Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.96s
737 P.2d 932 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 19, 1987
City of Durant, supra note 16; Brown v. Fraser, Okl., 467 P.2d 464, 469 [1970] and Whitcomb v. City of Woodward, supra note 30 at 456. 32 . See cases cited in footnote 31 supra. 33 . … Bailey v. Uhls, Okl., 503 P.2d 877, 880 [1972]; Brown v. Fraser, supra note 31 and Shelton v. Lambert, Okl., 399 P.2d 467 [1965]. 35 . Shelton v. Lambert, supra note 34 at 470. 36 . Twist v.
Cited 26 timesPublished200 Okla. 577 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1948
Swindall v. State Election Board, 168 Okla. 97 , 32 P. 2d 691 ; State ex rel. Smith v. State Election Board, 169 Okla. 163 , 36 P. 2d 497 ; State ex rel. Williamson v. … Carter, Secretary of State, 177 Okla. 382 , 59 P. 2d 948 ; Maddox v. Hunt, 183 Okla. 465 , 83 P. 2d 553 ; Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okla. 169 , 170 P. 2d 200 ; Cooper v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Board of County Com'rs ex rel. Jennings v. Strange
202 Okla. 11 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 3, 1949
Board of Commissioners, 71 Okla. 71 , 177 P. 71 , we quoted with approval from Board of Commissioners of Shawnee County v. … Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Commissioners, 186 Okla. 102 , 95 P. 2d 878 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Webster
790 P.2d 1132 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 3, 1990
Whitener v. South Central Solid Waste Authority, 773 P.2d 1248 (Okla.1989). We do not find that situation here. As in Orrell v. B.F. … Whitener v. South Central Solid Waste Authority, supra, at 1249 n. 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of County Com'rs of Payne County v. Standard Accident Ins.
172 Okla. 355 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 21, 1935
The case of Board of Com’rs of Carter County v. Landrum, 163 Okla. 199 , 21 P. (2d) 736 , is relied upon by the insurance company to sustain its contention. … Boyd Co. v. Blachly, 171 Okla. 626 , 43 P. (2d) 462 , and Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Washington County, 171 Okla. 1 , 42 P. (2d) 533 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity of McAlester v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public Affairs
195 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 12, 1944
See Leonard v. City of Wagoner, 178 Okla. 553 , 63 P. 2d 93 ; Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. City of Wagoner, 181 Okla. 281 , 73 P. 2d 464 . … However, in Zachary v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedIn Re Protest Against Referendum Petition No. 5
185 Okla. 393 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1939
Regardless of the rule expressed in the above-cited authorities, in Keaton v. Brown, 171 Okla. 38 , 45 P.2d 109 ; and Oklahoma City v. … Roper v. Board of Education of the City of Okmulgee, 167 Okla. 382 , 29 P.2d 950 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedShoppers World Laundry Co. v. State Dry Cleaners' Board
415 P.2d 981 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1966
In Jack Lincoln Shops, Inc., v. … No contention is made in the instant action that these statutory provisions were not complied with when Board entered its order under consideration establishing the minimum prices. State Dry Cleaners’ Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Com'rs of Wagoner County v. School Dist. No. 1
137 Okla. 193 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 28, 1929
This contention cannot be upheld in view of the holding of this court in the cases of Board of Education, City of Sapulpa, v. Board of Co. Com’rs, Creek Co., 127 Okla. 132 , 260 Pac. 22 , and School Dist. … No. 7, Creek Co., v. Board of Co. Com’rs, Creek County, 135 Okla. 1 , 275 Pac. 292 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedDavis v. HUTTIG SASH AND DOOR COMPANY
288 F. Supp. 82 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 20, 1968
Brown v. National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards, 104 F.Supp. 685 (Cal.1951). The Tenth Circuit has recently considered this problem in Angle v. Sacks, 382 F.2d 655 (Tenth Cir. 1967). … The concern of Congress was rather that the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act could be defeated in particular cases by the passage of time * * * ” The case of Brown for and on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGoodin v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 14
601 P.2d 88 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 12, 1979
IRWIN, V. C. J., and HARGRAVE and OPALA, JJ., dissent. . … School Dist. v. Fincher, 510 S.W.2d 98, 103 (Tex.Civ.App.1974). . Lowery v. Oklahoma Beverage Control Board, 584 P.2d 720, 724 (Okl.1978).
Cited 6 timesPublished126 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1926
Brown testified that he built the Berwyn schoolhouse, which was a larger building than this one with the same number of rooms, for $20,000. … Wilson v. Nelson, 64 Ofcla. 467, 153 Pac. 1179 .
Cited 1 timesPublished509 P.2d 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1973
In paragraph 2 of the syllabus of Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund v. … In Consolidated Fuel Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNews-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs of LeFlore County
112 Okla. 138 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1925
case of Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. … Co-Operative Publishing Company, 104 Okla. 262 , 231 Pac. 251 , the Board of County Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Walker-Taylor Company, 104 Okla. 261 , 231 Pac. 252 , and the Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 1973
County Board of Adjustment. … The authority of the Boards of Adjustment is the subject of the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Pioneer, Inc. v. Carpenter
617 P.2d 210 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1980
In Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166, 168 , we cited State v. … Anglo-American Shipping Co. v. Federal Maritime Commission, 310 F.2d 606 (9th Cir. 1962); Brown v. Banking Board, 512 P.2d 166, 168 (Okl.1973). . Okla. Insp. Bur. v. State Bd. for Prop. & Cas.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSt. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board
172 Okla. 607 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935
The sole question here in *608 volved has been determined by the court in Morley v. State ex rel. … Board of Education, City of Tulsa, 171 Okla. 46 , 47 P. (2d) 170 , where it was held in paragraph 1 of the syllabus that: “Under the provisions of chapter 85, Session Laws 1933, a surplus balance and net unincumbered ad valorem
Cited 2 timesPublishedRE SUSPENSION OF CERTIFICATES OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS
2025 OK 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 2025
RE: Suspension of Certificates of Certified Shorthand Reporters ORDER The Oklahoma Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters has recommended to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma the suspension of the certificate … /S/CHIEF JUSTICE Rowe, C.J., Kuehn, V.C.J., Winchester, Edmondson, Combs, Gurich, Darby and Kane, JJ., concur. _______________________________________ CSR Exhibit A Name Reason CSR # Dennis Brown CSR #139 Renewal Fee Francine
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1969
See also, Brown v. State Election Board, Ok 1., 369 P.2d 140 (1962). … Co., v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStandard Paving Co. v. County Board of Equalization of Beckham County
135 Okla. 15 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 31, 1928
"On the other hand, the Supreme Court of the United States, in the case of Brown v. Houston, supra [114 W. S. 622], and this court, in the same, case, 33 La. … Under these circumstances, its situs approached nearer to permanency than did that of the sheep in the Wyoming case, or that of the coal in the Brown v. Houston Case.” In the case of Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna