Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

6.16s

  • Brown v. Bisignano

    District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Jul 21, 2025

    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:25-cv-00460-FL-RN DERRICK BROWN … See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hicks v. Wake County Board of Education

    187 N.C. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2007

    App. 742, 744 , 641 S.E.2d 695, 696 (2007) (quoting McGuire v. Draughon, 170 N.C. App. 422, 424 , 612 S.E.2d 428, 430 (2005)). … Id. at 744, 641 S.E.2d at 697 (citing McCutchen v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen

    139 N.C. App. 269 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2000

    A legislative body such as the Board, when granting or denying a conditional use permit, sits as a quasi-judicial body. Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458, 469 , 202 S.E.2d 129, 136-37 (1974). … Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620, 625 , 265 S.E.2d 379, 382 (1980).

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Greenville City Board of Education v. Evans

    21 N.C. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1974

    Respondents contend that the Board is a necessary party inasmuch as the court cannot order that the land be taken when the taking cannot be accomplished as a matter of law. Vance County v. … Highway Comm. v. Hamilton, 5 N.C. App. 360 , 168 S.E. 2d 419 (1969).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bailey & Associates, Inc. v. Wilmington Board of Adjustment

    202 N.C. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 2, 2010

    App. 391, 393 , 574 S.E.2d 157, 160 (2002) (quoting Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Town of Garner, 139 N.C. … The superior court’s scope of review on certiorari is limited to errors alleged to have occurred before the local board. See Godfrey v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • North Carolina Board of Pharmacy v. Lane

    248 N.C. 134 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1958

    S. v. Collins (N.M.), 297 P. 2d 325 ; Louisiana Board of Pharmacy v. Smith, 65 *139 So. 2d 654; Beeman v. Board of Pharmacy (Mich.), 35 N.W. 2d 354 ; Rosenblatt v. Board of Pharmacy (Cal.), 158 P. 2d 199 ; Stewart v. … In Thomas v. Board of Pharmacy, 152 N.C. 373 , 67 S.E. 925 , and McNair v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Revels v. Robeson County Board of Elections

    167 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 2004

    Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc., 331 N.C. 57, 63 , 414 S.E.2d 339, 342 (1992). Analysis Plaintiff brings forth two arguments for our review. … See Walker v. Bd. of Trustees of the N.C. Local Gov’t Emp. Ret. Sys., 348 N.C. 63, 66 , 499 S.E.2d 429, 431 (1998) (“Retirement ends employment.”).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moore County Ex Rel. Child Enforcement Agency v. Brown

    142 N.C. App. 692 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 2001

    App. 294, 296 , 524 S.E.2d 577, 581 (2000) (quoting White v. … See, e.g., Maney v. Maney, 126 N.C.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. State Board of Assessment

    293 F. Supp. 1379 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Dec 13, 1968

    Brown, are Negro citizens of the United States and the State of North Carolina. They reside and own property in Brunswick County, North Carolina. … In Hamm v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 230 F.Supp. 156 (E.D.Va. 1964), Judge Bryan, writing for the court, said: “The ‘separate but equal’ racial doctrine was condemned a decade ago in Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buford v. Morganton City Board of Education

    244 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Aug 23, 1965

    Liberally construed, the complaint originally questioned the sufficiency of the School Board’s overall plan of compliance with the constitutional requirements enunciated in Brown v. … Franklin v. County School Board of Giles County, 242 F.Supp. 371 , (D.C. Va. 1965), has been carefully examined.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Randolph County Board of Adjustment

    349 N.C. 348 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1998

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Randolph County Board of Adjustment

    129 N.C. App. 300 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 21, 1998

    Mize v. County of Mecklenburg, 80 N.C. App. 279, 284 , 341 S.E.2d 767, 770 (1986) (citing Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. … In Moore v. Bd. of Adjustment, 113 N.C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Holt v. Albemarle Regional Health Services Board

    362 N.C. 357 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    362 N.C. 360 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 10, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Efird v. Board of Commissioners

    219 N.C. 96 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1941

    Provision Co. v. Daves, 190 N. C., 7 . It was held in Meador v. Thomas, 205 N. … Tbat tbe board of commissioners bad tbe power to abolish tbe court during tbe term of tbe judge was held in Queen v. Comrs. of Haywood, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Union Development Co.

    159 N.C. 162 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 28, 1912

    County of Calhoun v. Emigrant Co., 93 U. S., 124 ; Fuller v. Hollis, 57 Ala., 435 ; Merchants Ins. Co. v. Nowlin, 56 S. W., 198 (Tex. Civ. … The case of Arrington v. Arrington, 114 N. C., 116 , does not antagonize the principle, and Craddock v. Barnes, 142 N. C., 89 , is in direct recognition of it.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Benton v. Board of Education of Cumberland County

    201 N.C. 653 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 18, 1931

    No-cause of action is stated in the complaint against the defendant, Board of Education of Cumberland County, or against the defendants, J. E. Reaves and W. T. Reaves. In Scales v. Winston-Salem, 189 N. C., 469 , 127 S. … Eeaves, is payable to the defendant, Board of Education of Cumberland County. These sureties are not liable to the plaintiff under the terms of the bond or on the principle upon which Gorrell v. Water Supply Co., 124 N.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Oakes v. LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS

    659 S.E.2d 737 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

    659 S.E.2d 737 (2008) Martin Andrew OAKES v. LINCOLN COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Lincoln County Board of Education, Lincoln County Board of Commissioners. No. 61P07-2. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 6, 2008.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oakes v. Lincoln County Board of Elections

    362 N.C. 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Security Trust Co.

    164 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1913

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.