; Morgan et al. v. Board of Comm’rs of Logan County, 59 Okla. 290 , 159 Pac. 514 . … Carr v. Thompson et al., 27 Okla. 7 , 110 Pac. 667 ; Foulds v. Hubbard, 36 Okla. 146 , 128 Pac. 108 ; St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Rickey, 33 Okla. 481 , 126 Pac. 735 ; Brown-Beane Co. et al. v.

In Re Application of Gruber

89 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1923

State v. Williams, 40 S. C. 373, 19 S. E. 5 ; State v. Brown, 14 S. C. 380; Caldwell v. State (Wyo.) 78 Pac. 496 . … In Howe v.

Gay Activists Alliance v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

638 P.2d 1116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 22, 1981

Pyeatte v. Board of Regents, 102 F.Supp. 407, 413 , (W.D.Okla.), aff’d 342 U.S. 936 , 72 S.Ct. 567 , 96 L.Ed. 696 (1952); Rheam v. Bd. of Regents, 161 Okla. 268 , 18 P.2d 535 (1933). … It is important to note at this point that for the purpose of the injunction, the Board of Regents, as a body corporate, can be enjoined. Gay Student Services v.

State Ex Rel. State Board of Education v. District Court of Bryan County

290 P.2d 413 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1955

See, for instance, Cecil v. Superior Ct. In and For Los Angeles Co., 59 Cal.App.2d 793 , 140 P.2d 125 ; Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Public Service Comm., 111 Mont. 78 , 107 P.2d 533 ; State Appeal Board v. … See Huerter v. Hassig, 175 Kan. 781 , 267 P.2d 532 , and the cases therein cited; Gresty v. Darby, 146 Kan. 63 , 68 P.2d 649 ; City of Coffeyville v. Wells, 137 Kan. 384 , 20 P.2d 477 ; State Appeal Board v.

MOORE v. WARR ACRES NURSING CENTER, LLC.

2016 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 2016

Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Company of Vinita , 1993 OK 117, ¶7, 860 P.2d 230. 9 Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Company of Vinita , see note 8, supra. 10 Brown v. … Browning-Ferris, Inc. Discussed 1993 OK 117, 860 P.2d 230, 64 OBJ 2882, Brown v. Oklahoma State Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita Discussed 2001 OK 52, 29 P.3d 543, 72 OBJ 1933, CLINTON v. STATE ex. rel.

Bd. of Directors of Harper Twp. v. Bd. of Com'rs.

134 Okla. 118 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1928

Thte trial court granted and issued its peremptory writ of mandamus to compel compliance on thle part of the township board. The township board superseded the judgment and perfected its appeal. … The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions to dismiss the application undter the authority of Hudgins v. Foster, 131 Okla. 90 , 267 Pac. 645 .

Greenwood v. Wilkinson

124 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1927

See, also, Hyde v. Ishmael, 42 Okla. 279 , 143 Pac. 1044 ; State ex rel. v. Brown, 92 Okla. 137 , 218 Pac. 816 ; Storm v. Garnet, 99 Okla 284, 227 Pac. 417 , and Foster v. Vickery, 111 Okla. 231 , 239 Pac. 141 . … Brown, supra, it was said: “Reasonable time means so much time as is necessary under th'e circumstances to do conveniently what the contract oor duty required should be done in a particular case.” In Foster v.

Opinion No. 71-105 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1971

In answer to your first question, it is clear that each elector in a School Board Election is required to be registered with the County Election Board. … Brown v. State Election Board, Okla., 369 P.2d 140 .

Board of Com'rs of Sequoyah County v. Oklahoma Creosoted Lbr. & Piling Co.

181 Okla. 561 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 25, 1938

Board of Com’rs of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 P. 215 ; Fairbanks Co. v. City of Sulphur, 62 Okla. 10 , 161 P. 811 ; Consolidated School District No. 2 v. Arlington School Supply Co., 148 Okla. 299 , 298 P. 1052 . … In City of Sulphur v. State ex rel.

Board of Trustees of the Fireman's Relief & Pension Fund v. Thomas

105 Okla. 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1924

Upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469 , 106 Pac. 957 , the cause is reversed and remanded for new trial for failure of defendant in error to comply with Rule 7 of this court. By the Court: Tt is^so ordered.