Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

310 F.2d 565 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 28, 1962

B. v. Pugh and Barr, 4 Cir., 1952, 194 F. 2d 217 ; N. L. R. B. v. Noroian, 9 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 172 ; N. L. R. B. v. Auburn Curtain, 1 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 826 ; Kovach v. N. L. R. … B., 7 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d 138, 143, 144 ; Kiekhaefer Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 1960, 273 F.2d 314, 316-317 , cert. den’d 362 U.S. 950 , 80 S.Ct. 861 , 4 L.Ed.2d 868 ; N. L. R. B. v. Giustina Bros.

E.H. v. Matin

201 W. Va. 463 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1997

Syllabus Point 1, Nelson v. West Virginia Public Employees Insurance Board, 171 W.Va. 445 , 300 S.E.2d 86 (1982). … Syllabus Point 1, State v. Frazier, 198 W.Va. 678 , 482 S.E.2d 663 (1996).

Dorothy King, R.N. and Patricia Battle, R.N. v. Virginia Betts,, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities, in her Individual Capacity

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 18, 2009

Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Pickering v. Board of Educ. … Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983); Pickering v. Board of Educ. Of Township High School Dist. 205, Will City, 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968)).

Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

379 F.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 17, 2004

Retroactivity Brown argues that because the Board applied to him the parole statute as amended in 1993, the Board violated his rights. … In postponing Brown’s parole release date, the Board retroactively applied a version of a parole statute enacted after Brown’s crimes to Brown’s detriment.

Veton Vejseli v. Scott Duffy, Thomas DiFiore, Scott Flanders, Elizabeth LaPuma, and Ionic Digital, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware · Apr 24, 2025

Challenging Board Reduction Resolution [hereinafter Compl.], Dkt. 24; see 1 Allen v. … Brookfield Asset Mgmt., Inc. v.

Brown v. Brown (In Re Brown)

74 B.R. 968 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Jun 25, 1987

Beede v. Beede, 186 Conn. 191, 195 [ 440 A.2d 283 ] (1982). Forsdick v. Turgeon, supra, slip op. at 5, quoting Weiman v. Weiman, 188 Conn. 232, 234 , 449 A.2d 151 (1982). … Brown v. David R. Brown, Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, Judicial District of Fairfield at Stamford, Docket No. FA 79 0042043 (July 30, 1980). 2 . Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1. 3 . Plaintiffs Exhibit 2. 4 .

Richardson v. Zoning Board of Review

101 R.I. 194 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jul 14, 1966

Fitzgerald v. Board of Review, 99 R. I. 221, 206 A.2d 635 ; Bastedo v. Board of Review , 89 R. I. 420. It is desirable that a zoning board in its decision should adhere to the language of the statute and ordinances. … We observed in Center Realty Corp. v. Zoning Board of Review, 96 R.

Armbruster Ex Rel. Armbruster v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance

687 F. Supp. 403 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 7, 1988

Co. v. Dedeaux, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1549 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987), and Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. … Brown v. Retirement Committee of Briggs & Stratton, 797 F.2d 521, 525-26 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 1311 , 94 L.Ed.2d 165 (1987).

Brown v. Brown

185 S.W.3d 811 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2006

Joanne Brown (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment of dissolution of marriage in accordance with the parties’ property settlement and separation agreement. … Budd v. Budd, 157 S.W.3d 229, 230 (Mo.App. E.D.2004). This Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed.

Jackson v. Widnall

99 F.3d 710 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 14, 1996

Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835, 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969, 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Rowe v. Sullivan, 967 F.2d 186, 189 (5th Cir.1992). … See 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). 11 See Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown-Brockmeyer Co.

143 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 1944

National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., 314 U. S. 469 , 62 S.Ct. 344 , 86 L.Ed. 348 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., supra; National Labor Relations Board v. Ford Motor Co., supra; Midland Steel Products Co. v.

Ex Parte Geiken

28 S.W.3d 553 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 4, 2000

Nichols v. … Similarly, in Board of Pardons v.

Wanner-Brown v. Brown

312 P.3d 1106 · Alaska Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2013

INTRODUCTION Conrad Brown and Tammy Wanner-Brown married in 1992. In 2011 Conrad filed for divorce. A trial was scheduled to resolve both child custody and property disputes. … Facts Conrad Brown and Tammy Wanner-Brown were married in September 1992. The couple had two children together, who are now ages 17 and 13.

State v. Brown

901 N.W.2d 840 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · May 17, 2017

Burton v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.

393 P.3d 387 · Alaska Supreme Court · Mar 17, 2017

Co. v. … Brown, 171 P.3d 142, 148 (Alaska 2007) (citing Vincent by (continued...

Phyllis Zanette Brown v. Eugene Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia · Nov 14, 2023

PHYLLIS ZANETTE BROWN v. EUGENE BROWN. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.

Brown v. Brown (In Re Brown)

177 B.R. 116 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 1, 1994

Brown (Debt- or) in the above-captioned adversary proceeding in which the Debtor names as defendants Frances R. Brown (Ms. Brown), Jeanne L. Coleman (Ms. Coleman), Steven T. Northcutt (Mr. Northcutt) and Stephen W. … Baucom v. Baucom, 397 So.2d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hope v. Lipkin, 156 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).

David Pei-Chi Tien v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

638 F.2d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 12, 1981

Standard of Review The Board’s finding that Tien is statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status is subject to review on appeal for errors of law. Ka Fung Chan v. … Yui Sing Tse v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Brown

62 L.R.A. 974 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1903

In Barthrop v. Tucker, 29 Wash. 666 ( 70 Pac. 120 ), we said: “In Sears v. … In Condee v. Barton, 62 Cal. 1 , it is said: “There is no judgment which is final until a judgment is recorded.” And in Broder v.

Hayes ex rel. Hayes v. Thornton

501 So. 2d 1208 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 19, 1986

Berger v. United States, 255 U.S. 22, 31 [ 41 S.Ct. 230, 232 , 65 L.Ed. 481 ]. … United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 , 86 S.Ct. 1698, 1710 , 16 L.Ed. 778 (1966) (quoted in Hartman v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala., 436 So.2d 837 (Ala.1983)).