Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.37s
State Board of Accountancy v. Integrated Financial Solutions, L.L.C.
256 S.W.3d 48 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 24, 2008
The word “may” confers upon the Board “discretion in the exercise of the power” to grant and refuse permits. See State ex rel. Nixon v. Boone, 927 S.W.2d 892, 897 (Mo.App.1996); State v. … Shockley v. Dir., Div. of Child Support Enforcement, 980 S.W.2d 173, 175 (Mo.App.1998). The representation in question is a statement in the Board’s brief in Kossmeyer’s revocation case, Kossmeyer v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBRADLEY LEE BROWN JR., Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.
450 S.W.3d 847 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2014
State v. Brown, 353 S.W.3d 412, 414 (Mo. App. S.D. 2011). Movant timely sought post-conviction relief. An amended motion was filed on Movant's behalf. … See, e.g., Gray v. State, 139 S.W.3d 617, 623 (Mo. App. W.D. 2004); State v. Brown, 867 S.W.2d 530, 536 (Mo. App. W.D. 1993).
Cited 5 timesPublishedHamm v. Poplar Bluff R-1 School District
955 S.W.2d 27 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 1997
C.F.S. v. Mahan, supra. The district, through its board of directors, could have concluded that Mr. … See Ross v. Robb, 662 S.W.2d 257, 259 (Mo. banc 1983). The school board could have concluded that Mr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Trade Office Building v. Shannon Grain Co.
223 Mo. App. 1199 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1929
The judgment was rendered in a consolidated cause made up of three separate unlawful detainer actions, all of which involved rooms in the old Board of Trade Building in Kansas City. … J., p. 603; Carnhart v. Finney, 40 Mo. 449 ; Grouch v. Wabash, St. L. & Pac. Ry. Co., 22 Mo. App. 315 ; Trauerman v. Lippincott, 39 Mo. App. 478 ; Mansur v. Chamberlin, 162 Mo. App. 155 ; Bobb v. Frank L.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 31, 2017
She told the Board that the Miller decision was wrong and should not be followed. Mr. Brown’s attorney was not permitted to respond to anything the victim said. … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownReeder v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MARSHALL SCHOOL DISTRICT
323 S.W.3d 830 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 2010
Order PER CURIAM: Nathan Reeder appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Saline County, which upheld the ruling of the Board of Education of Marshall School District terminating his employment. … In five points on appeal, Reeder argues reversible error because he claims his due process rights were violated by an unfair and partial hearing and the Board’s decision to terminate him was not supported by competent and
Cited 0 timesPublishedExecutive Board of Missouri Baptist General Ass'n v. Campbell
275 S.W.2d 388 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1955
Gaddy v. Slcelly Oil Company, Mo., 259 S.W.2d 844, 848 . … Gaddy v. Skelly Oil Company, supra. Furthermore, there is some evidence tending to prove that the explosion may have resulted from a cause for which defendant is not liable. Waldron v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWescott v. Burtonwood Manor Condominium Association Board of Managers
743 S.W.2d 555 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1987
Nappier v. Kincade, 666 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo.App.1984). … McCready v. Southard, 671 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Mo.App.1984).
Cited 7 timesPublishedState ex rel. Strohm v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
869 S.W.2d 302 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1994
Transit Casualty Company v. … In Farmland Dairies and Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters
512 S.W.2d 150 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1974
V § 22; § 536.-140; Bridges v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 419 S.W.2d 278, 283 [11] (Mo.App.1967); Bittiker v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, supra, 1. c. 404 S.W.2d 404 ; Gaddy v. … Younge v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346, 349 [3] (Mo.1969); Bridges v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedAziz ex rel. Brown v. Jack in the Box, Eastern Division, LP
477 S.W.3d 98 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 2015
Adams v. Badgett, 114 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Mo.App.E.D.2003). … See Hogate v. American Golf Corp., 97 S.W.3d 44 (Mo.App.E.D.2002); Cochran v. Burger King Corp., 937 S.W.2d 358 (Mo.App.W.D.1996).
Cited 2 timesPublishedRouse v. Chase Manhattan Bank, U.S.A., N.A. (In re Brown)
226 B.R. 39 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Sep 15, 1998
In Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. … Landmark Bank v. Ciaravino, 752 S.W.2d at 928 . . 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a); Viking Assoc., L.L.C. v. Drewes (In re Olson), 120 F.3d 98, 102 (8th Cir. 1997). . Olson, 120 F.3d at 102 ; Bird v. Carl's Grocery Co.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMissouri Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. State Board of Registration
343 S.W.3d 348 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 28, 2011
V, sec. 10. On September 4, 2009, the Board filed a complaint against Dr. Kunkel. … Co. of Missouri v.
Cited 15 timesPublished91 Mo. 196 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1886
On January 17, 1880, a majority of the board of directors of said bank met in regular session, and upon motion duly seconded, resolved that they believed it to be to the interest of all concerned that Joseph Brown be appointed … In Chew v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDorris v. Missouri Substance Abuse Counselors' Certification Board, Inc.
10 S.W.3d 557 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1999
Lederer v. Director of Division of Aging, 865 S.W.2d 682, 684 (Mo.App. W.D.1993). … Williams v. City of Kansas City, 841 S.W.2d 193, 198 (Mo.App. W.D.1992).
Cited 5 timesPublishedErwin v. St. Joseph Board of Public Schools
12 F. 680 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Nov 15, 1880
Joseph should be exercised by the board. … I fully concur in the reasoning on this subject in the case of Gauss v. Clarksville, 19 Alb. Law J. 253 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedWestern Newspaper Union v. Woodward
133 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 1955
on the basis of the representations made by both Brown and Walters, affiant recommended, and so did Brown, to plaintiff's Board of Directors, at their meeting of March 29, 1951, acceptance of Woodward’s offer of $125 per … Brown, 17 How. 182 , 58 U.S. 23 , 15 L.Ed. 208 ; Smyth Sales v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co., 3 Cir., 128 F.2d 697 ; James-Dickenson Farm Mortgage Co. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedOdegard Outdoor Advertising, LLC v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
6 S.W.3d 148 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 23, 1999
On July 18,1996, the Jackson County board of zoning adjustment (“BZA”) issued decisions denying the requested variances and sustaining the Director’s initial denial of the special use permits. … In University City v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBarding v. Board of Curators of Lincoln University
497 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 26, 1980
In Coleman v. … Barnes v. Costle, 561 F.2d 983, 990-92 (D.C.Cir.1977); Gillin v. Federal Paperboard Co., 479 F.2d 97 (2d Cir. 1973); Sprogis v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBoard of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.
121 F. 608 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 19, 1903
The only question of consequence presented at the final hearing which was not fully argued at the preliminary hearing is whether the arrangement between the board of trade and the telegraph companies is violative of the provisions … This proposition may be roughly stated as follows: The board of. trade, having a property right in its quotations, contracted with the telegraph companies for their transmission and distribution by the latter; such transmission
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna