Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Woodhouse v. Board of Commissioners

    41 N.C. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1979

    Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974). … Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974); Craver v. Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40 , 147 S.E. 2d 599 (1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning Board

    356 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 28, 2002

    Co. v. Board of Aldermen of Chapel Hill, 284 N.C. at 469 , 202 S.E.2d at 137 . … See Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of Aldermen of Garner, 139 N.C.

    Cited 144 timesPublished
  • Goodwin v. Goldsboro City Board of Education

    67 N.C. App. 243 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1984

    The applicable standard of judicial review for an appeal of a school board decision is set forth in G.S. 150A-51. Overton v. Board of Education, 304 N.C. 312 , 283 S.E. 2d 495 (1981); Faulkner v. … Overton v. Board of Education, 304 N.C. at 322 , *246 283 S.E. 2d at 501 ; Faulkner v. Board of Education, 65 N.C. App. at 486 , 309 S.E. 2d at 550 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Boston v. N.C. Private Protective Services Board

    96 N.C. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1989

    Id. at 238 , 293 S.E.2d at 176 , citing Thompson v. Wake Cty. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E.2d 538 (1977). … It is clear that the trial court was correct when it found that the Board did not consider petitioner’s experience. In his proposal for decision, the ALJ relied on King v. Board, 82 N.C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lathan v. Union County Board of Commissioners

    47 N.C. App. 357 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1980

    See Blades v. City of Raleigh, 280 N.C. 531 , 187 S.E. 2d 35 (1972), in which the validity of a City of *359 Raleigh zoning ordinance was determined on summary judgment. … Similarly, in the minutes of the Union County Board of Commissioners’ meeting, held 6 November 1978, are found the reasons for a favorable recommendation by the Union County Planning Board: “(1) Because of how long it has

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. McDowell County Board of Education

    68 N.C. App. 541 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1984

    Teer Co. v. Highway Commission, 265 N.C. 1 , 143 S.E. 2d 247 (1965); Withers v. Board of Education, 32 N.C. App. 230 , 231 S.E. 2d 276 (1977). … Alliance Co. v. State Hospital, 241 N.C. 329 , 85 S.E. 2d 386 (1955).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Peterkin v. Columbus County Board of Education

    126 N.C. App. 826 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1997

    Rather than administratively appealing the Columbus County Board of Education’s decision to terminate his employment, Mr. Peterkin chose to file the subject action nearly three years later. … Sterling v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. Authority, 897 F.Supp. 893, 896 (E.D.Pa. 1995) (citing Weldon v. Kraft, Inc., 896 F.2d 793, 796 (3d Cir. 1990); O’Brien v. City of Philadelphia, 837 F.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Rand

    42 N.C. App. 202 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 3, 1979

    Kirkman v. Highway Commission, 257 N.C. 428, 433 , 126 S.E. 2d 107, 111 (1962). Special benefits are those which arise from the peculiar relation of the land in question to the public improvement. … Templeton v. Highway Commission, 254 N.C. 337 , 118 S.E. 2d 918 (1961).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Township Road Commission v. Board of Commissioners

    188 N.C. 362 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1924

    Hargrave v. Comrs., 168 N. C., p. 626; Trustees v. Webb, 155 N. C., p. 379. … Blair v. Comrs., 187 N. C., p. 488; Kinston v. R. R., 183 N. C., pp. 14, 20, 21; Burgin v. Smith, 151 N. C., p. 561. The decision in Bramham’s case, 171 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Newgent v. Buncombe County Board of Education

    340 N.C. 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1995

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Beatty v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

    329 N.C. 691 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 14, 1991

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Goldberg v. Anderson-Brown Patrol, Inc.

    199 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 7, 1961

    On August 18, 1960, following a hearing had at the summer term of this court in Asheville, an injunction was issued in civil action No. 1862 in which the defendant Anderson-Brown Patrol, Inc., was enjoined from violating … Anderson v. Mt. Clement Pottery Company, 328 U.S. 680 , 66 S.Ct. 1187 , 90 L.Ed. 1515 . The plaintiff has satisfied the burden of showing the work was performed and that there was improper compensation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Horton v. Orange County Board of Education

    342 F. Supp. 1244 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 2, 1971

    Brown v. Hirst, 443 F.2d 899 (4th Cir. 1971); Hodgin v. Noland, 435 F.2d 859 (4th Cir. 1970). … Wall v. Stanly County Board of Education, 259 F.Supp. 238 (M.D.N.C.1966); Chambers v. Hendersonville City Board of Education, 364 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1966). But this is not the case here.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brandon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Edu.

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 16, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nationsbank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Brown

    118 N.C. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 1995

    Brown and Thomas F. … Guaranty § 72 (1943); First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. McLamb, 112 N.C. App. 645, 649 , 439 S.E.2d 166, 168 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parsons v. Alleghany County Board of Education

    4 N.C. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 26, 1969

    Conrad v. Motor Express, 265 N.C. 427 , 144 S.E. 2d 269 . In the case of Kirby v. … Luck v. Rice, 182 Va. 373 , 29 S.E. 2d 238 ; Unger v. Rackley, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Kelly

    228 N.C. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2013

    Reginald Brown Kelly (“defendant”) appeals from an order denying his motion to modify alimony. … Britt v. Britt, 49 N.C.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Board of Education

    202 N.C. 354 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1932

    Hutchinson v. Commissioners, 172 N. C., 844 , 90 S. E., 892 ; Warner v. Halyburton, 187 N. C., 414 , 121 S. E., 756 ; Mfg. Co., v. Blaylock, 192 N. C., 407 , 135 S. E., 136 . … No recovery is permissible against the individual members of the board. Noland v. Trustees, 190 N. C., 250 , 129 S. E., 577 . Modified and affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coppedge v. Franklin County Board of Education

    273 F. Supp. 289 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 1967

    In 1954 the United States Supreme Court held in Brown v. … See, Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Eastern Outdoor, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

    150 N.C. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 4, 2002

    Where the petitioner asserts that the board’s decision is based on an error of law, de novo review is proper. See Westminster Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary Zoning Bd. of Adjust., 140 N.C. … See Town of Hillsborough v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.