Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIL

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • Smith v. Pappas

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 3, 2022

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity shields “government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … “…[Q]ualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages when their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robinette v. Chicago Land Clearance Commission

    115 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 26, 1951

    Undeniably, it has been clearly established that, where a state law is enacted for a public purpose, complaining parties will not be heard in a court of law where they seek to invoke the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment … immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, plaintiffs must be able to point to the provision of the Federal Constitution or statutes by which the privileges or immunities are conferred.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Varela v. St. Elizabeth's Hospital of Chicago

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 7, 2006

    The trial court found, however, that the school board was immunized from liability for its employee's misconduct in part by section 2-201 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (745 ILCS … 10/2-201 (West 2000) (Tort Immunity Act)), and dismissed the complaint.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tequila Smith and Coretta Van Dyke v. Precious Dunn and City of Chicago

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 3, 2026

    The Seventh Circuit declined to grant summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Id. at 235. … Dunn is entitled to qualified immunity. c.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clyde v. Human Rights Commission

    206 Ill. App. 3d 283 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 20, 1990

    The evidence clearly established that the relative training levels of NCR employees was directly related to the age of the employees. … The distinction between “qualified” and “able to perform” is artificial.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • People v. Seymour

    53 Ill. App. 3d 367 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 6, 1977

    Clearly, this did not lie within the scope of review at the hearing on his probation revocation. Nevertheless, North is cited in People v. Yackle, 42 Ill. … After carefully reviewing the record, there is insufficient credible evidence to support the charges and establish appellants’ guilt by a preponderance of the evidence.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Youngblood

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 2026

    “Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” White v. … At the motion to dismiss stage, to overcome an assertion of qualified immunity, Youngblood must have alleged a violation of a statutory or constitutional right that was clearly established at the time of the violation so

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States Ex Rel. Chandler v. Hektoen Institute for Medical Research

    35 F. Supp. 2d 1078 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 1999

    Defendant Hektoen moves to dismiss Counts I and III, arguing that: (1) the FCA’s qui tarn provisions are unconstitutional; and (2) plaintiff does not allege that Hektoen’s actions violated clearly established Illinois public … Finally, the Court grants Hektoen’s and the County Defendants’ motions to dismiss Count III because plaintiff does not allege that her discharge violated clearly established Illinois public policy.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Carver v. Sheriff of La Salle County

    203 Ill. 2d 497 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 6, 2003

    own policies, but they lack authority to levy taxes or establish their own budgets. … The plain language of section 9 — 102 clearly expresses the legislature’s intent that this statutory provision is to apply equally to judgments or settlements.

    Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Village of Lemont

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 23, 2021

    right was clearly established at [that] time.” … In making a qualified immunity determination, courts cannot define “clearly established” at a high level of generality, therefore, relying on Graham alone does not create clearly established law.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Minerly v. Holt

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 30, 2020

    To overcome qualified immunity, the facts viewed in the light most favorable to Plaintiff must “show that the defendant[s] violated a constitutional right” and that “the right was clearly established at [that] time.” … Therefore, qualified immunity is not available to Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Parks v. Pavkovic

    536 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 19, 1982

    It can no longer be the policy of the Government to merely establish an unenforceable goal requiring all children to be in school. … Section 504 prohibits discrimination against otherwise qualified handicapped individuals.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • People v. Hamilton

    27 Ill. App. 3d 249 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 20, 1975

    The trial court then granted the State’s request to grant Alsbury immunity from prosecution. … robbery and escape. “ ‘[Wjhere it is contended that the punishment imposed in a particular case is excessive, though within the limits prescribed by the legislature, this court should not disturb the sentence unless it clearly

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • DeJong v. Pembrook

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 20, 2023

    Because DeJong has properly pleaded a constitutional violation, Robb can receive qualified immunity only if her conduct was not clearly established as unlawful. … Again, because DeJong has properly pleaded a constitutional violation, Pembrook and Ball can receive qualified immunity only if their conduct was not clearly established as unlawful.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Archie v. City Of Chicago

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 12, 2023

    Citing the “record here and well-established case law,” the magistrate judge allowed plaintiffs to proceed with discovery related to punitive damages, although the court has not yet evaluated defendants’ qualified immunity … According to defendants, “a core purpose of the qualified immunity doctrine is furthered by limiting discovery pending adjudication of a qualified immunity defense,” such as limiting or delaying discovery into personal

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eckerman v. City of Peoria

    336 Ill. App. 570 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 8, 1949

    The facts in the instant case are clearly distinguishable from the facts in Patteson v. City of Peoria, 386 Ill. 460 . … She was not a qualified elector of the municipality and therefore was not qualified to hold a municipal office. She never executed any bond and never took or subscribed any oath as provided for municipal officers.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alencastro v. Sheahan

    297 Ill. App. 3d 478 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 28, 1998

    Although defendant’s office clearly plays a role in the eviction process, that is not to say that defendant exercises final policymaking authority over that process. … Additionally, liability cannot be imposed upon a supervisory official without establishing that the official was directly responsible for the improper activity. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 373-77 , 46 L.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Adelberg v. Labuszewski

    447 F. Supp. 267 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 2, 1978

    Applying this two level standard we determined that the defense of immunity had not been established on the record before us at that time: “Turning to the first test, in the instant case we are faced with allegations and … This result is consistent with the language of Wood which seems clearly to pose the malice test as an alternative independent of the knowledge test.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gapinske v. Town of Condit

    250 Ill. App. 3d 1045 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 16, 1993

    The supreme court in West spoke of this 1986 amendment as follows: "The legislature thus clearly, intended to enlarge the scope of section 3-104's immunity and to immunize absolutely the failure to initially provide a traffic … For instance, in West ( 147 Ill.2d at 7 , 167 Ill.Dec. at 977 , 588 N.E.2d at 1107 ), the court wrote the following: "Rather, section 3-104 clearly and unequivocally states that the municipality is immune from all liability

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Chicago v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UNIV.

    293 Ill. App. 3d 892 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 21, 1997

    The Illinois Supreme Court has clearly held that a claim for declaratory relief is not a present claim. … Furthermore, the Illinois Municipal Code of 1961 authorized municipalities to establish and maintain parks.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.