Case law

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Hopkins

98 N.J.L. 301 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 3, 1923

The purpose of the present proceeding is to compel the county clerk of Sussex county to account to the board of freeholders for certain fees received by him during his term of office.

Godfrey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

89 N.J.L. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 24, 1917

Armitage v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, 86 N. J. L. 5. … Armitage v. Mayor, &c., of Newark, supra. Section 33 of the Crimes act (Comp.

Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of Education

163 N.J. 14 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 16, 1999

Judge Skillman concluded that this Court’s affirmance of Abbamont v. … Having so recently addressed in Cavuoti v.

Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Board of Review

397 N.J. Super. 309 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 31, 2007

PNI again appealed to the Board. On May 31, 2006, the Board issued its final decision affirming the Appeal Tribunal’s determination. … Campbell v. Dep’t of Civil Serv., 39 N.J. 556, 562 , 189 A.2d 712 (1963); State-Operated Sch. Dist. of Newark v.

Hennessy v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

91 N.J.L. 693 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1917

Borger v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

13 N.J. Misc. 676 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 21, 1935

On December. 12th, 1934, the board of chosen freeholders of Bergen county passed a resolution permitting the keepers employed in the Bergen county jail to participate in the benefits of a pension fund erected under the authority … Regan v. State Board of Education, 109 N. J. L. 1; 159 Atl. Rep. 691 ; Monahan v. Matthews, 91 N. J. L. 123; 103 Atl. Rep. 40 ; Citizens' Gas Light Co. v. Alden, 44 N. J. L. 648.

Randolph v. City of Brigantine Planning Board

405 N.J. Super. 215 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2009

Shapiro v. … See Kruvant v.

Meeting House Plaza Associates v. Planning Board

122 N.J. 406 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 16, 1990

Maxfield v. Board of Education

106 N.J. 538 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 4, 1987

It tolerates the State Board of Education’s refusal to obey the Appellate Division’s mandate in this case, accepting instead the State Board’s contention that our decision in Rutherford Education Association v. … Rutherford Board of Education, 99 N.J. 8 (1985), constituted an intervening change in the law. That contention simply does not withstand close scrutiny. In Spiewak v.

DeFlesco v. Mercer County Board of Elections

43 N.J. Super. 492 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 30, 1957

State v. McCall, 14 N.J. 538, 545 (1954); Abbotts Dairies v. Armstrong, 14 N.J. 319, 325 (1954); Julius Roehrs Co. v. Division of Tax Appeals, 16 N.J. 493, 497 (1954); Jamouneau v. Harner, 16 N.J. 500, 513 (1954). … See recent opinion of public interest rendered by the Supreme Court of Rhode Island in Roberts v. Board of Elections, 129 A. 2 d 330 (1957).

Wolcott v. Overbrook Regional Board of Education

122 N.J. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 1, 1990

Virtue v. Board of Freeholders of Essex

67 N.J.L. 139 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1901

Justice Cole, in State v. … We have not overlooked the fact that in a number of cases decided in this state (State v. Layton, 4 Dutcher 244; McDonald v. Vermilye, 10 Troom 282; Sweeney v. Stevens, 17 Id. 344; Daubman v.

U-Haul Co. v. Board of Adjustment

118 N.J. 212 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 31, 1989

McCallum v. County Board of Assessors

58 N.J.L. 544 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1896

A comparison between what a board of assessors may lawfully do to increase the value of the prop *545 erty contained in any assessors’ duplicate and what was done by the defendants in this record, will disclose the nature … Trask v. Carragan, 8 Vroom 264 ; Weehawken v. Roe, 7 Id. 86; West Hoboken v. Anderson, 9 Id. 173, 175; Clark Thread Co. v. Kearny Township, 26 Id. 50. The motion to quash the allocatur rests upon no apparent foundation.

Palitto v. Board of Review

312 N.J. Super. 157 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1998

Claimant Karen Palitto appeals from a determination of the Appeal Tribunal, affirmed by the Board of Review, denying her application for disability benefits on the ground that since she was employed by her husband, her employment … The Appeal Tribunal and Board of Review construed that exclusion as absolute and unconditional. It is neither.

Kosmin v. New Jersey State Parole Board

363 N.J. Super. 28 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 2003

See, e.g., Petrusky v. Maxfli Dunlop Sports, 342 N.J.Super. 77, 81 , 775 A.2d 723, 725-26 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 170 N.J. 388 , 788 A.2d 772 (2001); Weir v. … In reaching such determination, the board panel or board shall state on the record the reasons therefor. [Footnotes deleted.] See also Trantino v. N.J.

Smith v. Township of Chester Planning Board

113 N.J. 383 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1988

Bamburgh v. Board of Review

48 N.J. Super. 472 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 21, 1958

The claimant thereupon appealed to the Board of Review which also held that the appeal to the Appeal Tribunal had been out of time. However, one member of the Board dissented, relying on Borgia v. Board of Review, 21 N. … Borgia v. Board of Review, 21 N. J. Super. 462 (App. Div. 1952), supra (commented on in 8 Rutgers L. Rev. 232 (1952)), is not to the contrary.

Newman v. New Jersey State Parole Board

111 N.J. 566 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 10, 1988

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Lindsley

41 N.J. Eq. 189 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Feb 15, 1886

Van Fleet, V. C. This suit was commenced by bill of interpleader. On the 13th of August, 1881, Frederick "W. … In Shannon v.