Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

0.67s

  • Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    539 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1976

    As this court held in Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Int’l v. … Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 290 , 261 F.2d 754 , 756 (1958), cert. denied, sub nom. Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 589 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Croskey v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

    596 A.2d 988 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 1991

    See Batty v. … Baumgartner v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2011

    Furthermore, the court owes deference in the Board’s choice of proceedings. See NLRB v. … In re Brown, 454 F.2d 999, 1007 (D.C. Cir. 1971).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Century Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    656 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 22, 1981

    656 F.2d 898 Century Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board 80-1668, 80-1684, 80-1685 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 5/22/81 1 C.A.B. AFFIRMED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roy v. U. S. Board of Parole

    559 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

    559 F.2d 188 181 U.S.App.D.C. 411 Roy v. U. S. Board of Parole No. 76-1600 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/24/77 1 D.C.D.C. VACATED AND REMANDED

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richards v. United States Merit Systems Protection Board

    739 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 1990

    As the court provided in Bartel v. … See also Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Rizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C.Cir.1983); Davis v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Betty Haufrecht v. Subversive Activities Control Board

    322 F.2d 403 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

    This is one of the cases to which we referred in Labor Youth League v. … See Walling v. James V. Reuter Co., 321 U.S. 671 , 64 S.Ct 826 , 88 L.Ed. 1001 (1944).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth Communications, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    312 F.3d 465 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 13, 2002

    Analysis This court owes no deference to the Board’s interpretation of a disputed collective bargaining agreement. BP Amoco Corp. v. NLRB, 217 F.3d 869, 873 (D.C.Cir.2000); Wilson & Sons Heating & Plumbing, Inc. v. … Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Postal Serv., 940 F.2d 704, 707-08 (D.C.Cir.1991); Appalachian Power Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 529 F.2d 342 , 347-48 (D.C.Cir.1976); News Union of Baltimore v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • British Caledonian Airways, Ltd. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    584 F.2d 982 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 15, 1978

    American President Lines v. … In Nader v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    285 F.3d 1073 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 2002

    We defer to the Board's interpretation of the Act if it is reasonable, see Holly Farms Corp. v. … support during the certification year, see Brooks v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • DiVincenzo v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief Board

    620 A.2d 868 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1993

    In Seabolt v. … In Wells v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Civil Aeronautics Board v. Air Transport Association of America

    201 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 1961

    This is a proceeding to enforce an administrative subpoena duces tecum issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board during the course of an investigation of defendant, a trade association of air carriers. … The Court is of the opinion that the attorney-client privilege may be asserted in the proceeding pending before the Civil Aeronautics Board and involved in this action.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Surface Transportation Board

    75 F.3d 696 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 16, 1996

    Cf Argento v. … Kungys v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Northeast Master Executive Council v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    506 F.2d 97 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 19, 1974

    Peter Carey, et al. v. J. J. … Outland v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • LCF, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    129 F.3d 1276 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1997

    See, e.g., Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951); Schaeff Inc. v. NLRB, 113 F.3d 264, 266 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Gold Coast Restaurant Corp. v. NLRB, 995 F.2d 257, 263 (D.C. … v. NLRB, 56 F.3d 224, 228-29 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Firestone v. Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2019

    In Kriebel v. … In Jenkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Longshore & Warehouse Union v. National Labor Relations Board

    705 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 6, 2017

    Our review of unfair labor practice determinations by the Board is “quite narrow.” Traction Wholesale Ctr. Co. v. NLRB, 216 F.3d 92, 99 (D.C. Cir. 2000). … Under this standard, the Board’s findings are “conclusive” if supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e); Universal Camera Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • James Banyard v. National Labor Relations Board, McLean Trucking Company, Intervenor. Clay D. Ferguson v. National Labor Relations Board

    505 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 1974

    If it were not present, the Board’s abstention might constitute [ ] not deference, *346 but abdication.” 19 Moreover, shortly thereafter in Local Union 715 v. … Associated Press v. NLRB, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 396, 401 , 492 F.2d 662 , 667 (1974). . Ibid. . Local Union 2188, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 172 , 494 F.2d 1087, 1091 (1974). . Local Union 715, AFL-CIO v.

    Criticized by National Labor Relations Board v. Max Factor and Company v. Luisa Gratz, Intervenor, 640 F.2d 197 (1981)Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Lake Central Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    239 F.2d 46 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1956

    Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 234 F.2d 62 , 64. … See American Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 343 , 179 F.2d 437 ; Sanders Bros. Radio Station v. Federal Communications Commission, 70 App.D.C. 297 , 106 F.2d 321 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Ass'n of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board

    717 F.3d 947 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 2013

    Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, with whom Circuit Judge BROWN joins. … Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Brown, 554 U.S. 60, 67 , 128 S.Ct. 2408 , 171 L.Ed.2d 264 (2008).

    Overruled on other grounds by American Meat Institute v. United States Department of Agriculture, 760 F.3d 18 (2014)Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.