Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.98s
Seipp v. Wake County Board of Education
132 N.C. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 1999
Wake County Board of Education (Board) appeals from the denial of its summary judgment motion. … Hill v. Smith, 38 N.C. App. 625, 626 , 248 S.E.2d 455, 456 (1978); Colombo v. Dorrity, 115 N.C. App. 81, 83 , 443 S.E.2d 752, 754 , disc. review denied, 337 N.C. 689 , 448 S.E.2d 517 (1994).
Cited 5 timesPublishedFearrington v. City of Greenville
Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 23, 2024
It would then invoice the Board for the actual costs -2- FEARRINGTON V. … The Board’s tacit refusal of plaintiffs’ -19- FEARRINGTON V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBizzell Ex Rel. Bizzell v. Board of Aldermen
192 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1926
*Page 350 That at a regular meeting of the board of aldermen, held in the city of Goldsboro on 17 July, 1924, the board of aldermen adopted the three ordinances, as follows: "Be it ordained by the board of aldermen of the … In S. v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedYoder v. Board of Commissioners
7 N.C. App. 712 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 1970
In Harris v. … See also Frazier v. Comrs., 194 N.C. 49 , 138 S.E. 433 (1927) and Harris v. Board of Commissioners, 1 N.C. App. 258, 161 S.E. 2d 213 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarris-Offut v. Nc Board of Lpc
360 N.C. 533 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGladrey & Pullen v. Board of Cpa ex.
360 N.C. 294 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 22, 2005
Defendant (Board of CPA Examiners) shall have up to and including the 27th day of January 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of December 2005."
Cited 0 timesPublishedWeber v. Buncombe County Board of Education
301 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 26, 1980
The Respondent Board of Education has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of a substantial constitutional question. … That court is directed to remand to the Superior Court, Buncombe County, which said court shall remand to the Buncombe County Board of Education to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by law.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHutchinson v. Board of Commissioners
172 N.C. 844 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 19, 1916
The decision in Foundry Co. v. Aluminum Co., ante, 702, is controlling- on the appeal in this action. … Snow v. Comrs., 112 N. C., 341 ; Hardware Co. v. Schools, 150 N. C., 680 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedHudson v. Board of Transportation
25 N.C. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 16, 1975
as a matter of law under an essentially identical provision in a right-of-way agreement that an adjoining property owner is not entitled to direct access to a ramp, Justice Moore, speaking for our Supreme Court, Abdalla v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLittle v. Anson County Board of Education
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 8, 2009
Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co. , 305 N.C. 593 , 290 S.E.2d 682 (1982). … Demery v. Perdue Farms, Inc. , 143 N.C. App. 259 , 545 S.E.2d 485 (2001); Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 , 425 S.E.2d 454 (1993). 4.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTucker v. State Board of Alcoholic Control
240 N.C. 177 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 28, 1954
Corey v. Hardison, 236 N.C. 147 , 72 S.E. 2d 416 ; Rodwell v. Harrison, 132 N.C. 45 , 43 S.E. 540 ; Van Amringe v. Taylor, 108 N.C. 196 , 12 S.E. 1005 , 12 L.R.A. 202 , 23 Am. S. R. 51 ; 18 Am. … S. v. Gradwell, R. I. & W. Va., 243 U.S. 476 , 37 S. Ct. 407 , 61 L. Ed. 857 ; U. S. v. O’Toole, 236 F. 993 ; State v. Bienstock, 78 N.J.L. 256 , 73 A. 530 . The argument is fallacious in other respects.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnion Bank of Richmond v. Board of Commissioners
116 N.C. 339 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1895
Currie v. Canady, 78 N. C., 91 ; Hayes v. Davidson, 70 N. C., 573 ; Mitchell v. Sawyer, 71 N. C., 70 ; Love v. Johnston, 72 N. C., 415 . … Norment v. Charlotte, 85 N. C., 387 ; Cain v. Commissioners, 86 N. C., 8 ; Southerland v. Goldsboro, 96 N. C., 49 ; Duke v. Brown, Ibid, 127; McDowell v. Construction Co., 96 N. C., 514 ; Rigsbee v. Durham, 98 N.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCarpenter v. Brewer Hendley Oil Co.
145 N.C. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2001
Perry v. Carolina Builders Corp., 128 N.C. App. 143, 146 , 493 S.E.2d 814, 816 (1997). … Town of Spencer v. Town of East Spencer, 351 N.C. 124, 127 , 522 S.E.2d 297, 300 (1999). A justiciable controversy exists when litigation to resolve the controversy between the parties appears to be unavoidable. Id. .
Cited 1 timesPublished230 N.C. 505 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1949
Grantham v. Nunn, 188 N.C. 239 , 124 S.E. 309 ; Owen v. Board of Education, 184 N.C. 267 , 114 S.E. 390 ; Sutton v. Sutton, 183 N.C. 128 , 110 S.E. 777 . … The presumption of correctness of the judgment entered below applies to cases of this kind, Plott v. Comsioners, 187 N.C. 125 , 121 S.E. 190 ; Hyatt v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSwann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
328 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 29, 1971
Smith v. St. Tammany Parish School Board, 302 F.Supp. 106 (E.D.La., 1969). … Brown II [Brown v. Board of Educa *1353 tion], 349 U.S. [294] at 300, 75 S.Ct. [753] at 756 [ 99 L.Ed. 1083 ].”
Cited 13 timesPublishedMcGladrey & Pullen v. Board of Cpa ex
629 S.E.2d 610 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 13, 2006
Cited 0 timesPublishedOliver v. Board of Commissioners
194 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 19, 1927
Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., 515 ; Houser v. Bonsal, 149 N. C., 51 . In R. R. v. Reid, 187 N. … See Phillipse v. Higdon, 44 N. C., 380 ; Foster v. Woodfin, 65 N. C., 29 ; Mayo v. Whitson, 47 N. C., 231 ; Kirkland v. Mangum, 50 N. C., 313 .”
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
882 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Apr 5, 1995
The entire warehouse became engulfed with flames, resulting in the destruction of tobacco products owned by the plaintiff Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. … Relying heavily on Williams v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLindsey v. First National Bank
115 N.C. 553 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1894
Cited 5 timesPublishedDeaton v. Board of Trustees of Elon College
226 N.C. 433 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1946
Highway Comm. v. Transportation Corp., supra; Gowing v. Henry Field Co., supra. … Rushing v. Utilities Co., supra; Perry v. Herrin, 225 N. C., 601 ; Benton v. Building Co., 223 N. C., 809 , 28 S. E. (2d), 491 ; Morrison v. Mills Co., 223 N. C., 387 , 26 S. E. (2d), 857 ; King v. Mills Co., 210 N.
Cited 29 timesPublished
Ask Donna