Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.60s
311 So. 2d 838 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 18, 1975
Cited 0 timesPublished295 So. 2d 703 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 13, 1974
Cited 0 timesPublished279 So. 2d 410 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jun 18, 1973
Cited 0 timesPublished271 So. 2d 789 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 10, 1973
Cited 0 timesPublished270 So. 2d 67 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 29, 1972
Cited 0 timesPublished253 So. 2d 721 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 28, 1971
Cited 0 timesPublished216 So. 2d 236 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 10, 1968
Cited 0 timesPublished97 So. 2d 484 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 16, 1957
Cited 0 timesPublished111 So. 2d 501 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 24, 1959
Cited 0 timesPublished66 So. 2d 232 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jul 17, 1953
preponderates in favor of the defendant in support of his plea that he sold the dog only on an expressed warranty that the dog could run for three hours, and instead of being induced to buy the dog you find that Faircloth induced Brown … and if you find by the testimony that a three-hour dog meant only that the dog was capable and could run three hours without- weakening; and that there was no misrepresentation, your verdict would be for the defendant, Brown
Cited 0 timesPublished107 Fla. 281 · Supreme Court of Florida · Nov 21, 1932
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna