Case law

Scott v. Brown

29 Misc. 320 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Oct 15, 1899

such board by showing a general custom prevailing in that trade with which the defendant is presumed to have knowledge. … Dickinson v. City of Poughkeepsie, 75 N. Y. 66 .

Wallace v. Brown

485 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, S.D. New York · Oct 9, 1979

Grounds for Motion Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b), 59(e) Respondents have filed a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(b), 59(e) to amend the Findings of Fact and Judgment in Wallace v. Brown, No. 79 Civ. 3545 (S.D.N.Y. … Evans, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co., 416 F.Supp. 224, 244 (N.D.Ill.1976).

Brown v. State

12 Misc. 3d 633 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2006

The procedural history of the case is documented in the reports of the decisions of the Court of Appeals (Brown v State of New York, 89 NY2d 172 [1996]) and the Appellate Division (Brown v State of New York, 250 AD2d 314 … [1998]; Brown v State of New York, 221 AD2d 681 [1995]; Brown v State of New York, 9 AD3d 23 [2004]).

Lukas v. Brown

181 A.D.2d 612 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 26, 1992

We agree with the IAS Court that this determination, based as it was on evaluations by Department experts, cannot be found to be a product of bad faith (see, Matter of Galas v Ward, 166 AD2d 275 ). … We would add that petitioner’s omission of material facts from her employment ápplication provides an independent basis for termination of her probationary employment (see, Matter of Ostoyich v State of New York, 99 AD2d

People v. Brown

7 N.Y.3d 729 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 2006

Brown v. Lavine

78 Misc. 2d 821 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1974

This is an article 78 proceeding brought by the petitioner, Maria Brown, for an order to annul and reverse the determination of respondent Commissioner of New York State Department of Social Services, which upheld the failure

Brown v. Kelly

244 F.R.D. 222 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 24, 2007

V 1. . See Brown I, 2007 WL 1573957 , at *4-5. . … Thompson v. Board of Educ. of the Romeo Cmty. Schs., 709 F.2d 1200, 1205 (6th Cir.1983) (quoting Mudd v. Busse, 68 F.R.D. 522, 527-28 (N.D.Ind.1975)). . See Def. Mem. at 28-29 (citing New York v.

People v. Brown

124 A.D.3d 675 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 14, 2015

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. … People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cestone v. Brown

163 A.D.2d 563 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 23, 1990

Corp. v Yarbrough, 104 AD2d 486 ; C&B Wholesale Stationery v De Bella Dresses, 43 AD2d 579 ; Costello v Hoffman, 30 AD2d 530 ). … Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Hooper and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

177 A.D.2d 585 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1991

The decision as to whether to grant an adjournment is ordinarily within the sound discretion of the trial court (see, People v Spears, 64 NY2d 698, 699-700 ; People v Wood, 129 AD2d 598 ). … It has also been stated that where the testimony sought from the proposed witness is cumulative, denial of an adjournment is proper (see, People v Cable, 63 NY2d 270, 283-284 ; People v Wood, supra).

Montoya v. Brown

233 A.D.2d 374 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1996

the contention that the county designated was not a proper one (CPLR 510 [1]) was untimely since no demand to change venue was served with the answer or before the answer had been served (see, CPLR 511 [a], [bj; Newman v … The defendants’ submission was insufficient to support an exercise of the court’s discretion to change venue on that ground (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169 ). Miller, J.

People v. Brown

278 A.D.2d 920 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 27, 2000

The court’s determination that there was no misconduct or prejudice must be afforded great weight and we see no basis to disturb it (see, People v Demetsenare, 243 AD2d 777, 778 , lv denied 91 NY2d 833 ; People v Pinckney … , 220 AD2d 539, 539-540, lv denied 87 NY2d 906 ; see also, People v Rodriguez, 71 NY2d 214, 219 ).

Brown v. Schneider

32 A.D.2d 712 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 21, 1969

Devine v. Keller, 32 A D 2d 34, 36.) … Brown has been entered upon the verdict of no cause of action.

Brown v. Allen

23 A.D.2d 591 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 1965

Brown v. Poritzky

35 A.D.2d 1007 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 1970

People v. Brown

177 A.D.2d 584 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1991

Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California ( 386 US 738 ) in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal. Ordered that the motion is granted, Joseph S. … Under the circumstances, the motion of the defendant’s assigned counsel to be relieved is granted and new appellate counsel is assigned (see, People v Casiano, 67 NY2d 906 ; People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 ). Bracken, J.

People v. Brown

284 A.D.2d 406 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 2001

—Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), imposed March 9, 2000, upon remittitur from this Court (see, People v Brown, 268 AD2d 593 ). … Corrica, 243 AD2d 722 ; People v Smith, 232 AD2d 586 ; People v Dell'Orfano, 197 AD2d 587 ; People v Gaines, 136 AD2d 731, 733 ).

Brown v. Lavine

47 A.D.2d 656 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 18, 1975

Brown on Behalf of Brown v. Chater

932 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 1996

Plaintiff Brenda Brown (“Brenda”), on behalf of her daughter Kristin Brown (“Kristin”), brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405 (g) and 1383(c)(3), challenging a final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security … Cruz v. Sullivan, 912 F.2d 8, 11 (2d Cir.1990). C.

Kuechenmeister v. Brown

1 A.D. 56 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1896