Case law

Dwayne Ballinger, Jr. v. John Prelesnik

709 F.3d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 2013

In arguing that the Michigan courts did not decide his claim on the merits and, thus, that the limitations of § 2254(d) do not apply, Ballinger relies on our pre- Harrington decision in Brown v. … To the extent that Brown is inconsistent with Harrington’s definition of “on the merits,” however, it is no longer the law. See Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

209 So. 2d 622 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1968

BRADY, Justice: The issues in this case are governed completely by the decisions in the following cases: Towles v. Towles, 243 Miss. 59 , 137 So.2d 182 (1962) ; Kincaid v. … Kincaid, 213 Miss. 451 , 57 So.2d 263 (1952); De Marco v. De Marco, 199 Miss. 165 , 24 So.2d 358 (1946); Moore v. Moore, 163 Miss. 15 , 140 So. 526 (1932) ; and Ramsay v.

Brown v. Brown

209 A.D. 835 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1924

In so far as concerns what the Court of Appeals in Harding v. Harding ( 236 N. Y. 514 , affg. 203 App.

O'CONNOR v. City of Rockford

52 Ill. 2d 360 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1972

Apparently, in adopting Rule 2.01 the Department of Public Health was cognizant of our decision in Heft v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 31 Ill.2d 266 . … In City of Des Plaines v. Metropolitan San.

In Re Stembridge

287 B.R. 658 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 9, 2002

Corp. v. … Reading Co. v. Brown, 391 U.S. 471 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968). In Reading, it was alleged (and ultimately held by the Court) that a post-petition tort could give rise to an administrative expense claim.

Speight v. United States

671 A.2d 442 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 1996

See Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021, 1022 (D.C.1991); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991). … See Brown, 590 A.2d at 1015 .

Chemaik v. Brown

364 Or. 849 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 2019

Chambers v. United States

417 F.3d 1218 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 1, 2005

Real v. … .” 906 F.2d at 1560 (citing Miller v.

Miller v. Smith

431 F. Supp. 821 · District Court, N.D. Texas · May 11, 1977

As the opinion in Monroe v. … See, for example, Ortiz v. LaVallee, 442 F.2d 912 (2nd Cir., 1971) and Ney v. State of California, 439 F.2d 1285 (9th Cir., 1971). 16 . Knowles v. Carson, 419 F.2d 369, 371 (5th Cir., 1969). 17 . Jones v.

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Martinez

68 N.M. 271 · New Mexico Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1961

State v. … Riddle v. Brown (1852) 20 Ala. 412 , 56 Am.Dec. 202, 9 Mor.Min.Rep. 219; Riffel v. Letts (1916) 31 Cal.App. 426 , 160 Pac. 845 ; McLean v. Colf (1918) 179 Cal. 237 , 176 Pac. 169 ; Wharton v.

Cates v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

9 So. 3d 617 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 1, 2009

9 So.3d 617 (2009) CATES v. BROWN & BROWN, INC. No. 1D08-2468. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 1, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Flagg

11 So. 3d 946 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 24, 2009

11 So.3d 946 (2009) BROWN & BROWN, INC. v. FLAGG. No. 2D08-2917. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 24, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

Brown v. Brown

146 N.Y.S. 1085 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 1914

Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown

195 Pa. Super. 324 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1961

In Commonwealth v. … The statute was never intended to constitute a court a sounding board for domestic financial disagreements, nor a board of arbitration to determine the extent to which a husband is required to recognize the budget *329 suggested

Brown v. Brown (In Re Brown)

36 B.R. 103 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Mar 29, 1983

Matter of Steingesser, 602 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1979); Poolman v. Poolman, 289 F.2d 332 (8th Cir.1961); 2. Whether there was a wide disparity in the parties’ incomes. Matter of Woods, 561 F.2d 27 (7th Cir.1977); and 3. … Nitz v. Nitz, 568 F.2d 148 (10th Cir.1977). Here the Court finds that extrinsic evidence should be considered because the Browns’ intent cannot be gleaned from the divorce decree alone.

State v. Brown

99 N.E.3d 1135 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2017

[Cite as State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio-8416.] … Florida v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.

768 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, D. Colorado · Mar 3, 2011

Issues relating to the contamination have been discussed at board meetings open to the public, and La Plata has talked to adjacent landowners. … (R & M) v.

Wilkinson v. Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama

102 So. 3d 368 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 25, 2012

In Vaughan v. … In Lee v.

John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 16 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 31, 2006

See Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc). … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 389, 396 (1996) (quoting Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962) (quoting Mastro Plastics Corp. v.

Brown v. State ex rel. Brown

44 Ind. 222 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1873

Price v. The Grand Rapids, etc., R. R. Co., 13 Ind. 58 ; Kiser v. The State, 13 Ind. 80 ; Hillis v. Wilson, 13 Ind. 146 ; The Peoria, etc., Insurance Co. v. Walser, 22 Ind. 73 ; Holdridge v. … Sweet, 23 Ind. 118 ; Sayres v. Linkhart, 25 Ind. 145 ; Nelson v. Myers, 34 Ind. 431 ; Prince v. The State, ex rel. Sage, 42 Ind. 315 .