Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.74s
Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. City of Birmingham
253 Ala. 402 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1950
Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, J. D. Adams, V. G. … BROWN, FOSTER, LIVINGSTON and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cited 28 timesPublished473 So. 2d 1090 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 19, 1985
Evans v. Evans , 441 So.2d 948 (Ala.Civ.App. 1983). … Self v. Maynor , 421 So.2d 1279 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982).
Cited 9 timesPublishedJaffe Corp., Inc. v. Board of Adjustment, Etc
361 So. 2d 556 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Mar 9, 1977
Board of County Commissioners of County of Boulder v. Thompson , 177 Colo. 277 , 493 P.2d 1358 (1972). But see City of Kewanee v. Riverside Industrial Materials Co. , 21 Ill. … (City of Chicago v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNixon v. Autauga County Board of Education
273 F. Supp. 2d 1292 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 29, 2003
Nixon also identified Charles Brown (hereinafter “Brown”) as being a driver who was paid an additional $15/day for transporting students to the Alternative School. … Accord, Miranda v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNationwide Retirement Solutions, Inc. v. Alabama State Personnel Board
54 So. 3d 886 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 2010
Brown also filed a motion objecting to the appointment. On January 26, 2010, the Board filed this petition for a writ of mandamus. … Burgess v.
Cited 13 timesPublished390 So. 2d 15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 22, 1980
In addition, Spinnelli v. … In Parke v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedNorth Alabama Lumber Co. v. Board of Education
210 Ala. 254 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 18, 1923
Works v. Moragne, 119 Ala. 80, 83 , 24 South. 834 ; Briel v. Exchange Nat. Bank, 172 Ala. 475 , 55 South. 808 ; Little v. People’s Bank of Mobile, 209 Ala. 620 , 96 South. 763 ; Falk v. Moebs, 127 U. S. 597 , 8 Sup. … In Clark v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGadsden City Board of Education v. B.P.
3 F. Supp. 2d 1299 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · May 4, 1998
Dist. v. Raelee S., by and Through Heidi S., 96 F.3d 78 , 80 n. 1 (3rd Cir.1996), the “status quo provision,” J.B. v. Killingly Bd. of Educ., 990 F.Supp. 57, 68 (D.Conn.1997), or the. “stay-put provision” of the IDEA. … THE MOOTNESS ISSUE Pursuant to Honig v. Doe, the Board sought an injunction in the present case claiming that B.P. and L.H. were “substantially likely” to injure themselves or others. See id. at 328 , 108 S.Ct. at 606 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedWaldrop v. Alabama State Board of Public Accountancy
473 So. 2d 1064 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 10, 1985
Hallman v. City of Northport, 333 So.2d 152 (Ala.Civ.App. 1976); Smith v. Civil Service Board, 52 Ala.App. 44 , 289 So.2d 614 (1974). … Alabama Board of Nursing v. Herrick, 454 So.2d 1041 (Ala.Civ.App.1984).
Cited 3 timesPublishedAlabama Department of Youth Services v. State Personnel Board
7 So. 3d 380 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Oct 24, 2008
See Alabama Dep’t of Human Res. v. Dye, 921 So.2d [421, 426 (Ala.Civ.App.2005) ] (quoting Prometheus Radio Project v. FCC, 373 F.3d [372, 389 (3d Cir.2004) ] (quoting in turn Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. … Sexton v. Tuscaloosa County Civil Serv.
Cited 17 timesPublishedState Board of Adjustment v. State Ex Rel. Sossaman
231 Ala. 520 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 13, 1936
Co., 7 Wall. 386 , 19 L.Ed. 257 ; Jackson Hill Coal & Coke Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Sullivan County, 181 Ind. 335 , 104 N.E. 497 ; Wilcox v. Fitch, 20 Johns (N.Y.) 472; Rouss v. Ditmore, 122 N.C. 775 , 30 S.E. 335 . … Green v. Disbrow, 79 N.Y. 1 , 35 Am.Rep. 496 ; Nonce v. Richmond, etc., R. Co. (C.C.) 33 F. 429 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Randolph County v. State
256 Ala. 107 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 17, 1951
BROWN, Justice. … Doullut & Williams v. Hoffman, 204 Ala. 33 , 86 So. 73 ; Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Brownrigg, 231 Ala. 162 , 163 So. 786 ; Pearson v. Van Antwerp Realty Corporation, 231 Ala. 315 , 164 So. 729 ; Hunt v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSmith v. Civil Service Board of City of Florence
52 Ala. App. 44 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jan 30, 1974
McKinzie v. Standard Accident Ins. Co., 198 S.C. 109 , 16 S.E.2d 529 . See also City of Jackson v. LaChance, 372 S.W.2d 479 (Mo.App.); New Orleans & G. N. R. Co. v. … We feel the exception of Cain v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMonroe County Board of Education v. Barbarietta Turner-Pugh
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 5, 2026
Stribling Equip., Inc. v. … Alabama State Tenure Comm'n v. Board of Sch. Comm'rs of Mobile Cnty., 332 So. 2d 724, 730 (Ala. Civ. App. 1976). That is exactly what occurred here.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArant v. Board of Adjustment of City of Montgomery
271 Ala. 600 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 3, 1960
Lumund v. Board of Adjustment, 4 N.J. 577 , 73 A.2d 545 ; O’Neill v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 384 Pa. 379 , 120 A.2d 901 . … ” Board of Zoning Appeals v.
Cited 20 timesPublished707 So. 2d 251 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Nov 7, 1997
See Crane v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. , 682 So.2d 1389 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996); Shirt Depot v. Ritter , 660 So.2d 1017 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995). … Brown v. State , 694 So.2d 1342 , 1343 (Ala. 1997). A petition for a writ of mandamus will not be granted absent a clear showing that the trial court has abused its discretion.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBell v. Eufaula City Board of Education
995 F. Supp. 1377 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 23, 1998
Bell contested the transfer before the Board of Education, which upheld the decision. … Bell now files the instant action, claiming that the Eufaula Board of Education (“The Board”) discriminated against him on the basis of race, age, and gender, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 16, 2019
O’Brian, Case No. 4:10- cv-00475-JHH-RRA; Broadhead v. Hopkins, Case No. 4:10-cv-00439-LSC-RRA; and Broadhead v. … Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1192 (11th Cir. 1999); Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 728-30 (11th Cir. 1998); Hernandez v. Ryan, No. 10-22789, 2010 WL 3447486 (S.D. Fla.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLee v. Ozark City Board of Education
517 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 10, 1981
The threshold question in a suit of this nature is whether plaintiff-intervenor has established a prima facie case under the standards of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. … Baldwin v. Birmingham Board of Education, 648 F.2d 950 (5th Cir. 1981), amended June 11, 1981). Plaintiff in this suit has been given such an opportunity.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna