Case law

Plunkett v. Board of Pension Commissioners

114 N.J.L. 273 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 10, 1935

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

40 N.J.L. 595 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1878

Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, ante p. 64. Section seven of the act of 1870 gives rise to the contention in this case. … State v. Clarke, 1 Dutcher 54; Cross v. Morristown, 3 C. E. Green 305; State, Taintor, pros., v. Morristown, 4 Vroom 58 .

Lee v. Board of Township Committee

42 N.J.L. 543 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1880

Cecil v. Brigges, 2 T. … In Cunnack v. Gundry, 1 Chit.

Almindie v. Board of Excise Commissioners

73 N.J.L. 464 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 11, 1906

We are asked to allow a writ of certiorari for the purpose of reviewing a complaint that has been made in writing, under oath, against the applicant, Almindie, charging him with violation of an ordinance of the board of excise … State, Elder, pros., v. District Medical Society, 6 Vroom 200; State, Hoxsey, pros., v. Paterson, 10 Id. 489, 493; Drake v. Plume, 15 Id. 362; Farrow v. Springer, 28 Id. 353; Unger v. Fanwood, 40 Id. 548.

Cavanagh v. Board of Police Commissioners

59 N.J.L. 412 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1896

In Devault v. Mayor of Camden, 19 Vroom 434 , in this court, Mr. … Devault v. Mayor of Camden, 19 Vroom 433 ; Ayers v. Newark, 20 Id. 170; Ackerly v. Jersey City, 25 Id. 310.

Herman & Co. v. Board of Adjustment

3 N.J. Misc. 1233 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 10, 1925

Upon the refusal of the board of adjustment to grant the permit a writ of certiorari was applied for and allowed to review the action of the board of adjustment. … This ease canont be differentiated from the ease of Stein-berg v. Bigelow, Superintendent of Buildings, et al., in which an opinion will be filed at the same time as the opinion in .this case.

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

5 N.J. Misc. 153 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927

The board of chosen freeholders refused to pay the relator’s salary on the ground that the act Pamph. L. 1926, p. 411, had repealed the act Pamph. L. 1922, p. 403. … That it may be exscinded from the act without destroying it seems clear to us under our decisions, such as Johnson v. State, 59 N. J. L. 535; Iowa Life Insurance Co. v. Eastern Mutual Life Insurance Co., 64 Id. 340.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Hopkins

98 N.J.L. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1923

The purpose of the present proceeding is to compel the county clerk of Sussex county to account to the board of freeholders for certain fees received by him during his term of office.

Godfrey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

89 N.J.L. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1917

Armitage v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 86 N. J. L. 5. … Armitage v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, supra. Section 33 of the Crimes act (Comp.

Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of Education

163 N.J. 14 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1999

Judge Skillman concluded that this Court’s affirmance of Abbamont v. … Having so recently addressed in Cavuoti v.

Dobron v. Board of Trustees

271 N.J. Super. 506 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1994

Adams was fifty-five years of age when he applied for a service retirement allowance which was granted after a consideration by the pension board of the eleven-factor balancing test articulated in Uricoli v. … We disagree and accordingly we affirm the decision of the PFRS Board of Trustees.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Lindsley

41 N.J. Eq. 189 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

Van Fleet, V. C. This suit was commenced by bill of interpleader. On the 13th of August, 1881, Frederick "W. … In Shannon v.

Masters v. Union Beach Planning Board

85 N.J. 503 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 26, 1981

Thourot v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

16 N.J. Super. 347 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 16, 1951

See Vanderbach v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, 133 N. J. L. 126, at 130 (E. & A. 1945). … See Vanderbach v. Hudson County Board of Taxation, supra. If, after a proper hearing, he were found guilty of the charges, it would then be the duty of the board of freeholders to remove him at once.

Shanahan v. State Board of Education

68 N.J. 161 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 4, 1975

Plantation Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board

43 N.J. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1964

Rothberg Bros. v. Board of Commissioners

4 N.J. Misc. 872 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 21, 1926

Under Ignaciunas v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389, and other cases, relator is entitled to relief, and the rule to show cause will be made absolute and a peremptory writ of mandamus issue.

Erie Railroad v. Board of Commissioners

2 N.J. Misc. 220 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 12, 1924

Erie Railroad Co. v. Paterson, 72 N. J. L. 83; Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. Jersey City, 81 Id. 290; New York Bay Railroad Co. v. Newark, 82 Id. 591; Erie Railroad Co. v. Newark, 93 Id. 90. … We think no such benefit accrued to the lands in question, and if any did, then, as was said in Erie Railroad Co. v.

State v. Essex Public Road Board

37 N.J.L. 335 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1875

The State v. Hudson City, 5 Dutcher 115; The State v. Water Commissioners, 1 Vroom 247 ; The State, Hampson, pros., v. Mayor, &c., of Paterson, 7 Vroom 159 . … In The State, Kilburn, pros., v.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

60 N.J.L. 362 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1897

This certiorari brings up the following resolutions adopted by the board of chosen freeholders of Hudson county on December 17th, 1896 : “Resolved, That there shall be but one standing committee of this board, which committee … , to each one of which the board itself would refer all matters of similar nature—is evident from the “rules and by-laws” adopted by the board at the same meeting for its own government.