Case law

Lyons v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

86 N.J.L. 206 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1914

Cleveland v. Board of Finance, 38 N. J. L. 259; Rader v. Union, 39 Id. 509; Mutual Benefit Co. v. Elizabeth, 42 Id. 235; Orville v. Woodcliff, 61 Id. 107; Rutgers College v. Morgan, 70 Id. 474; O'Neil v. … Co. v. Newark, 76 Id. 555; Carlstadt National Bank v. Hasbrouck, 83 Id. 383.

Heston v. State Board of Education

89 N.J.L. 486 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 26, 1916

In Hoboken v. Phinney, 29 N. J. L. 65 (on p. 67), Mr. … v.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Conger

67 N.J.L. 444 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1902

If combination indexes are to be made, he is to make them, when the board of chosen freeholders so determines. … Any indexing which, under existing statutes, may be lawfully authorized by the board of chosen freeholders to be done, he is entitled, and he alone authorized, to do.

Del Campo v. Board of Adjustment

6 N.J. Misc. 539 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1928

. *540 The prosecutor appealed to the board of adjustment, which board affirmed the action of the building superintendent.. No testimony was taken. … We see nothing in this case which distinguishes it from the case of Feldman & Pivnick, Incorporated, v. Board of Adjustment of the City of East Orange, and, therefore, the decision in'that case controls here.

Clayton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

3 N.J. Misc. 46 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 31, 1924

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case, directed to the board of freeholders of Monmouth county, to1 show canse why a peremptory or alternative writ,of mandamus should not issue commanding the said board to pay a voucher

Tumulty v. HUDSON COUNTY FREEHOLDER BOARD

29 N.J. 163 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1959

Plaintiff, a taxpayer, instituted suit attack- ing the execution and the manner of rescission of the contract sued upon in Jersey City Stationers Corp. v. County of Hudson, 29 N. J. 159 (1958). … The summary .judgment will therefore be affirmed without prejudice to the plaintiff, who will be given the right to intervene upon application in the remand of the case of Jersey City Stationers Corp. v.

State v. State Board of Assessors

61 N.J.L. 289 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1897

State v. Essex Public Road Board

40 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1878

The improvements on this avenue were projected and executed under the act known as the “ Essex Public Road Board act,” and the questions presented to the court involve *65 the construction of the various acts of legislation … A further objection is urged to the validity of these proceedings, which is of a more radical character; *71 It is insisted that this case is within the rule laid down in State, Gaines, pros., v.

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. State

42 N.J.L. 263 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1880

There is nothing in the case of State v. Freeholders of Essex, 3 Zab. 214, in conflict with this conclusion. … In Freeholders v. Strader, 3 Harr. 108 , the Supreme Court, in holding that no action would lie by an individual for injuries sustained by him for neglect of duty by the board, assumed that an indictment would lie.

Stearns v. Board of Conservation & Development

102 N.J.L. 467 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1926

Frank v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

39 N.J.L. 347 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1877

I think that the case of Swmmerman v.

Emerick v. Teaneck Board of Education

221 N.J. Super. 456 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 9, 1987

Defendant appeals from a decision of Judge Huot in the Chancery Division directing defendant Teaneck Board of Education (Board) to comply with a settlement agreement and pay plaintiff the full agreed amount of $38,350, without … Knuckles v. C.I.R., 349 F.2d 610, 612-613 (10th Cir.1965); Agar v. C.I.R., 290 F.2d 283, 284 (2d Cir.1961); Villaume v. United States, 616 F.Supp. 185, 187-188 (D.Minn.1985).

Nichols v. Board of Education, Jersey City

9 N.J. 241 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 7, 1952

Compare Noonan v. Board of Education of the City of Paterson, 1938 School Law Decisions 331, 336 (Comm’r. of Ed. 1935), affirmed Id. 338 (St. Bd. of Ed. 1925); MacNeal v. … Hoffman v. Hock, 8 N. J. 397, 407, 408 (1952). Por the reasons stated, the decision of the State Board of Education is affirmed.

Board of Educ. v. Education Ass'n

270 N.J. Super. 444 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 19, 1994

Ass'n v. Ridgefield Park Bd. of Educ., 78 N.J. 144, 154 , 393 A. 2d 278 (1978); Harsen v. Board of Educ., 132 N.J. Super. 365, 371 , 333 A. 2d 580 (Law Div. 1975); Communications Workers v. … In the seminal case of Board of Educ. v. Bernards Tp. Educ.

Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling Board

143 N.J. 352 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 29, 1996

Corp. v. … Limiting such claims is essential to prevent federal courts from turning into “zoning board[s] of appeals.” Village of Belle Terre v.

Del Pomo v. Board of Trustees

252 N.J. Super. 430 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1991

Under our standard of review, we will not overturn the decision of the Board unless we find its decision is arbitrary, unreasonable or capricious. See Henry v. … Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 97 N.J. 313, 327 , 478 A.2d 742 (1984); Mayflower Securities Co., Inc. v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N.J. 85, 92-93 , 312 A.2d 497 (1973); Barone v.

ESSEX COUNTY WELFARE BOARD v. Perkins

68 N.J. 161 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 4, 1975

Jenkins v. Newark Board of Education

166 N.J. Super. 300 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 1979

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Clarke

65 N.J.L. 271 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 19, 1900

Warner v. … Randolph v. Wood, 20 Vroom 85 ; S. C., 21 Id. 175 ; Paul v. Gloucester County, Id. 585; Mortland v. Christian, 23 Id. 537; In re Haynes, 25 Id. 6; Matheson v. Caminade, 26 Id. 4; Wood v.

State v. Board of Assessors of Taxes

53 N.J.L. 319 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1891

. *321 Sea Island City v. Cape May, 21 Vroom 50 . … - The board of assessors met'at the court house in-July, 1889, and the resolution was then passed' increasing in some places, and decreasing in others, the amount of the assessment.