Case law

Minteq International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

855 F.3d 329 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 2017

Connors v. Link Coal Co., 970 F.2d 902, 905 (D.C. Cir. 1992). However, we agree with the Board that the CBA did not cover all of the NCCA’s provisions. … DIRECTV, Inc. v. NLRB, 837 F.3d 25, 33 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics v. Jones

495 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 1985

Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 441 A.2d 889 (D.C.1981) (en banc). … District of Columbia v. Jones, 481 A.2d 456 (D.C.1984).

Stacia Hall v. District of Columbia Board of Elections

141 F.4th 200 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 20, 2025

See Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 105 F.4th 437, 443 (D.C. Cir. 2024). … Legion v. Am. Humanist Ass’n, 588 U.S. 29, 87 (2019) (Gorsuch, J., concurring in the judgment)). Nor is it dispositive that the plaintiffs’ injuries are “shared by all citizen voters.” Board Br. 26.

Elam v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF DC

530 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2007

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. [78, 89-90, 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978)]. Id. at 226 , 106 S.Ct. 507 .

Holmes v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

421 A.2d 27 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1980

The District of Columbia, citing Rakas v. … Neumann Properties, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 268 A.2d 605 (1970).

Randy Brown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (ORDER)

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 2019

See, e.g., Bridges v. … .”); Bradshaw v.

Carroll College, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

558 F.3d 568 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2009

In this petition for review, the college argues that its religious educational environment and affiliation with the United Presbyterian Church place it beyond the Board’s jurisdiction under NLRB v. … Workers, AFL-CIO v. NLRB, 727 F.2d 1184, 1191 n.5 (D.C. Cir. 1984); see also NLRB v. Cheney Cal. Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385, 388 (1946); Noel Foods v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 1113, 1121 (D.C.

Association of American Railroads v. Surface Transportation Board

146 F.3d 942 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1998

Co. v. … Action Network v.

Felix Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

251 F.3d 1051 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

Aroostook County v. NLRB, 81 F.3d 209, 215 n.5 (1996); see also Republic Avia- tion Corp. v. … See NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 617 (1969). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board's treatment of this factor. III.

Cocome v. District of Columbia Lottery & Charitable Games Control Board

560 A.2d 547 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1989

In so finding, OEA relied on Christie v. … See generally Scharf v.

METROPOLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT.

141 A.3d 1079 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2016

See Kopff v. … The Board may ... conduct further hearings or ... even reach a different result.” Washington Ethical Soc. v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 421 A.2d 14, 19 (D.C.1980) (quoting Salsbery v.

Resort Nursing Home v. National Labor Relations Board

389 F.3d 1262 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 30, 2004

We will uphold a Board rule as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act, even if we would have formulated a different rule had we sat on the Board. NLRB v. … Ohio v. NLRB, 268 F.3d 1095, 1102 (D.C. Cir. 2001), and provides ample justification for the Board’s posi- tion.

Sandula v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

979 A.2d 32 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Hosp. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 916 A.2d 149, 151 (D.C.2007) (citing Dietrich v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 293 A.2d 470, 473 (D.C.1972); Gay v. … Bochner's substantial medical experience recognized in either the Board’s findings of fact or its conclusions of law. We find these omissions troubling. Cf. Eilers v.

Boley v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

292 A.2d 807 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1972

Therefore, since the reissuance of the license was not in accordance with the Board’s own regulations, the order must be vacated. Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 545 , 79 S.Ct. 968 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1012 (1959); Hammond v. … See Allen v. Zoning Commission, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 24 , 449 F.2d 1100 (1971). .

American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board

235 F.2d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 3, 1956

Plaintiff (appellant), American President Lines, Ltd., a subsidized shipping operator, filed this action for a declaratory judgment against the defendants (appellees), the Federal Maritime Board and its individual members … Diminution of the fund is required by the statute to have the approval of the Board.

National Association of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board

846 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2012

v. … Lodge 64 v. NLRB, 949 F.2d 441 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (laches); see, e.g., Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 312 N.L.R.B. 444, 444 (1993) (equitable tolling); Strawsine Mfg.

Hornstein v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

321 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1974

PER CURIAM: In this petition for review of action by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (the Board), the parties agree that the issue presented is one of statutory construction respecting the transfer of a liquor license … It was then that the Board informed petitioners that it had no authority under the statute 2 to transfer the license.

Eichberg v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

273 F. 886 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 1921

In Haines v. … United States v Temple, 105 U. S. 97, 99 ( 26 L. Ed. 967 ) ; Moore v. United States, 249 U. S. 437 , 39 Sup. Ct. 322, 63 L.

Colker v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

474 A.2d 820 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1983

See Keefe Co. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 409 A.2d 624, 625-26 (D.C.1979). … Accordingly, the decision of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment is Affirmed.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

365 F.2d 898 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 1966

The scope of Leedom v. Kyne is a restricted one. Boire v. Greyhound Corp., supra. . See AFL v. … Courts do not rely upon theories in support of Board action advanced for the first time by Board counsel on appeal. See e.g., NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins.