Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
8.64s
Stillwell v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners
872 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 5, 1995
Wolford v. Lewis, 860 F.Supp. 1123, 1134 (S.D.W.Va.1994); Easley, 841 F.Supp. at 672 . In their briefs, both sides rely on School Board of Nassau County v. … Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 644 , 94 S.Ct. 791, 798 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974) (mandatory maternity leave for public school teachers found to be unconstitutional); Bombrys v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedState ex rel. Van Raalte v. Board of Equalization
256 Mo. 455 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1914
[State ex *462 rel. v. Bank, 234 Mo. 194 ; State ex rel. v. Stephens, 146 Mo. 662 ; Ward v. Board of Equalization, 135 Mo. 309 ; Black v. McGonigle, 103 Mo. l. c. 197; State ex rel. v. Moss, 69 Mo. 495 .] … [State ex rel. v. Wilder, 198 Mo. 166 ; Bremen Bank v. Umrath, 55 Mo. App. 43 .]
Cited 3 timesPublishedHohenshell v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n
140 Mo. 566 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 6, 1897
In the recent case of Towle v. American Building & Loan Association, 75 Fed. … Towle v. American Building & Loan Association, supra.
Cited 28 timesPublishedWestern Newspaper Union v. Woodward
133 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 1955
on the basis of the representations made by both Brown and Walters, affiant recommended, and so did Brown, to plaintiff's Board of Directors, at their meeting of March 29, 1951, acceptance of Woodward’s offer of $125 per … Brown, 17 How. 182 , 58 U.S. 23 , 15 L.Ed. 208 ; Smyth Sales v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co., 3 Cir., 128 F.2d 697 ; James-Dickenson Farm Mortgage Co. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedCentral Bank of Clayton v. State Banking Board of Missouri
509 S.W.2d 175 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1974
See also, Banking Board v. Turner Industrial Bank, 165 Colo. 147 , 437 P.2d 531 (Colo.1968); Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. Green, 300 A.2d 227 (Del.Super.1972); First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. … Rouveyrol v. Donnelly, 365 Mo. 686 , 285 S.W. 2d 669, 674 (1956); Banking Board v. Turner Industrial Bank, 165 Colo. 147 , 437 P.2d 531, 534 (1968).
Cited 25 timesPublishedAziz ex rel. Brown v. Jack in the Box, Eastern Division, LP
477 S.W.3d 98 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2015
Adams v. Badgett, 114 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Mo.App.E.D.2003). … See Hogate v. American Golf Corp., 97 S.W.3d 44 (Mo.App.E.D.2002); Cochran v. Burger King Corp., 937 S.W.2d 358 (Mo.App.W.D.1996).
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Giffen
651 S.W.2d 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1983
Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1, 17 , 99 S.Ct. 887, 898 , 59 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979); City of New Orleans v. Dukes, 427 U.S. 297, 303 , 96 S.Ct. 2513, 2516-17 , 49 L.Ed.2d 511 (1976); State v. … Younger v. Colorado State Board of Law Examiners, 625 F.2d 372 , 377 n. 3 (10th Cir.1980) (practice of law not a fundamental right).
Cited 25 timesPublishedMissouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2025
Louis County v. State, 482 S.W.3d 842, 846 (Mo. App. W.D. 2016). … Genevieve School District R II v. Board of Aldermen of City of Ste. Genevieve, 66 S.W.3d 6, 10 (Mo. banc 2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.
121 F. 608 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 19, 1903
The only question of consequence presented at the final hearing which was not fully argued at the preliminary hearing is whether the arrangement between the board of trade and the telegraph companies is violative of the provisions … This proposition may be roughly stated as follows: The board of. trade, having a property right in its quotations, contracted with the telegraph companies for their transmission and distribution by the latter; such transmission
Cited 1 timesPublishedMark Twain Bank v. State Banking Board
789 S.W.2d 833 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1990
The last allegation is a repetition of the previous contention that the Board abdicated its duty to the City of Creve Coeur. We must view the record in the light most favorable to the findings of the Board. … Blue Ridge Bank v. State Banking Board, 509 S.W.2d 763 (Mo.App.1974) [10]. Questions of credibility are for the Board. We need not set forth the evidence presented at the hearing.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSt. Louis Mutual Life Ins. v. Board of Assessors
56 Mo. 503 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1874
The record further shows, that the points made by the plaintiff before said board of appeals were overruled, and disallowed. The case was heard in the St. … The Board of Assessors of St. Louis County, 49 Mo., 512 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedHickey v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis
363 Mo. 1039 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1953
Caddo Parish School Board, (La. App.) 183 So. 86 ; Clauss v. Board of Education, 181 Md. App. 513 , 30 A. 2d 779 ; Wood v. Detroit, 188 Mich. 547 , 155 N. W. 592 , L.R.A. 1916C, 388 ; Lewis and Clark County v. … Industrial Accident Board, 52 Mont. 6 , 155 P. 268 , L.R.A. 1916D, 628 ; Nevada Industrial Commission v. Washoe County, 41 Nev. 437 , 171 P. 511 ; Towe v. Yancey County, 224 N. C. 579 , 31 S. E. 2d 754 ; Porter v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedState ex inf. Jones v. West End Light & Power Co.
246 Mo. 653 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 21, 1912
[State ex rel. v. Railway Company, supra; Kavanaugh v. St. Louis, supra; State ex inf. v. Delmar Jockey Club, 200 Mo. 34 ; State ex inf. v. … [The King v. Amery, 2 T. R. 568; Newling v. Francis, 3 T. R. 189; The King v. Miller, 6 T. R. 277.]
Cited 7 timesPublishedState Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters
512 S.W.2d 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1974
V § 22; § 536.-140; Bridges v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 419 S.W.2d 278, 283 [11] (Mo.App.1967); Bittiker v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, supra, 1. c. 404 S.W.2d 404 ; Gaddy v. … Younge v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346, 349 [3] (Mo.1969); Bridges v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedWalker v. St. Louis Board of Education
776 S.W.2d 474 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 12, 1989
Roberts Fertilizer, Inc. v. Steinmeyer, 748 S.W.2d 883, 886 (Mo.App.1988). Also, in order to withstand a motion for summary judgment there must be no genuine issue of fact in dispute. Sands v. … For a more exhaustive explanation of the facts see Westbrook v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, 724 S.W.2d 698 (Mo.App.1987) and Bell v. Board of Education of the City of St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Missouri State Board of Agriculture v. Holladay
64 Mo. 526 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1877
Board Pub. Schools vs. Patton, 62 Mo. 444 .) Immediately upon their adoption they became operative and effective, not only prospectively ¡ but as to all existing appropriations.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSockel v. Missouri State Board of Probation & Parole
297 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 19, 1968
Section 2254, Title 28, U.S.C.; State v. Thompson (Mo.Sup.) 324 S.W.2d 133 ; Baines v. Swenson (C.A. 8, 1967) 384 F.2d 621 ; Collins v. Swenson (C.A. 8, 1967) 384 F.2d 623 ; Hooper v. … Cox v. Nash (W.D.Mo., 1964) 226 F.Supp. 87 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedRose v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
397 S.W.2d 570 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 13, 1965
Hohreiter v. Garrison, 81 Cal.App.2d 384 , 184 P.2d 323, 328 [5]; Board of Medical Examiners v. Steward, 203 Md. 574 , 102 A.2d 248, 252 [7]; Hammers v. … See also Board of Medical Examiners v. Steward, supra; Mayor of City of Everett v. Superior Court, 324 Mass. 144 , 85 N.E.2d 214, 219 [13, 14]; In re Reno, 57 Nev. 314 , 64 P.2d 1036 , 1041 [8]; Winning v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedEdwards v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF NORTHWEST MO. ST. U.
397 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 8, 1975
Browning. 18. … See Wood v. Strickland, supra; McDonald v. Board of Trustees, 375 F.Supp. 95 (N.D.Ill.1974), aff’d. per curiam, 503 F.2d 105 (7th Cir. 1974); but see Scoggins v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLueker v. Missouri Western State University
241 S.W.3d 865 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 2008
Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 147 (Mo.App. W.D.2007). … Brown, 211 S.W.3d at 147 (citation omitted). Failure to follow the requirements preserves nothing for review. Selberg v. Selberg, 201 S.W.3d 513, 515 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). Second, point two of Ms.
Cited 41 timesPublished
Ask Donna