Case law

Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of Horbart v. School Dist. No. 56

35 Okla. 506 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 10, 1913

See Ray v. School District, 21 Okla. 88 , 95 Pac. 480 ; School District No. 80 v. Brown et al., 2 Kan. App. 309 , 43 Pac. 102 ; Kellogg v. School District, 13 Okla. 285 , 74 Pac. 110 ; section 6154, Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. … Deming Investment Co. v. Love, 31 Okla. 146 , 120 Pac. 635 ; Bohart v. Matthews, 29 Okla. 315 , 116 Pac. 944 ; Bretch Bros. v. Winston & Sons, 28 Okla. 625 , 115 Pac. 795 ; Alcorn et al. v.

Central Coal & Lumber Co. v. Board of Equalization of Le Flore County

70 Okla. 131 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1918

The plaintiff appeared before the equalization board at the session at which the assessment was raised for the purpose of having the action of the board vacated an'd set aside. … The board refused to vacate its order raising the assessed valuation as returned by the assessor, and the plaintiff then filed a written protest and a petition against the action of the board, and the board then refused to

School Dist. No. 268 v. Board of Ed. City of Devol

129 Okla. 94 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1928

MASON, V. C. J. … district and suggested that they take an appeal to the board of county commissioners; that she prepared tiie appeal, which was signed by said members, and later filed with the board of county commissioners, wbo acted on

Hoover Equipment Co. v. Board of Tax Roll Corrections of Adair County

436 P.2d 645 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1967

City of Tulsa v. Mayes, County Treasurer, et al., (1935), 174 Okl. 286 , 51 P.2d 266 ; City of Hartshorne et al. v. Dickinson, (1952), 207 Okl. 305 , 249 P.2d 422 ; Sublett v. … General Electric Credit Corp. v. Andreen, (1958), 74 Nev. 199 326 P.2d 731 . and see also Bowls v. Oklahoma City et al., (1909), 24 Okl. 579 , 104 P. 902 ; Carroll v.

Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. No. 93 v. Dixson

202 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1949

See Rorick v. Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District, 57 F. 2d 1048 , and decisions therein cited; California Highway Commission v. Ballard, 77 Cal. App. 404 , 247 P. 527 ; State ex rel. Urquhart v. … Johnson, 107 Fla. 624 , 145 So. 880 ; Reppel v. Board of Liquidation 11 F. Supp. 799 .

Gurney v. Ferguson

190 Okla. 254 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1941

Our conclusion here is fully supported by the reasoning and conclusion in Judd et al. v. Board of Education et al., supra. … Traub v. Brown, 6 Harr. (Del.) 181, 172 Atl. 835 ; Synod of Dakota v. State, 2 S. D. 366, 50 N. W. 632 ; State ex rel. Van Straten v. Milquet, School Treas., 180 Wis. 109 , 192 N. W. 392 ; Williams et al. v.

OKLAHOMA ex rel. STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS v. ALVARADO

2025 OK 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 2025

STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS v. … STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS, Complainant, v. JAZMIN C. ALVARADO, Respondent.

Bottles v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision

67 O.B.A.J. 1598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 7, 1996

The Board argues in the alternative the proper standard of proof is a preponderance of the evidence. Generally, this Court will not address an issue not raised in the tribunal below. Pettit v. … We recently addressed this issue in Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists of the State of Oklahoma, 913 P.2d 1339 (Olda.1996).

Protest of Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. Excise Board of Bryan County

181 Okla. 229 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1937

Co. v. … See O’Neil Engineering Co. v. Town of Ryan, 32 Okla. 738 , 124 P. 19 ; Flood v. Town of Shidler, 127 Okla. 148 . 260 P. 52 ; Cobb v. City of Norman, 179 Okla. 126 . 64 P. (2d) 901 , and cases cited therein.

Board of County Commissioners of the County of Seminole v. Hutchison

400 P.2d 176 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1965

Plaintiff relies solely on Board of County Com’rs of Oklahoma County v. Litton, Okl., 315 P.2d 239 , 64 A.L.R.2d 1365 . … Thus, this case, on principle, is more analogous to City of Tulsa v. Parrish, Okl., 333 P.2d 564 , and State ex rel. Livingston v. Maxwell, Okl., 353 P.2d 690 .

Uhls v. Midwest Oil Corporation

521 P.2d 1370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 27, 1974

In McGrath v. Brown, 190 Okl. 144 , 120 P.2d 624 , we held: “Under * * * 11 Okla.Stat.Ann. … In City of Oklahoma City v.

Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Cotton

196 Okla. 545 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1946

In Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Marietta v. … In Stephenson, Chairman, v.

Chidsey v. Ellis

31 Okla. 107 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

The rule is stated by the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma in the case of Berry et al. v. … Casper et al., 13 Okla. 335 , 73 Pac. 1102 ; Rogers v. Brown, 15 Okla. 524 , 86 Pac. 443 ; Carle et al. v. Oklahoma Woolen Mills et *109 al., 16 Okla. 515 , 86 Pac. 66 ; Board of Com’rs of Garfield County v.

Allright Parking System, Inc. v. County Board of Equalization of Tulsa County

375 P.2d 891 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1962

After its protest to said increase was heard before the County Board of Equalization, and denied by that body, complainant appealed the Board’s ruling by filing an initial pleading entitled “Complaint” in the District Court … Co. v. Board of Equalization, 184 Okl. 525 , 88 P. 2d 626, 627 , cited by complainant).

Excise Board of Le Flore County v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.

173 Okla. 238 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

Board of Education, 98 Okla. 237 , 224 P. 712 ; Threadgill v. Peterson, 95 Okla. 187 , 219 P. 389 ; Wood v. Phillips, 95 Okla, 255, 219 P. 646 ; Myers v. Independent School District, 104 Okla. 51 , 230 P. 498 ; Eaton v. … Co., 122 Okla. 143 , 251 P. 1032 ; Board of Commissioners v.

Taylor v. Trow

191 Okla. 485 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 17, 1942

It would not have been void if it had named no person as chairman of the board. Hefner v. Cravens, 189 Okla. 558 , 118 P. 2d 652 . … Plaintiff relies upon Brown v.

Board of Com'rs of Carter Cty. v. Sch. Dist. No. 34

135 Okla. 249 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1928

This cause is reversed upon authority of cause No. 18274 (Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. School Dist. No. 71, of Carter County), 135 Okla. 248 , 275 Pac. 302 , this day decided.

Loveless Et Ux. v. State

43 Okla. Crim. 146 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 18, 1929

In Duncan v. State, 11 Okla. … In Duncan v.

Logan v. Young

121 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1926

Plaintiff cites the following cases: People v. McClellan, 191 N. Y. 341 , 84 N. E. 68 ; Snowden v. Flannery (Ky.) 167 S. W. 893 ; Gant v. Brown (Mo.) 142 S. W. 422 . … In Quigley v.

City of Wilburton v. King

162 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1933

In the case of Uhr v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 191 S. … Both parties refer to the case of Sappington v. Board of Commissioners of Jefferson County, 134 Okla. 253 , 273 P. 274 .