Case law

Ryan v. Brown

104 N.Y.S. 871 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 10, 1907

Brown v. Gabel

47 Misc. 2d 288 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1965

Y. 256 ), the drawing of conflicting inferences would rest solely with the board, but having here determined that the administrative record made by the board was completely inadequate for any purpose I should have remitted … Div. 872 ; Matter of Emray Realty Corp. v. Abrams, 309 N. Y. 888 ; Matter of Rosin v. McGoldrick, 280 App. Div. 943 ; Matter of R. E. Assoc. v. McGoldrick, 280 App. Div. 202 ).

People v. Brown

277 A.D.2d 972 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2000

Conforti, 263 AD2d 513, 514 , lv denied 94 NY2d 878 ; see, People v Mailey, 262 AD2d 977 ; People v Sims, 217 AD2d 912 , lv denied 87 NY2d 851 ). … The jury may not use a magnifying glass for the impermissible purpose of comparing fingerprints (see, People v Moody, 195 AD2d 1016, 1017 ; People v Fields [appeal *973 No. 1], 152 AD2d 958 , lv denied 75 NY2d 812 ).

People v. Brown

251 A.D.2d 341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1998

as to People’s exhibits 20 and 21, the People showed “ ‘circumstances providing] reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged condition’ ” of the canvas bag and bullets found near the defendant’s apartment (People v … Julian, 41 NY2d 340 , 343, quoting Amaro v City of New York, 40 NY2d 30, 35 ).

People v. Brown

303 A.D.2d 175 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 6, 2003

that any of these incidents constituted false allegations and since defendant made no showing that the circumstances of these unrelated allegations bore a “significant probative relation” to the instant charges (People v … Accordingly, there was no violation of defendant’s right of confrontation (see Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]). We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

People v. Brown

2021 NY Slip Op 07436 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2021

People v Brown ( 2021 NY Slip Op 07436 ) People v Brown 2021 NY Slip Op 07436 Decided on December 23, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … RICHARD BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Benson v. Brown

10 Wend. 258 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1833

Hake v. Brown

44 F. 734 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Jan 9, 1891

The complainant cites the cases of Strauss v. Meyer, 22 Fed. Rep. 467, and of Tuck v. Olds, 29 Fed. Rep. 883, in support of hiS contention. … Stimpson v. Brooks, 3 Blatchf. 456 ; Wooster v. Handy, 23 Fed. Rep. 49; Spill v. Manufacturing Co., 28 Fed. Rep. 870; Factory v. Corning, 7 Blatchf. 17 . See also the opinion of Judge Jackson in Ingham v.

People v. Brown

309 A.D.2d 871 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 20, 2003

(see People v Lopez, 161 AD2d 670, 671 [1990]). … Nasario, 258 AD2d 599, 600 [1999]; People v Chedick, 246 AD2d 551 [1998]; People v Towles, 207 AD2d 848 [1994]).

People v. Brown

56 A.D.2d 543 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1977

The agents then climbed up the fire escape, entered the apartment through the sixth floor window and found defendant herein, Arthur Brown, in the process of flushing narcotics down the toilet. … (See, also, Rice v Wolff, 388 F Supp 185 , affd 513 F2d 1280, cert granted 422 US 1055 .) Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Lane and Yesawich, JJ.

People v. Brown

124 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 24, 1986

The proof adduced at the hearing established, under the totality of the circumstances, that the defendant made the statements voluntarily after he knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights (see, People v Anderson … , 42 NY2d 35 ; People v Woods, 89 AD2d 1022 ).

Fox v. Brown

15 N.Y.2d 597 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1964

Brown v. Moodie

116 A.D.2d 980 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 24, 1986

Tompkins v R. B. D. … It was clearly improper for the court to communicate with the juror in absence of the parties (see, Silverman v New Rochelle Hosp., 98 AD2d 774 ; Linke v Savage, 39 AD2d 326, 327 ; Gundersen v All Am.

People v. Brown

203 A.D.2d 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1994

, People v Bond, 156 AD2d 573 ). … Soto, 198 AD2d 38 ; People v Fulmore, 133 AD2d 169, 170 ; see also, People v Morales, 37 NY2d 262, 271-272 ; People v Kirkland, 192 AD2d 414 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1075 ).

Donaldson v. Brown

24 A.D.2d 714 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 1965

Assuming that the New York City Mayor’s Executive Order No. 49 (1958), adopted by the Board of Estimate and Apportionment, and the Rules and' Regulations of the *715 Commissioner of Marine and Aviation are valid and enforcible … Wood v. Board of Assessors, 137 N. Y. 201 ; Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist v. Cruise, 259 N. Y. 358 .)

People v. Brown

69 Misc. 2d 412 · New York County Courts · Jan 25, 1972

Worrel v. Brown

177 A.D.2d 446 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 26, 1991

Weisz v Levitt, 59 AD2d 1002, 1003 ). … Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 143-144 ; Matter of Jones v Ward, 166 AD2d 323 ).

Hubbard v. Brown

35 A.D. 254 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

IV, art. 18; Stephens v. Vroman, 16 N. Y. 381 .)

People v. Brown

121 A.D.2d 460 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1986

This court affirmed the judgment (see, People v Brown, 92 AD2d 872 ). … This court has already considered the defendant’s sentence and, therefore, need not do so again (see, People v Brown, 92 AD2d 872 , revd on other grounds, 62 NY2d 743 , supra). Thompson, J.

Baldwin v. Brown

37 How. Pr. 385 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1868