Case law

Bell v. Safety Grooving & Grinding, LP

107 F. App'x 607 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 24, 2004

In Tetro v. … And in Johnson v.

Marriage of Brown v. Brown

363 N.W.2d 60 · Court of Appeals of Minnesota · Feb 12, 1985

FACTS Appellant Susan Brown and respondent David Brown were married on April 10, *61 1970. The parties’ son, Justin Brown, was born on December 16, 1972. … Nice-Petersen v. Nice-Petersen, 310 N.W.2d 471, 472 (Minn.1981).

Brown v. Brown (In Re Brown)

46 B.R. 612 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 19, 1985

This matter came on for trial on 7 November 1984 upon the complaint of Charma Lee Brown (hereinafter Charma) filed 23 January 1981 and the Answer of Defendant, John Weldon Brown (hereinafter John) filed 16 March 1981. … Gerdes, 33 B.R. 860 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); In Re Jacobs, 83-0720 (at Dayton, 1984, unreported); Lincoln v. Phillips, 31 B.R. 398 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); Van Hoose v. Van Hoose, 31 B.R. 332 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); Castle v.

John R. Ramsey Et Al. v. R. James Nicholson

20 Vet. App. 16 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Mar 31, 2006

See Butts v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 532, 539 (1993) (en banc). … Brown, 9 Vet.App. 389, 396 (1996) (quoting Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 585 , 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962) (quoting Mastro Plastics Corp. v.

Brown v. Brown

97 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 1950

The attorneys who represented the plaintiff in her lifetime oppose said motion allegedly as her attorneys despite her death, and they have also filed a motion for. leave to intervene on behalf of Doris Brown Wesley who asserts

State v. Eastmond

129 Wash. 2d 497 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1996

State v. Miller, 71 Wn.2d 143, 146 , 426 P.2d 986 (1967); State v. Karp, 69 Wn. App. 369, 374-75 , 848 P.2d 1304 , review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1005 (1993); State v. Murphy, 7 Wn. … State v. Johnson, 100 Wn.2d 607, 623 , 674 P.2d 145 (1983), overruled on other grounds by State v. Bergeron, 105 Wn.2d 1 , 711 P.2d 1000 (1985); State v. McCullum, 98 Wn.2d 484, 487-88 , 656 P.2d 1064 (1983); State v.

Barna v. United States

127 Fed. Cl. 253 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2016

So long as the Board considered the relevant evidence and came to a reasonable conclusion, this court will not disturb the Board's decision.” Riser v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 679, 683–84 (2011) (quoting Heisig v. … The court does not sit as “a super correction board.” Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. at 331, 594 F.2d at 830; see also Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed. Cir.)

Brown v. Brown

86 Misc. 71 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1976

In the event I find I do not have jurisdiction I must refuse to proceed further and dismiss the action (Robinson v Oceanic Steam Nav. Co., supra; Cavallo v Cavallo, supra). … The court’s jurisdiction in matrimonial actions is wholly statutory, the applicable statute being section 230 of the Domestic Relations Law (Eckert v Eckert, 34 AD2d 684 ; Cocron v Cocron, 84 Misc 2d 335, 341 ).

In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust Litigation

456 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 2006

(quoting Weese v. … Servs., Inc. v.

Brown v. Brown

63 Misc. 110 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1909

South wick v. Southwick, 49 N. Y. 510; Matter of Davis, 149 id. 539 ; Matter of Ludlow St., 59 App. Div. 180 ; Hartmann v. Hoffman, 76 id. 449; Peace v. Wilson, 186 N. Y. 403 , and cases there cited.

Commonwealth v. Brown

196 A.3d 130 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2018

Brown's Brief at 90. Citing to Griffin v. … Brown's Brief at 90. Similarly, Brown relies upon Lesko v. Lehman , 925 F.2d 1527 (3d Cir. 1991), cert. denied , Lehman v.

Brown v. Brown

379 So. 2d 1101 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 28, 1980

In re Karen Townsend Brown, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *1102 Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Ouachita. 377 So.2d 438 . Granted.

Brown v. Brown

261 La. 1067 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 25, 1972

In re: Ronald Brown applying for cer-tiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 260 So.2d 66 . Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

DESHORN D. BROWN v. RACHAEL BROWN

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 18, 2021

BROWN, Appellant, v. RACHAEL BROWN, Appellee.

BROWN AND BROWN, INC. v. Blumenthal

288 Conn. 646 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Sep 9, 2008

This appeal arises from an action seeking injunctive, declaratory and equitable relief brought by the plaintiff, Brown and Brown, Inc., against the defendant, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, in connection with a subpoena … For purposes of convenience, references herein to the plaintiff are to Brown and Brown, Inc., and references to the defendant are to Attorney General Richard Blumenthal.

Brown v. Brown

446 So. 2d 258 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 8, 1984

. *259 The appellee concedes that the above proviso contravenes this court’s recent decision in Keenan v. Keenan, 440 So.2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

David E. Roth, for Himself and for All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Regents of State Colleges and Roger E. Guiles

446 F.2d 806 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 1, 1971

In Goldberg v. … Coahoma County Board of Education (N.D.Miss., 1963), 246 F.Supp. 517, 521 , aff’d 5th Cir., 353 F.2d 648 , cert. den. 384 U.S. 962 , 86 S.Ct. 1586 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 ; Hopkins v.

County of Cook v. John Sexton Contractors Co.

75 Ill. 2d 494 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1979

and (2) Are Board Rules 503(a) and 205(j) valid? Both of these questions have been decided adversely to the Board and the Village by this court’s recent decision in Landfill, Inc. v. … (Town of Cicero v. Fox Valley Trotting Club, Inc. (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 10, 18 ; Stryker v. Village of Oak Park (1976), 62 Ill. 2d 523, 527 ; Paglini v. Police Board (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 233, 235 ; Mulligan v.

Dwayne Ballinger, Jr. v. John Prelesnik

709 F.3d 558 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 4, 2013

In arguing that the Michigan courts did not decide his claim on the merits and, thus, that the limitations of § 2254(d) do not apply, Ballinger relies on our pre- Harrington decision in Brown v. … To the extent that Brown is inconsistent with Harrington’s definition of “on the merits,” however, it is no longer the law. See Brown v.

Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal Commission

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 30 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2005

In Brown v. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 15 Cal.3d 52, 56 .) In Brown , no separation of powers issue was raised or decided.