Case law

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

300 F. Supp. 1358 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Apr 23, 1969

This de jure segregation was outlawed by the two decisions of th'e Supreme Court in Brown v. … The actions of School Boards and district courts must now be judged under Green v. New Kent County rather than under the milder lash of Brown v. Board of Education.

Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of Education

257 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 2, 1962

Davis v. Ludlum, 255 N.C. 663 , 122 S.E. 2d 500 ; 89 C.J.S., Trial, secs. 635 and 636. … Bradham v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 589 , 73 S.E. 2d 555 ; 89 C.J.S., ibid.

Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen

139 N.C. App. 269 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2000

A legislative body such as the Board, when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body. Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 469 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 136-37 (1974). … Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 625 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 382 (1980).

Greenville City Board of Education v. Evans

21 N.C. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1974

Respondents contend that the Board is a necessary party inasmuch as the court cannot order that the land be taken when the taking cannot be accomplished as a matter of law. Vance County v. … Highway Comm. v. Hamilton, 5 N.C. App. 360 , 168 S.E. 2d 419 (1969).

Riddle v. Buncombe Cty. Bd. of Educ.

256 N.C. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 17, 2017

BUNCOMBE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; JAMES BEATTY, in his Individual Capacity, and in his Official Capacity with the Buncombe County Board of Education; and RODERICK BROWN, JR., in his Individual Capacity, and in his Official … Brown, Jr.

State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Revenue v. Brown Realty Co.

204 N.C. 123 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 25, 1933

Willis v. City of Southport Board of Adjustment

129 N.C. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 1998

action, Sherrill v. … See Smith v. Smith, 111 N.C.

Archie v. Durham Pub. Sch. Bd. of Educ.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 7, 2022

ARCHIE V. … ARCHIE V. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION 2022-NCCOA-375 Opinion of the Court AFFIRMED. Judges DIETZ and JACKSON concur.

Presley E. Brown Lumber Co. v. Textile Banking Co.

248 N.C. 308 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1958

Discount Corp. v. Young, 224 N.C. 89 , 29 S.E. 2d 29 ; R.R. v. Simpkins, 178 N.C. 273 , 100 S.E. 418 ; Etheridge v. Hilliard, 100 N.C. 250 ; Bynum v. Miller, 89 N.C. 393 . … Mastin v. Marlow, 65 N.C. 695 .

Harmon v. Cumberland County Board of Education

186 F. Supp. 3d 500 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · May 5, 2016

Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 348 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 575 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)). … However, the superintendent’s recommendation “is only advisory” and “ultimate responsibility rests with the board” to decide whether to renew a teacher’s contract. Abell v. Nash Cty.

Ocean Hill v. Currituck Board of Comm.

641 S.E.2d 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2007

Stein v. Asheville City Board of Education

360 N.C. 546 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 29, 2006

Craig v. Asheville City Board of Education

142 N.C. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 2001

Claims alleging a violation of section 115C-325(m)(2) give rise to a right of action that should be resolved by the court and not the school board. See Sigmon v. Poe, 528 F.2d 311 (4th Cir. 1975). … See Hallman v. CharlotteMecklenburg Board of Education, 124 N.C. App. 435 , 477 S.E.2d 179 (1996); Orange County v. Heath, 282 N.C. 292, 294 , 192 S.E.2d 308, 309 (1972); see also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-42 (1999).

Efird v. Board of Commissioners

219 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941

Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 7 . It was held in Meador v. Thomas, 205 N. … Tbat tbe board of commissioners bad tbe power to abolish tbe court during tbe term of tbe judge was held in Queen v. Comrs. of Haywood, supra.

Thomas v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Edu.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jul 6, 2010

Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). The terms of the Tort Claims Act must be strictly construed. Northwestern Distrib., Inc. v. DOT , 41 N.C. … Pulley v. Rex Hosp. , 326 N.C. 701 , 392 S.E.2d 380 (1990). 3.

Rose v. Currituck County Board of Education

83 N.C. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1986

Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). As originally drafted, the statute did not contain the second paragraph of G.S. 115C-325(d)(2). … See Faison v. New Hanover Co. Board of Education, 75 N.C. App. 334 , 330 S.E. 2d 511 (1985). The order appealed from is reversed and this cause is remanded for a full trial on the merits. Reversed and remanded.

Anderson v. Jackson County Board of Education

76 N.C. App. 440 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 1985

Artis v. Artis, 228 N.C. 754 , 47 S.E. 2d 228 (1948). … See Lackey v. Board of Education, 258 N.C. 460 , 128 S.E. 2d 806 (1963), in which our Supreme Court reached the same result on similar facts. Defendant’s assignment of error is thus without merit.

McKethan v. Board of Commissioners

92 N.C. 243 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 15, 1885

arrest the action of the commissioners in carrying into full effect *249 the act of March 8, 1883, ch. 260, as well as the matter of law arising thereon, are essentially the same as those considered and disposed of in Evans v.

Board of Education v. Town of Henderson

127 N.C. 8 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 9, 1900

Summerlin v. Cowles, 107 N. C., 459 ; Cook v. Moore, 100 N. C., 294 . In the order of Judge Moore referring this case to W. B.

Eller v. Board of Education of Buncombe County

242 N.C. 584 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1955

See Kirby v. Board of Education, 230 N.C. 619 , 55 S.E. 2d 322 . … Our decisions are to the effect that a county board of education has immunity from liability for torts of its members or agents (Benton v. *586 Board of Education, 201 N.C. 653 , 161 S.E. 96 ; Hansley v.