Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.16s
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 21, 2025
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:25-cv-00460-FL-RN DERRICK BROWN … See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHicks v. Wake County Board of Education
187 N.C. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2007
App. 742, 744 , 641 S.E.2d 695, 696 (2007) (quoting McGuire v. Draughon, 170 N.C. App. 422, 424 , 612 S.E.2d 428, 430 (2005)). … Id. at 744, 641 S.E.2d at 697 (citing McCutchen v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen
139 N.C. App. 269 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2000
A legislative body such as the Board, when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body. Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 469 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 136-37 (1974). … Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 625 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 382 (1980).
Cited 48 timesPublishedGreenville City Board of Education v. Evans
21 N.C. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1974
Respondents contend that the Board is a necessary party inasmuch as the court cannot order that the land be taken when the taking cannot be accomplished as a matter of law. Vance County v. … Highway Comm. v. Hamilton, 5 N.C. App. 360 , 168 S.E. 2d 419 (1969).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBailey & Associates, Inc. v. Wilmington Board of Adjustment
202 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2010
App. 391, 393 , 574 S.E.2d 157, 160 (2002) (quoting Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Town of Garner, 139 N.C. … The superior court’s scope of review on certiorari is limited to errors alleged to have occurred before the local board. See Godfrey v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. Lane
248 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1958
S. v. Collins (N.M.), 297 P. 2d 325 ; Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith, 65 *139 So. 2d 654; Beeman v. Board of Pharmacy (Mich.), 35 N.W. 2d 354 ; Rosenblatt v. Board of Pharmacy (Cal.), 158 P. 2d 199 ; Stewart v. … In Thomas v. Board of Pharmacy, 152 N.C. 373 , 67 S.E. 925 , and McNair v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRevels v. Robeson County Board of Elections
167 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 2004
Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc., 331 N.C. 57, 63 , 414 S.E.2d 339, 342 (1992). Analysis Plaintiff brings forth two arguments for our review. … See Walker v. Bd. of Trustees of the N.C. Local Gov’t Emp. Ret. Sys., 348 N.C. 63, 66 , 499 S.E.2d 429, 431 (1998) (“Retirement ends employment.”).
Cited 2 timesPublishedMoore County Ex Rel. Child Enforcement Agency v. Brown
142 N.C. App. 692 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2001
App. 294, 296 , 524 S.E.2d 577, 581 (2000) (quoting White v. … See, e.g., Maney v. Maney, 126 N.C.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBryant v. State Board of Assessment
293 F. Supp. 1379 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 13, 1968
Brown, are Negro citizens of the United States and the State of North Carolina. They reside and own property in Brunswick County, North Carolina. … In Hamm v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 230 F.Supp. 156 (E.D.Va. 1964), Judge Bryan, writing for the court, said: “The ‘separate but equal’ racial doctrine was condemned a decade ago in Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBuford v. Morganton City Board of Education
244 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 1965
Liberally construed, the complaint originally questioned the sufficiency of the School Board’s overall plan of compliance with the constitutional requirements enunciated in Brown v. … Franklin v. County School Board of Giles County, 242 F.Supp. 371 , (D.C. Va. 1965), has been carefully examined.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBall v. Randolph County Board of Adjustment
349 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1998
Cited 4 timesPublishedBall v. Randolph County Board of Adjustment
129 N.C. App. 300 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 1998
Mize v. County of Mecklenburg, 80 N.C. App. 279, 284 , 341 S.E.2d 767, 770 (1986) (citing Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. … In Moore v. Bd. of Adjustment, 113 N.C.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHolt v. Albemarle Regional Health Services Board
362 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublishedMoore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
362 N.C. 360 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublishedEfird v. Board of Commissioners
219 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941
Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 7 . It was held in Meador v. Thomas, 205 N. … Tbat tbe board of commissioners bad tbe power to abolish tbe court during tbe term of tbe judge was held in Queen v. Comrs. of Haywood, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Union Development Co.
159 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912
County of Calhoun v. Emigrant Co., 93 U. S., 124 ; Fuller v. Hollis, 57 Ala., 435 ; Merchants Ins. Co. v. Nowlin, 56 S. W., 198 (Tex. Civ. … The case of Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 116 , does not antagonize the principle, and Craddock v. Barnes, 142 N. C., 89 , is in direct recognition of it.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBenton v. Board of Education of Cumberland County
201 N.C. 653 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1931
No-cause of action is stated in the complaint against the defendant, Board of Education of Cumberland County, or against the defendants, J. E. Reaves and W. T. Reaves. In Scales v. Winston-Salem, 189 N. C., 469 , 127 S. … Eeaves, is payable to the defendant, Board of Education of Cumberland County. These sureties are not liable to the plaintiff under the terms of the bond or on the principle upon which Gorrell v. Water Supply Co., 124 N.
Cited 17 timesPublishedOakes v. LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
659 S.E.2d 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008
659 S.E.2d 737 (2008) Martin Andrew OAKES v. LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Lincoln County Board of Education, Lincoln County Board of Commissioners. No. 61P07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 6, 2008.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOakes v. Lincoln County Board of Elections
362 N.C. 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Security Trust Co.
164 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna