Case law

Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry

192 Or. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2004

Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 189 Or App 531, 550 , 76 P3d 1148 (2003). … v.

Labor Force v. Frierson

169 Or. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 2000

Roseburg Forest Products v. … Brown, 159 Or App 440, 445-46 , 978 P2d 407 (1999); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Beck v. City of Portland

202 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 2005

Mark v. … Second, the Supreme Court’s analysis of the ripeness question in US West Communications applied the test for ripeness set out in Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982), and Cummings Constr. v.

Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition v. Board of County Com'rs of Clatsop County

351 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2012

273 P.3d 135 (2012) 351 Or. 541 OREGON SHORES CONSERVATION COALITION v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF CLATSOP COUNTY. No. (S059579). Supreme Court of Oregon. January 12, 2012. Petition for Review Allowed. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Friends of Yamhill v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or. 219 , 264 P.3d 1265 (2011).

Trademark Construction, Inc. v. Marion County Board of Commissioners

155 Or. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1998

Derry v. Douglas County, 132 Or App 386 , 888 P2d 588 (1995). … Assoc. v.

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 15, 2025

BROWN, Case No. 3:22-cv-01202-JR Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA … Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S.

Astoria Marine Iron Works v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

270 F. 635 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 1921

The motion to remand will be denied on the authority of Rosenberg Iron & Metal Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (recently decided by this court) 271 Fed. 956 . … Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. U. S. Shipping Board (D. C.) 268 Fed. 624 . Neither United States v. Strang et al., 254 U. S. -, 41 Sup. Ct. 165, 65 L. Ed. -; nor Salas v. United States, 234 Fed. 842 , 148 C. C.

Culbertson v. Board of Parole

336 Or. App. 630 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 2024

CULBERTSON, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … In Thomsen v.

Union High School District No. 1 v. Linn County District Boundary Board

244 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1966

Oregon Constitution, Article VIII, § 3; Padberg, West et al v. Martin et al, 225 Or 135 , 357 P2d 255 (1960); School District No. 68 v. Hoskins et al, 194 Or 301 , 240 P2d 949 (1952); Campbell v. … “(d) Is not likely to adversely affect any contemplated reorganization under ORS 330.505 to 330.780.” *217 We held in School Dist. 7 v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Harris

334 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 2002

Stevenson v. Holzman, 254 Or 94, 104 , 458 P2d 414 (1969). Further, in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … . *364 Citing Lassiter v.

Schuening v. J.R. Simplot & Co.

84 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 8, 1987

See, e.g., Brown v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 52 Or App 191 , 627 P2d 1291 (1981). 2 The referee stated that Graham’s report supported *626 the finding that claimant was medically stationary at the time of closure. … Mazama Plywood Co. v. Beattie, 62 Or App 355 , 661 P2d 109 (1983). 2 But see Martin v.

Jones v. Polk County

36 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1900

In State v. … In Brown v.

State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. Consumer Sounding Board, Inc.

114 Or. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1992

The court balanced defendant’s right to retain counsel of her choice against the state’s need to conclude the case in a timely manner, see State v. … See Oregon State Bar v. Gilchrist, 272 Or 552 , 538 P2d 913 (1975). The court did not err in holding her in contempt. Affirmed. This case is subject to the contempt laws before the 1991 amendments.

Jones v. Thompson

156 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1998

Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978); see also Payton v. … Also, our decision in Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 140 Or App 415 , 915 P2d 467 (1996), is instructive on the issue of mootness.

Butte Creek School District No. 67J v. Clackamas County District Boundary Board

88 Or. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1987

Here, Clackamas Board’s order became final on September 9, when Marion Board concurred. See Central School (Beaman I) v. Marion District (A42081), 88 Or App 85 , 744 P2d 284 (1987). … In this case, the letter of State Board, in conjunction with the documents attached to the petition for judicial review, might constitute a final order of State Board. See Standard Ins. Co. v.

Slater v. SAIF Corp.

287 Or. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 2017

Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 250 , 391 P3d 773 (2017). … Brown, 361 Or at 272-73 .

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 19, 2024

Corso v. Colvin, 2014 WL 950029, *10 (D. Or. Mar. 11, 2014); see also Johnson v. … Febach v.

SAIF Corp. v. Severson

105 Or. App. 67 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1990

Our standard of review is explained in Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988): “Whether a denial or delay is unreasonable involves both legal and factual questions. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); see also Williams v. SAIF, 31 Or App 1301, 1305 , 572 P2d 658 (1977).” The Board did apply the correct legal standard.

Haas v. Hathaway

144 Or. App. 478 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1996

Brown v. Cupp, 31 Or App 1237, 1241 , 572 P2d 1065 (1977). … Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288, 292 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991).

Cook v. Zenon

107 Or. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1991

Plaintiff does not allege facts that show a “further imprisonment or restraint” under the first category in Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). Jones v. … See Miller v. Maass, 95 Or App 445, 447 , 769 P2d 788 (1989). *29 As to the other category of Penrod/Brown , plaintiff does not allege facts that, if true, require immediate judicial scrutiny.